Second Fake Dutch Moon Rock Given To The Queen Of The Netherlands By Apollo 11 Crew!

originally posted by: Shamrock6
a reply to: TheWhisper

More links to yourself. With articles you refuse to provide an actual translation for, rather than your own paraphrasing and summary.

Do you get dizzy with all the circles you run? This is like talking to a wall. Or a Dutch dike, perhaps.

Irrelevant all what is said is backed by newspaper articles. TW has debunked your claims and we have much more information about fake moon rocks in the Netherlands.

a reply to: TheWhisper
But no second source saying the queen received a rock from the astronauts.
No indication that the prince received anything any different that the 134 other countries did.
No reason why the museum would not display a large moon rock if the prince gave it to them.
A claim that the Apollo 17 rock is not on display.

Nothing. Except a couple of newspaper articles about different things. And only a bit of discussion about one "fake" moon rock, which was a piece of petrified wood of uncertain provenance.

a reply to: TheWhisper

Your credibility is not irrelevant to anything you post. It's perfectly relevant.

You've debunked nothing. At all. Period. All you've done is copy and paste, then twist and distort.

As for the "much more" you have: put up or shut up

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: TheWhisper
But no second source saying the queen received a rock from the astronauts.
No indication that the prince received anything any different that the 134 other countries did.
No reason why the museum would not display a large moon rock if the prince gave it to them.
No reason to claim that the Apollo 17 rock is not on display.

Nothing. Except a couple of newspaper articles about different things.

All what you say is already debunked. You really need to do research that is the way. Maybe that tiny Dutch website is a good start all you said here is already debunked on that website.

a reply to: TheWhisper

All what you say is already debunked.

No. Nothing you have said has been substantiated.

Maybe that tiny Dutch website is a good start all you said here is already debunked on that website.

No. No clicks for you. You can keep posting your bits of bullcrap here. That's what Skunk Works is for.

originally posted by: TheWhisper

originally posted by: onebigmonkey
Oh Adrian you really do need to stop pretending you can do research.

Your story about the so-called third moon rock is nonsense.

All you have found is a newspaper report about what analysis of the Apollo 11 samples show, and it mentions that the official sample given to Holland that was donated to a Dutch museum. The image it uses is a stock image of a lunar sample (some of which were quite big, despite what you claim). Why not translate all of the article for us if you think I am unfairly representing what it says?

This is not news - everyone knows this, and either you are incapable of understanding your own language or you are deliberately and dishonestly misinterpreting the newspaper report. The report, by the way, does not correct the claim that the lunar rocks were collected by Apollo 11. By your own standard this means that Apollo 11 landed on the moon.

Next you'll be telling us that they donated an Apollo 17 rock as well.

TW only rleases the information and when we tell you that more fake moon rocks are under investigation you will be shocked. This is not looking good for NASA.

Someone is not telling the truth and it starts with a N...

Again, We've heard that bedtime story before.

Someone doesn't have a clue what he's talking about and his name starts with A.

Or L.

Or T

Dependimg on which alias you are using, that is.

Closed for staff review.