It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Lucklad56
a reply to: StoutBroux
I wish I had more answers.. Basically.. If I want to get my scripts refilled.. Scripts I've been on for ten plus years.. I have to pay $200. They no longer accept insurance for my medicine. They can if they wanted to.. Because prior to this I paid my co pay of $25 and another $25 when my insurance refused to pay for my urine.. After the DEA audit.. Everything changed.. I honestly see this change as a way to make it worth the hassle the docs go through with all this DEA bs.. Could be wrong though..
originally posted by: Lucklad56
a reply to: new_here
How is your situation coming along? Sorry didn't mean to derail your thread!
originally posted by: darkbake
a reply to: new_here
This is a ridiculous situation! Since when are you required to take a urine test to show that you are on the drugs prescribed? I have never heard of such a thing. I agree, you should contact a lawyer. And the urine test costs are more than outrageous!
originally posted by: MystikMushroom
Oh...I see. They drug test you to see if you're taking the drug and not just selling the prescriptions, right?
I was wondering why they'd be drug testing you. This seems like a messed up way to keep prescription drugs off the streets.
originally posted by: windword
a reply to: new_here
Is this drug something that you can just stop taking without side effects? I can't understand why they would revoke a necessary prescription just like that, with no recourse. It seems really irresponsible!
I'd find a lawyer, if I were you!
originally posted by: MonsterMash
Hi there. I live in the middle GA area and have heard about this through a friend that got cut off for same reason and my personal Dr warned me they would be doing UDTs on patients that use controlled substances. This included me since I'm prescribed Xanax. I've had no problems but my friend experienced the same situation you did down to the letter.
Bottom line is the DEA is cracking down hard on Drs that loosely prescribe meds to ppl that either abuse or sell them.
After the urinalysis, they will determine if you're on the correct level in your system. If not, you're gone. No questions or answers. In their eyes, you have no excuse. Blood pressure or any other circumstances be damned. If they tell you to take it, they're the Dr. Take them.
Also, get ready to be harassed constantly now that you're on their "list". You may be called in to the office at any time for another urinalysis or they may ask for your bottle to count them. One short? You're gone.
This new way of dealing with prescription medications started at the first of the year here.
Good Luck!!!
originally posted by: MonsterMash
Hi there. I live in the middle GA area and have heard about this through a friend that got cut off for same reason and my personal Dr warned me they would be doing UDTs on patients that use controlled substances. This included me since I'm prescribed Xanax. I've had no problems but my friend experienced the same situation you did down to the letter.
Bottom line is the DEA is cracking down hard on Drs that loosely prescribe meds to ppl that either abuse or sell them.
After the urinalysis, they will determine if you're on the correct level in your system. If not, you're gone. No questions or answers. In their eyes, you have no excuse. Blood pressure or any other circumstances be damned. If they tell you to take it, they're the Dr. Take them.
Also, get ready to be harassed constantly now that you're on their "list". You may be called in to the office at any time for another urinalysis or they may ask for your bottle to count them. One short? You're gone.
This new way of dealing with prescription medications started at the first of the year here.
Good Luck!!!
originally posted by: whyamIhere
Why should patients that have done nothing wrong be subjected to this.
The State has turned our Doctors into Policemen of body fluids.
I have committed no crime. I feel like I am on probation.
I think being forced to give samples is against my basic human rights.
How chilling this must be to the Medical Industry.
Today it's my rights. But soon they will be coming after yours.
originally posted by: new_here
originally posted by: SunnyDee
a reply to: new_here
When my husband changed healthcare, he walked in to his old doc's office and waited while they copied his records, and then personally hand delivered them to the new doc.
Didn't real this whole thread, so don't know if this was suggested.
When I went to pick up a copy of the test results, I told them I wanted my records. The records lady said she would charge me 65 cents per page, but it would be free to transfer them to another doctor. She said she would call and let me know how much it would be total (after 15 years, who knows how many pages!) but she never did.
I'm beginning to think, it is in my best interest, health-wise and for my sanity, to be gone from that place. This all may be Divine intervention, trial by fire, come out the other side better than I was before!
originally posted by: whyamIhere
originally posted by: Mugly
Same here... until 3 weeks ago. Then *BOOM* - 'you're fired! We don't trust you!'
im not worried about the levels of my scripted meds.
if i test i will fail for an illicit substance
I just took a UT at my Docs. I get tested at least 4X a year.
I use Medical MJ on a daily basis. My Doc knows this. They don't test for THC.
I threw such a hissie about my legal MMJ they stopped testing for it.
But, this is California, they are not hung up on it.
A normal Doc is not going to boot you for one bad test...But, they can.
I hate to have my private body fluid illegally stolen and used against me.
They did it because the amount of drugs getting abused is staggering.
Obamacare...Is a crime against us all...
originally posted by: Lucklad56
originally posted by: new_here
a reply to: Lucklad56
It just occured to me to ask... Can you not submit the claim to your insurance yourself to recoup what they would ordinarily pay towards your visit?
I say that, because years ago, some doctors' offices did not automatically file your insurance claim for you. You had to keep up with the receipts & paperwork and send it in on your own.
Just a thought.
When I asked why the sudden change.. She told me the DEA told the Doc he no longer had to take insurance if he didn't want to.. Mongths later I still haven't gotten a clear answer..but my yearly doc expenses went from $600 to $2,400.. Not including medicine costs.. Yeah I would love to hear Navydocs view..
originally posted by: StoutBroux
originally posted by: Lucklad56
originally posted by: new_here
a reply to: Lucklad56
It just occured to me to ask... Can you not submit the claim to your insurance yourself to recoup what they would ordinarily pay towards your visit?
I say that, because years ago, some doctors' offices did not automatically file your insurance claim for you. You had to keep up with the receipts & paperwork and send it in on your own.
Just a thought.
When I asked why the sudden change.. She told me the DEA told the Doc he no longer had to take insurance if he didn't want to.. Mongths later I still haven't gotten a clear answer..but my yearly doc expenses went from $600 to $2,400.. Not including medicine costs.. Yeah I would love to hear Navydocs view..
After reading all 12 pages, I am still confused. Is the DEA telling only docs that prescribe narcotic meds they no longer need to take insurance or are they telling ALL docs they don't have to accept insurance? Or they can decline insurance on any patient receiving the questionable meds? This seems almost Benedict Arnoldish. I definitely would be turning in my receipts to the insurance company for reimbursement. The DEA has absolutely no business in the medical insurance industry.
All tests and their fees not covered by insurance should be disclosed by the requestor of the tests and the amounts to the patient prior to issuing the request and also authorized by the patient confirming they will pay.
I'd say you are the one who lucked out, ultimately.
originally posted by: damwel
a reply to: whyamIhere
Obama? I hate to tell you this but the president who made that rule to help insurance companies was Ronald Reagan.
originally posted by: tigertatzen
a reply to: new_here
I'd say you are the one who lucked out, ultimately.
I agree with NavyDoc. And, like I said before...you could be an unwitting instrument of change for the better. You're raising awareness, opening eyes. And you're not going to be caught in the crossfire if the DEA decides to unleash on that doctor, because you're taking your business elsewhere.