Roswell Slide - First Look without paying $15

a reply to: raedar

Looks a little like that mini-micro alien of Stephen Greer but than bigger....which disappeared in the alien-UFO history oblivion.

The strange thing about this one is the 5 ribs on one side.. which is non-human.

I figure that even if something real were to pop up showing ET or any truth, it would either be instantly regarded as a hoax, discredited or taken down.

But even getting taken down would raise questions, so they may not even remove it if the masses believe that it's false. It won't fool the minority that keeps an eye on such though.

In regards to the body, it is interesting. If it is an alien, it could be a hybrid corpse, or one of the Neonate or Grey species. I feel it is probably the body of a child who faced some genetic defect (could also be the case if failed hybrid), but anything is possible.

a reply to: zatara

Exactly what I thought!

I guess my original Op sounded kind of negative, and I do apologize b/c I don't want to be responsible for swaying anyone one way or the other- because I don't know what's true.

But just like Zatara said, it looks like the Greer "alien". My personal feelings about Greer made me instantly dismayed upon seeing the first slide.

I want to see the others! I'm very much interested and still open-minded. But also exhausted by all the hoaxers feeding off the curiosity of the public.

This is such an important subject and I find it impossible to trust!

a reply to: introvert

I hear what you're saying, but the $15 I spoke of was what I interpreted by looking at the website before the event. It looked to me (I do not speak or read Spanish) that they were charging $15 to view the live stream. I'm pretty sure the auditorium seats were more expensive. I have a feeling they raked in a lot of cash. And why not? I'm as enterprising as the next fellow, but when it comes to a potential scientific discovery, I think it was a very bad decision. I would think peer reviews would be a great start. This information should be free!

originally posted by: Staroth
Pretty sure it's another "atta boy" like this one from Ripley's Believe it or Not.

Compared to the woman standing behind it, the supposed alien is a bit bigger than Ripley's mini-mummy.

Just do a Google image search for "Child Mummy Smithsonian," and compare what you find with the alleged alien. Which is something the intrepid researchers apparently never managed to do.

originally posted by: Blue Shift

originally posted by: Staroth
Pretty sure it's another "atta boy" like this one from Ripley's Believe it or Not.

Compared to the woman standing behind it, the supposed alien is a bit bigger than Ripley's mini-mummy.

Just do a Google image search for "Child Mummy Smithsonian," and compare what you find with the alleged alien. Which is something the intrepid researchers apparently never managed to do.

But that rectangular label is unlike any rectangular label I've ever seen... that's the smoking gun right there.

a reply to: raedar

I don't buy it. Literally.

Perhaps they are charging pay per view because the Major networks where suckered in by the "autopsy videos" 20 odd years ago and won't be suckered in again. Fool me once...

The fact that these people will charge money for intangible evidence is a sign of the times and that is why my faith in mainstream ufology is starting to wane.

a reply to: raedar

Sorry folks...but that 'ET' looks WAY too much like an almost full term aborted fetus.

Just saying what a lot of us are probably thinking.

Unless of course it's a fetus from an ET, there doesn't seem to be much going on that is out of this world.

Mirror UK link

Wow, lol-




Edit - And it was $20, not $15. From the link:

Although there was a live stream available, viewers had to fork out $20 if they wanted to watch it.

The body in that picture has no features at all that could be described as alien. Looks more like a mumy child they stole from some mayan tomb. So where are the other pics?

originally posted by: Unity_99
Not sure what think on this. Worried that its not fake, and they may be cloning, genetically engineering fetus's as faux ETs. And then drugging and dismembering them to death as a ritual sacrifice which would be horrific but many of the powers that want be are evil.

It's hard as an experiencer to know what precisely is under the biosuit they wear, all I can say is what that looks like to me.

I had thought the same, that they have been working since the first to create a humanoid that can face the challenges of space travel. Breeding the perfected human for space would I think be a priority.

The true ugliness of such a process, the deformed the horrid deaths and painful experiments to the engineered children would be horrific, but they worked with Nazis who were used to such things.

The Roswell thing could have been our own engineered creations sent into space as a test as they once used monkeys crashing on return they did end up near a base.

a reply to: raedar

So, intelligent extraterrestrial life forms are humanoids that look exactly like mummified babies complete with spinal cords, rib cages, skulls and articulated hands/fingers. They evolved along a completely separate path on another planet and their DNA still produced hominids with the exact characteristics as humans. I would like to sell you the Brooklyn Bridge next.

I predict that this too will turn out to be fake. People keep falling for this type of "evidence" and that's why the fakers keep faking it.

a reply to: DrogoTheNorman

Of course it'll be revealed as a fake. Jaime Maussan's middle name might as well be "hoaxer." This is just the latest in a long string of fakes that he's showcased. And as I already said in the other thread, it looks like a cheap, plastic Hollywood prop to me.

a reply to: hesse

I only have seen the one that has been released for free.

Such an ordinary, run of the mill, seen it before, boring and totally non-scientific presentation, for MONEY, none the less.... for what was supposed to be a revelation.

At least, the VERY least, you would have a DNA sample in the presentation signed by a recognized Scientist/Science Lab.

Reason why not?

It is Human, or they would have backed up their story with something tangible.

There are so many of these poor little fetus's or days old children on this planet, in jars, mummified, buried...
I cannot believe that this is the way they chose to reveal something so revolutionary... but then again... I guess I do.
Just does more damage to a subject that is reeling from all of the other mis-representation and outright forgery.

originally posted by: draknoir2
But that rectangular label is unlike any rectangular label I've ever seen... that's the smoking gun right there.

I've used Photoshop to get a better look at it, and it reads:
ROSWELL ALIEN -- DO NOT TOUCH -- NO FLASH PHOTOGRAPHY

originally posted by: Blue Shift

originally posted by: draknoir2
But that rectangular label is unlike any rectangular label I've ever seen... that's the smoking gun right there.

I've used Photoshop to get a better look at it, and it reads:
ROSWELL ALIEN -- DO NOT TOUCH -- NO FLASH PHOTOGRAPHY

I believe you without question.

a reply to: Kojiro

Yes: remember the "creature" caught in the steel trap that turned out to just be a mummified monkey?

This will turn out to be another letdown.

originally posted by: Xeven

originally posted by: gortex
a reply to: raedar

Thanks for the update , here's a closer look.

Poor little dude lost a leg

Not aliens. They are "future" man made biological entities designed to survive the travel from the future through space-time. Natural Humans cannot make the trip

Not time travelers
They are from a subatomic race of beings. a vast race that exists on such a tiny scale that they are literally inperceptable by anything we have currently.
They build bodies to exist with the large scale in the same way a super advanced race of our sized beings would rearrange galaxys to interact with extremely large beings we can't yet perceive.

I know this is 100% fact because I made it up, and it is equally plausible as futureman coming back here to screw up the timeline...more plausible in fact.