Disclosure of the Moon Landing Hoax: Part 2

a reply to: Soylent Green Is People

Are you kidding me? It cuts right before it shows house rock. Holy crap!!?? This is becoming nonsensical

a reply to: bobbypurify

It doesn't matter what you say because you have already shown you dont have a clue re photography or video.

a reply to: wmd_2008

I'm not the one that sees a 2-D rock that doesn't change perspective and claim it does. that video makes your side squirm. It shows production of a set. Lol, this is just going to get better! Buckle up

DP

originally posted by: bobbypurify
a reply to: bobbypurify

House rock in the rover footage is a cut out cardboard photo placed between the rover cam and the fake backdrop.

Myth


BUSTED!!

a reply to: bobbypurify

Explain tne change in position of the house rock in OBM's gif acting like a petulant child makes you a full paid up member of the hoax crowd

a reply to: wmd_2008

Already did. This one is history and proof you're grasping for anything now. The rock never performs a 3-dimensional perspective change as the rover crosses from its left to right side. Giving us the conclusion it's 2-D. It's just separate from the background. A change of scene noticed by the cuts in film. "We are headed to house rock" and they place a cardboad photo on the set then cut again. It's all there. This one is over

a reply to: bobbypurify

The poor guy in the YouTube vid just came up with a smidgen of a wrong conclusion, including house rock as part of the back drop. But kudos to his eyes for noticing forgery in the Apollo record. He just didn't notice the mountain boulders moving behind the house rock as the rover sped by. Soyant did and kudos to him too. Now, it just wasn't a fixture in the back drop and had to be added to the set.

originally posted by: bobbypurify
a reply to: bobbypurify

The poor guy in the YouTube vid just came up with a smidgen of a wrong conclusion, including house rock as part of the back drop. But kudos to his eyes for noticing forgery in the Apollo record. He just didn't notice the mountain boulders moving behind the house rock as the rover sped by. Soyant did and kudos to him too. Now, it just wasn't a fixture in the back drop and had to be added to the set.

You still don't understand. There couldn't have been a backdrop because the individual landmarks all the way to the horizon all change perspective as the camera moves. That's a hell of a lot more than a "smidgen of a wrong conclusion." The entire premise of the video is wrong. Additionally, you've been show images of the rock where there is absolutely no question that the perspective changes.

a reply to: DelMarvel

Look, I get that you're holding strong, really I do. But, go for a drive today and pass by anything where you start on one side then pass all the way past it's far side. EVERYTHING has a complete perspective change. That rock doesn't change perspectively at all in any gif anywhere from the 16mm footage. It may change color a bit and position somehow but never its perspective. That, my friend, is impossible.

a reply to: bobbypurify

Plus, we know its dimension. That footage, if it were a real rock, couldn't have been far away. We should have seen a near 270 degree panorama of that son of a bish

And at the very, very least 180 degree

a reply to: bobbypurify

Why do you think the footage cuts right before and after? Well, I'll tell you. Because it would have exposed both ways that it's flat, 2-D.

a reply to: bobbypurify

OBM posted the original footage that shows there was no cut.

I guess you didn't bother to look at it.

a reply to: DelMarvel

Please repost. I must have missed it and I'd love to examine it. Where is it?

a reply to: bobbypurify

And once again, if you can't see it separately you can take the two stills posted by Soylent Green on page 39 and view them stereoscopically either by free viewing or with some sort of viewer and see a three d image of the rock.

originally posted by: bobbypurify
a reply to: DelMarvel

Please repost. I must have missed it and I'd love to examine it. Where is it?

Page 43 post by One Big Monkey..11:51 AM.

a reply to: DelMarvel

You guys know what a cut is, right? I saw plenty in the brief footage I watched. What part of that video is different from the HD vid Soyant posted, only pertaining to the 16mm footage of house rock

originally posted by: bobbypurify
a reply to: DelMarvel

You guys know what a cut is, right? I saw plenty in the brief footage I watched. What part of that video is different from the HD vid Soyant posted, only pertaining to the 16mm footage of house rock

Go to the 1:01:57 point of that video Monkey posted. It's a continuous shot going past the rock without the edit you keep going on about. Absolute proof that the cut was made by the hoax believer who made the video you posted. How many times do people have to tell you? Do you have some kind of major comprehension issue or are you just trolling?

a reply to: DelMarvel

Sigh, the same first cut is there. Then, it continues past, never showing the rock again. The other video just ended because the remaining footage is without the 2-D cutout. Lol, busted, yet again. Both vids start at the same point. One just ends after they make their point, the other keeps driving in a circle. Thanks for making my point clear. The same cut to the footage is still there. Are you trolling?

a reply to: bobbypurify

If you're talking about the cut before the rock even comes into view then you've completely changed the goalposts from the "glitch" you were talking about on page 40. You have to have seen that wasn't originally there and if you started talking about something else without acknowledging that you just confused the issue. I don't think you're having an honest discussion.