It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: KawRider9
a reply to: mOjOm
"a fair living wage", is where I get pissy with you types. Why do people think they're entitled to a "living wage" for doing a job that doesn't envolve any skills?
originally posted by: OptimusSubprime
a reply to: mOjOm
The only logical and responsible answer to your question is to let the market dictate wages. If my competition is paying X, then I would want to pay X+1. There would be competition to offer the best pay, and attract employees. In today's world of government controlled wages, there is no difference between McDonald's and Burger King from an employment perspective, because they are both minimum wage jobs (or slightly higher). Both companies can pay what they pay and use the minimum wage law as a scapegoat. Get rid of the law, and then both companies would have to attract employees, and based on what they offer they would find quality employees.
originally posted by: Guidance.Is.Internal
All the minimum wage does is make the poor, the uneducated, the felons, etc. unemployable, because I can always find someone who isn't an ex-con, has a high school education, etc. for minimum wage. The minimum wage is one of the most racist, anti-freedom cons ever perpetrated on the public. And the crazy thing is, most people don't understand business, economics, or basic logic for that matter - so they believe that minimum wage is a good thing. It actually resulted in huge levels of black unemployment because all the white southern factory owners had to pay everyone a "white man's" salary, so guess what? No more blacks were hired. Unintended consequences are a bitch.
originally posted by: KawRider9
a reply to: Aazadan
Again, if you want to spend your "lifetime" sweeping floors, washing vehicles and running errands, I'm more than happy to pay ya 10dph.
You want a better wage than that? Apply yourself and move up the ranks!
Or be like my 40yo dishwasher buddy, living in his parents basement, demanding a better wage because he's "owed"
a reply to: mOjOm
What most people don't realize, or perhaps take into consideration, is that the owner works many more hours in many cases than the employees..
originally posted by: mOjOm
This is a simple question that, hopefully, will receive some honest answers from those of you who employ people making the current minimum wage. If the government were to repeal all of the minimum wage laws in the U.S. what would you consider to be fair living wage for new hires with little or no experience? Would you keep hiring people at the same wage as you do now, or would you decrease/increase wages? Considering the fact that minimum wage jobs are called that because employers pay the lowest possible wages allowed by law, how would the removal of those laws affect your decisions regarding what fair pay is?
I am addressing this to business owners, not those who think they know what business owners would do in this situation, but the actual owners themselves. Please take the time to consider the question and give an honest answer if you choose to respond.
originally posted by: Guidance.Is.Internal
a reply to: mOjOm
Why is this so hard to understand? People perform labor. Their labor is worth a certain amount of money on the market. Supply and demand. If you impose a minimum price for labor, people who's labor is worth less than the minimum wage will be unable to secure steady employment. You cry that this is unfair. Hiring them over someone who actually is worth the minimum wage is unfair to the more qualified person I would have to pass up. It's pretty clear you don't give a damn about them.