It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: yuppa
originally posted by: bullcat
originally posted by: yuppa
originally posted by: bullcat
Yet nobody hollared a pip when Israel shot the living daylights out of a ship carrying aid to Gaza.
YEah and it turns out they were right in doing so since they found weapons on board in the hold if i remember.
No doubt there is weapons on this one too then, just like the QE2 had American arms for the IRA.
Obviously not or they would not had RELEASED IT SO QUICKLY. If Iran found weapons on board they would had made a big deal out of it. HAman said they released it already apparently with no further incident.
According to "CNN" ? lol are you kidding me right now ?
originally posted by: yuppa
originally posted by: haman10
The ship was carrying the flag of marshall islands . they violated our waters by mistake and got apprehended . there is nothing special about this .
They are free as we speak .
Our Navy has very strict rules , even when UK Navy boat mistakenly violated our waters , they were arrested and later freed .
its common practice .
According to maritime maps they were right where they were supossed to be according to CNN and the company who monitors them from space by GPS. The Iranis TOLD THEM to follow them after firing a intimidation shot. Prolly to just inspect its cargo though. They could had just asked instead of firing a warning shot and the capt would had let them do a quick inspection to avoid a delay.
When they heard a US ship was coming they released the ship instead of risking a incident IF what you say about them being freed is correct.
originally posted by: TechniXcality
a reply to: haman10
That statement got under my skin it's your antagonistic and race card bull, you know what, let your leadership do some stupid # and see how long Iran exists beyond and American proxy state.
originally posted by: IAMTAT
originally posted by: yuppa
originally posted by: haman10
The ship was carrying the flag of marshall islands . they violated our waters by mistake and got apprehended . there is nothing special about this .
They are free as we speak .
Our Navy has very strict rules , even when UK Navy boat mistakenly violated our waters , they were arrested and later freed .
its common practice .
When they heard a US ship was coming they released the ship instead of risking a incident IF what you say about them being freed is correct.
This makes sense. The U.S. Destroyer was less than 60 miles from the cargo ship at the time of the incident and set course towards the event.
I'm still not clear as to whether or not the cargo ship actually violated Iranian waters.
Is there a boundary dispute in that area between what is claimed as sovereign or international?
originally posted by: yuppa
originally posted by: IAMTAT
originally posted by: yuppa
originally posted by: haman10
The ship was carrying the flag of marshall islands . they violated our waters by mistake and got apprehended . there is nothing special about this .
They are free as we speak .
Our Navy has very strict rules , even when UK Navy boat mistakenly violated our waters , they were arrested and later freed .
its common practice .
When they heard a US ship was coming they released the ship instead of risking a incident IF what you say about them being freed is correct.
This makes sense. The U.S. Destroyer was less than 60 miles from the cargo ship at the time of the incident and set course towards the event.
I'm still not clear as to whether or not the cargo ship actually violated Iranian waters.
Is there a boundary dispute in that area between what is claimed as sovereign or international?
Iran is like CHINA when it comes to claiming waterways. The PEople tracking the ship said it did not violate their territorial waters but those change according to the mood of the Iranians from day to day apparently lol!
originally posted by: Crumbles
a reply to: intrptr
Hate to break it to you my man, but the middle east has never been at peace. It has been at a constant state of war for some time.
originally posted by: TechniXcality
a reply to: haman10
That statement got under my skin it's your antagonistic and race card bull, you know what, let your leadership do some stupid # and see how long Iran exists beyond and American proxy state.
originally posted by: crazyewok
originally posted by: TechniXcality
a reply to: haman10
That statement got under my skin it's your antagonistic and race card bull, you know what, let your leadership do some stupid # and see how long Iran exists beyond and American proxy state.
Plus a country threatens to defend itself if attacked and you get irritated?
I mean FFS are country's not entailed to defend themselves if attacked? Or do they have to throw the red carpet out for us in the west?
LOL . alright there big boy .
originally posted by: TechniXcality
a reply to: haman10
That statement got under my skin it's your antagonistic and race card bull, you know what, let your leadership do some stupid # and see how long Iran exists beyond and American proxy state.
So is the BBC American officials have denied media reports that a US cargo ship had been seized by the Iranian navy.
originally posted by: darkbake
(Reuters) - Iranian forces boarded a Marshall Islands-flagged cargo ship in the Gulf on Tuesday after patrol boats fired warning shots across its bow and ordered it deeper into Iranian waters, the Pentagon said.
U.S. planes and a destroyer were monitoring the situation after the vessel, the MV Maersk Tigris, made a distress call in the Strait of Hormuz, one of the world's most important oil shipping channels.
Reuters
Reuters tracking data showed the Maersk Tigris, a 65,000-tonne container ship, off the Iranian coast between the islands of Qeshm and Hormuz. It had been listed as sailing from the Saudi port of Jeddah, bound for the United Arab Emirates port of Jebel Ali.
originally posted by: AllSourceIntel
originally posted by: darkbake
(Reuters) - Iranian forces boarded a Marshall Islands-flagged cargo ship in the Gulf on Tuesday after patrol boats fired warning shots across its bow and ordered it deeper into Iranian waters, the Pentagon said.
U.S. planes and a destroyer were monitoring the situation after the vessel, the MV Maersk Tigris, made a distress call in the Strait of Hormuz, one of the world's most important oil shipping channels.
Reuters
Last paragraph:
Reuters tracking data showed the Maersk Tigris, a 65,000-tonne container ship, off the Iranian coast between the islands of Qeshm and Hormuz. It had been listed as sailing from the Saudi port of Jeddah, bound for the United Arab Emirates port of Jebel Ali.
If that is where she was when this started, she certainly was in Iranian TTW ... but that is also the route they would take en route Bandar-e Abbas
originally posted by: Sublimecraft
a reply to: IAMTAT
There is only 2 types of ships in the region - Military and Merchant Tankers / general cargo.
IF true, this could only be a merchant vessel as no-one is stupid enough to fire on a US Navy vessel (it would not be "escorted" anywhere let me give you the tip)
The US Navy is in the region, as are US owned / flagged merchant vessels.
I GUARANTEE the vessel in question has breached sovereign waters and is now paying the price under IMO (International Maritime Organization) protocols.
Prepare for BS propaganda to say otherwise, but I HAVE vessels in the region too and the US are ship-stirrers around the Strait of Hormuz - have been "testing the waters" for a while now.
Pun intended.
originally posted by: haman10
(Reuters) - Iranian forces boarded a Marshall Islands-flagged cargo ship in the Gulf on Tuesday after patrol boats fired warning shots across its bow and ordered it deeper into Iranian waters, the Pentagon said.
Now my english might not be perfect , but i think "deeper into Iranian waters" means it was already in Iranian waters .
That being said , Iranian officials confirmed that they intercepted the cargo because it violated our waters .
I really don't know whats all this fuss about
Such as ? which illegally claimed water ?
originally posted by: NavyDoc
originally posted by: Sublimecraft
a reply to: IAMTAT
There is only 2 types of ships in the region - Military and Merchant Tankers / general cargo.
IF true, this could only be a merchant vessel as no-one is stupid enough to fire on a US Navy vessel (it would not be "escorted" anywhere let me give you the tip)
The US Navy is in the region, as are US owned / flagged merchant vessels.
I GUARANTEE the vessel in question has breached sovereign waters and is now paying the price under IMO (International Maritime Organization) protocols.
Prepare for BS propaganda to say otherwise, but I HAVE vessels in the region too and the US are ship-stirrers around the Strait of Hormuz - have been "testing the waters" for a while now.
Pun intended.
That's incorrect. Iran for a long time has illegally claimed waters that are by international law areas of "safe passage" due to them being part of the straits of Hormuz. Iran has done stuff like this before.