BREAKING - Jury Reaches Penalty Verdict in Boston Marathon Bombing Trial - Livestream

originally posted by: Kapusta
According to you and the MSM hogwash you have been eating .

Nope. According to HIM. He and his lawyer admitted he did it.
They stood up in the courtroom and freely said he did it.
He's no 'patsy'. He's a cold blooded,unrepentant, mass murderer.

originally posted by: Kapusta
He Will join the other Patsy's in History.

God Speed Dzhokhar Tsarnaev

He was old enough to know right from wrong, regardless of what his brother said or did. His actions killed and maimed men woman and children, and you wanna call him a patsy and wish him gods speed? You're disgusting.

Does he deserve to die, probably. But isn't killing him giving him what he wants. When your planning a terrorist attack and are young. You probably think your invincible and will get away with it. When your caught and reality sets in. You probably start to think. At least I will be a martyr. I will die and people will use my death against my enemy. My death will be a rallying cry to my brothers.

These are not ordinary people. They want to die. So wouldn't giving him life be better. Let him sit in a cell forever. A sign to the other terrorists. Even if you pull off your attack you lose. You are nothing. You will grow old and alone. We will not think about you. We will not give you what you want. Your evil act had no purpose.

a reply to: Dwoodward85

I'm USUALLY against the death penalty .. except in cases where it is necessary in order to save more lives. Most people can be locked up for life and the death penalty isn't necessary. Some are too dangerous to have locked up. Because international Islamic extremism is involved in this one, he had to be given death. If left alive it would give terrorists fodder for more attacks. He could be used as an excuse for hostage taking and terrorist threats. He has to die.

a reply to: EternalSolace

Your comment made me think of something. Tim McVeigh was only on federal death row about six years.

I Believe they streamline the federal death sentence with this act?

anti terrorism and death penalty act 1996.

Death is too good for terrorists

40 years of hard labour in Alaska until he is too old or too sick to work any more then one day somebody drags him outside and puts a bullet in his head and sticks him in a pit somewhere.

originally posted by: Greathouse
I don't believe in the death penalty. Anyway 60 years of solitary confinement at Supermax would've been far worse.

Sure, 3 squares and some reading material, maybe a tv for 60 years all paid for by us. No thank you. You want solitary confinement? then you take him and deal with him.

I'm split on this decision.
Personally I think he should rot in a jail cell,
but on the flip side, he is not worth the tax payer money.

He will get what he wanted, martyrdom.

However, I think he will be in for a shock when he does get to the other side.

Anyways, glad it is over, and everyone can now move on knowing justice has been done,
or will be once he is executed.

a reply to: Greathouse

Good call. That completely escaped me. Hopefully, there won't be years upon years of useless appeals. I really don't like my tax money being used to feed a terrorist for 20+ years.

I get that people don't want to pay for him to be in jail, but this is the type of man that needs to be in there.
We need to depopulate our prison population so we can keep men like this behind bars.

Death is to easy, death is what he wants.
That is why he was emotionless imo, he is getting what he wants.

There's no appeal that I can see getting you off of all 6 death sentences.

a reply to: FlyersFan

See the problem with your opinion is I'd argue against it but I'm fighting to stop myself from agreeing with you but sadly sometimes the problem is, that with his execution it might be used to bring in more terrorists.

originally posted by: FlyersFan

originally posted by: Kapusta
According to you and the MSM hogwash you have been eating .

Nope. According to HIM. He and his lawyer admitted he did it.
They stood up in the courtroom and freely said he did it.
He's no 'patsy'. He's a cold blooded,unrepentant, mass murderer.

Is that why he maintained a not guilty plea ?

His lawyer was never on his side from the jump.

show me evidence from his mouth that he said "I am guilty "


truthandshadows.wordpress.com...

a reply to: howmuch4anotherI would suggest that just because the death penalty has been brought down on this teenager. It will be at least 20 years before it actually happens. I am sure there are automatic appeals to this case. It will be drug out for at least 10 years if not 20. It will not happen at noon tomorrow.

originally posted by: FlyersFan
I"m against the death penalty in most cases.
In this case, he deserves death.

I'm against the death penalty, period.

a reply to: IntroduceALittleIrony

No so fast, I seen on a TV report the new jails that were built to house the worst in the nation including terrorist, they are underground, solitary confinement means the person is all by itself in the jail with not even guards to be seen, when they take a shower a robot comes down the long hallway and the cell opens for the inmate to walk into the unit.

The only ready material depending of their religious believes is either a bible or the Koran as an example.

Is pretty amazing what is been used this days for the worst of the worst in the nation.

a reply to: Kapusta

He did it. They fully admit he did it. They kept the 'not guilty' because they wanted to blame the older brother saying it was the brothers fault and he pushed the younger into doing it. No sane person buys that.

Tsarnaev Defense Admits Guilt

"They have all kinds of evidence. They have video of Dzhokhar dropping his backpack behind the eight-year-old that was killed," Hunter said. "He makes a phone call to his brother and then all the heads snap left, you assume upon seeing the first explosion down the street."

The defence said they won't sidestep his guilt, calling the attack senseless, although Tsarnaev has entered a plea of not guilty. The prevailing theory among legal analysts is that this trial will be about whether Tsarnaev lives or dies, as 17 of the 30 charges laid against him carry the possibility of the death penalty.

"We take no issue with the facts from the ground that week," Hunter quotes Judy Clarke, one of America's foremost
death-penalty defence attorneys. "It WAS him. So why are we here? Where we differ is, Why? How did we get from this to this?" Clark asked, holding up a photograph of Tsarnaev as a happy teenager, followed by one of him and his brother Tamerlan at the time of the attack.

show me evidence from his mouth that he said "I am guilty "

His lawyer admitted he was guilty. He agreed with his lawyer. He could have dumped him at any time or stood up and said 'I didn't do it the lawyer is wrong'. At ANY TIME he could have. He did not.

HE DID IT.

a reply to: EternalSolace

In the end it usually cost more to execute but it is what it is, I don't like the death penalty..better he live with it in a supermax.

a reply to: marg6043

That sounds fine to me, isolation is hell in its self.

a reply to: IntroduceALittleIrony


As soon as he's dead he will become a martyr.



Here's the first article I searched on Supermax.

The worst of the worst in America's vast prison network are delivered to ADX, the "Alcatraz of the Rockies," in buses, special vehicles, even Black Hawk helicopters.

Heavily armed patrols cruise the sprawling complex. A dozen imposing gun towers rise above squat brick buildings. Walls topped with razor wire partially block the snow-capped mountains.

"As soon as they come through the door ... you see it in their faces," former ADX warden Robert Hood said. "That's when it really hits you. You're looking at the beauty of the Rocky Mountains in the backdrop. When you get inside, that is the last time you will ever see it."

"The Supermax is life after death," said Hood, who served as ADX warden from 2002 to 2005. "It's long term. ... In my opinion, it's far much worse than death."

'The architecture is the control'

Many of the more than 400 inmates spend as much as 23 hours a day alone in 7-by-12-foot concrete cells. Meals are slid through small holes in the doors. Bed is a concrete slab dressed with a thin mattress and blankets.

A single window about 42 inches high and 4 inches wide allows some natural light but is made so prisoners cannot see beyond the building. Cells have unmovable stools and desks made of concrete. Solid walls prevent prisoners from seeing other cells or having direct contact with other inmates.

"The architecture of the building is the control," Hood said.

"You're designing it so the inmates can't see the sky. Intentionally. You're putting up wires so helicopters can't land."

Inmates have little contact outside of guards and prison staff. They must wear leg irons, handcuffs and stomach chains when taken outside their cells -- and be escorted by guards. A recreation hour is allowed in an outdoor cage slightly larger than the prison cells. Inside the cage, only the sky is visible.

"You're passing hundreds, hundreds of cameras as metal doors are sliding open and closed," Hood said.

source


I can see why people wouldn't want to pay. But if Tsarnaev wasn't there somebody else would be.