It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
At the heart of the tale are several men, leaders of the Canadian mining industry, who have been major donors to the charitable endeavors of former President Bill Clinton and his family. Members of that group built, financed and eventually sold off to the Russians a company that would become known as Uranium One.
As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation. Uranium One’s chairman used his family foundation to make four donations totaling $2.35 million. Those contributions were not publicly disclosed by the Clintons, despite an agreement Mrs. Clinton had struck with the Obama White House to publicly identify all donors. Other people with ties to the company made donations as well.
As the Russians gradually assumed control of Uranium One in three separate transactions from 2009 to 2013, Canadian records show, a flow of cash made its way to the Clinton Foundation.
This really has been the particular case of the Clinton Cash that bothers me the most and that should bother voters the most. We now have a uranium company that is control of 20 percent of the uranium mining in North America—that’s owned by the Russians. This deal had to be approved by Hillary Clinton and it turns out that the stockholders in that company gave $145 million to Hillary Clinton’s foundation. I can’t imagine how she could be a part of the decision-making process while she received so much money in her foundation—$145 million.
originally posted by: the owlbear
So...Russians buy a company...give money to the Clinton foundation. No Clinton is in any kind of political power to help or seal the business deal.
Why is this a bfd?
originally posted by: Gully
Rand Paul wants an investigation.
Source
This really has been the particular case of the Clinton Cash that bothers me the most and that should bother voters the most. We now have a uranium company that is control of 20 percent of the uranium mining in North America—that’s owned by the Russians. This deal had to be approved by Hillary Clinton and it turns out that the stockholders in that company gave $145 million to Hillary Clinton’s foundation. I can’t imagine how she could be a part of the decision-making process while she received so much money in her foundation—$145 million.
originally posted by: the owlbear
originally posted by: Gully
Rand Paul wants an investigation.
Source
This really has been the particular case of the Clinton Cash that bothers me the most and that should bother voters the most. We now have a uranium company that is control of 20 percent of the uranium mining in North America—that’s owned by the Russians. This deal had to be approved by Hillary Clinton and it turns out that the stockholders in that company gave $145 million to Hillary Clinton’s foundation. I can’t imagine how she could be a part of the decision-making process while she received so much money in her foundation—$145 million.
Okay, Rand...we also have whole companies owned by Chinese, Japanese, and others operating and owning huge tracts of land in the US.
But that's all lazy faire economy, right?
If it were 'mericans screwing 'mericans it would be okay...
originally posted by: Answer
originally posted by: the owlbear
So...Russians buy a company...give money to the Clinton foundation. No Clinton is in any kind of political power to help or seal the business deal.
Why is this a bfd?
Russians donating money to the (at the time) Secretary of State's foundation and that doesn't seem the least bit suspicious to you?
originally posted by: Answer
originally posted by: the owlbear
originally posted by: Gully
Rand Paul wants an investigation.
Source
This really has been the particular case of the Clinton Cash that bothers me the most and that should bother voters the most. We now have a uranium company that is control of 20 percent of the uranium mining in North America—that’s owned by the Russians. This deal had to be approved by Hillary Clinton and it turns out that the stockholders in that company gave $145 million to Hillary Clinton’s foundation. I can’t imagine how she could be a part of the decision-making process while she received so much money in her foundation—$145 million.
Okay, Rand...we also have whole companies owned by Chinese, Japanese, and others operating and owning huge tracts of land in the US.
But that's all lazy faire economy, right?
If it were 'mericans screwing 'mericans it would be okay...
That's right, just deflect from the issue at hand instead of actually paying attention.
Typical.
originally posted by: the owlbear
originally posted by: Answer
originally posted by: the owlbear
So...Russians buy a company...give money to the Clinton foundation. No Clinton is in any kind of political power to help or seal the business deal.
Why is this a bfd?
Russians donating money to the (at the time) Secretary of State's foundation and that doesn't seem the least bit suspicious to you?
Considering the role of Secretary of State has little to do with business deals and there isnt any office to run for...no...I also see no other donations listed, THAT is what I find odd.
...
Considering the role of Secretary of State has little to do with business deals and there isnt any office to run for...no...I also see no other donations listed, THAT is what I find odd.
Uranium investors’ efforts to buy mining assets in Kazakhstan and the United States led to a takeover bid by a Russian state-owned energy company. The investors gave millions to the Clinton Foundation over the same period, while Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton’s office was involved with approving the Russian bid.
thesaker.is...
19th April 2015, Kiev – First stage of sale of Ukraine began: 342 objects from strategic reserve of Ukraine (about 3000 objects in reserve) be sold during several months. During previous 23 years of mass privatization, governments of Ukraine created and didn’t touch strategic reserve, because state companies from there giving income to state budget. But Kiev junta are agents of the sale of Ukraine. Ayvaras Abromavichus (real name Ayvar Abramovich) Lithuanian-Jewish “guest” in the government of Kiev junta preparing the first stage of the sale of Ukraine.
Translation of article from Kiev junta media, 17th April 2015:
“Abromavichus puts on sale the first state-owned enterprises in the near future”. Ayvaras Abromavichus, Minister of Economic Development of Ukraine plans to sell the first public companies in the coming months. He said it in the Peterson Institute for International Economics in Washington (USA), reports RBC-Ukraine. He also said which state-owned enterprises will be sold in the first place. “If we look at what will be most willing to put up for sale, it assets in the agricultural sector, such as” Ukrspirt”, grain elevators owned by State Grain Corporation, some companies in the energy sector, such as “Tsentrenergo” – he said. He added that some companies from the chemical industry will be sold. He said that the first companies to be sold over the next few months.” Source, Kiev media
originally posted by: Answer
originally posted by: the owlbear
originally posted by: Answer
originally posted by: the owlbear
So...Russians buy a company...give money to the Clinton foundation. No Clinton is in any kind of political power to help or seal the business deal.
Why is this a bfd?
Russians donating money to the (at the time) Secretary of State's foundation and that doesn't seem the least bit suspicious to you?
Considering the role of Secretary of State has little to do with business deals and there isnt any office to run for...no...I also see no other donations listed, THAT is what I find odd.
You underestimate Hillary's involvement with this deal...
Beyond mines in Kazakhstan that are among the most lucrative in the world, the sale gave the Russians control of one-fifth of all uranium production capacity in the United States. Since uranium is considered a strategic asset, with implications for national security, the deal had to be approved by a committee composed of representatives from a number of United States government agencies. Among the agencies that eventually signed off was the State Department, then headed by Mr. Clinton’s wife, Hillary Rodham Clinton.S ource
Deals involving Uranium don't just happen without the approval of the State Dept.
There's also this from the same article:
And shortly after the Russians announced their intention to acquire a majority stake in Uranium One, Mr. Clinton received $500,000 for a Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank with links to the Kremlin that was promoting Uranium One stock.
originally posted by: TinfoilTP
Hillary's goose is cooked.
The Clinton's could always weasel out of one scandal at a time, she is going to have dozens and get buried under it all.
originally posted by: the owlbear
originally posted by: TinfoilTP
Hillary's goose is cooked.
The Clinton's could always weasel out of one scandal at a time, she is going to have dozens and get buried under it all.
And?
Your life will change how?
Some Russians giving a donation to the Clinton Foundation affects you how?