It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Megatronus
I did read the holy books when i was a bit older and i have actually read the bible a few times but i have been left scratching my head everytime.
The discovery of the Ugaritic archives in 1929 has been of great significance to biblical scholarship, as these archives for the first time provided a detailed description of Canaanite religious beliefs, during the period directly preceding the Israelite settlement. These texts show significant parallels to Hebrew biblical literature, particularly in the areas of divine imagery and poetic form.
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: Megatronus
I did read the holy books when i was a bit older and i have actually read the bible a few times but i have been left scratching my head everytime.
Reading the bible as a non-believer is really interesting.
You really have to believe to think it makes any sense.
originally posted by: SuperFrog
a reply to: Annee
As Penn would say, best way to have someone become atheist, have him read complete bible and question what he is reading.
They did story some time ago, Penn and Teller - The Bible.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: Megatronus
I did read the holy books when i was a bit older and i have actually read the bible a few times but i have been left scratching my head everytime.
Reading the bible as a non-believer is really interesting.
You really have to believe to think it makes any sense.
I think that is also why many times bible passages are quoted instead of reading the whole story as one.
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: SuperFrog
a reply to: Annee
As Penn would say, best way to have someone become atheist, have him read complete bible and question what he is reading.
They did story some time ago, Penn and Teller - The Bible.
For sure.
I tried many churches on my quest of understanding.
A pastor picks a specific scripture - - then proceeds to tell you what it means.
Or you're told to read a specific scripture - - then you're told what it means.
Everyone has to think the same. So you are told what each scripture means.
The sad part is - - you believe what they tell you.
originally posted by: misskat1
Im still deprogramming, It might take another 50 to undo the brainwashing. So, Ive spent a vast amount of time wallowing in emotions that just suck, Fear of Gods reprisal if I question what I was taught, guilt and shame for thinking I could think with my own brain about it, ANGER for wasting sooooooo much time etc. I vacillated between putting my fingers in my ears and la la la dont want to hear it, and barely hanging onto the Hem of Jesus garment. I fervently clung with all the faith I could muster, regardless of the truth that was hitting me between the eyes like a hot iron.
What has helped you get through this process?
originally posted by: ketsuko
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: SuperFrog
a reply to: Annee
As Penn would say, best way to have someone become atheist, have him read complete bible and question what he is reading.
They did story some time ago, Penn and Teller - The Bible.
For sure.
I tried many churches on my quest of understanding.
A pastor picks a specific scripture - - then proceeds to tell you what it means.
Or you're told to read a specific scripture - - then you're told what it means.
Everyone has to think the same. So you are told what each scripture means.
The sad part is - - you believe what they tell you.
Understand that this is the same Penn who also recently said in an interview that gay weddings had to do with gay sex which is extraordinarily untrue.
originally posted by: SuperFrog
a reply to: TheCretinHop
Of course, what if science is wrong???
Dawkins was asked here the same question, his answer is reminder that is better not to ask if you are not ready to hear the answer...
originally posted by: ketsuko
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: Megatronus
I did read the holy books when i was a bit older and i have actually read the bible a few times but i have been left scratching my head everytime.
Reading the bible as a non-believer is really interesting.
You really have to believe to think it makes any sense.
I think that is also why many times bible passages are quoted instead of reading the whole story as one.
No that is usually done because it's much easier to construct the narrative you prefer out of a single sentence rather than taking the whole in context.
Most people A.) want to believe what they want to believe about it on both sides of the belief debate and B.) Absolutely suck at reading comprehension.
originally posted by: ketsuko
Understand that this is the same Penn who also recently said in an interview that gay weddings had to do with gay sex which is extraordinarily untrue.
I like Penn and Teller, but they aren't exactly what I would call definitive authorities on this or many other subjects.
And if you are going to get upset with the idea that pastor guides a congregation on what a scripture might mean, then why are you telling us we ought to take Penn and Teller's word for it? Isn't that sort of the same thing?
No that is usually done because it's much easier to construct the narrative you prefer out of a single sentence rather than taking the whole in context.
Taking things out of context changes the meaning of them.
Most people A.) want to believe what they want to believe about it on both sides of the belief debate and B.) Absolutely suck at reading comprehension.
Most people aren't researched enough on both sides of the debate to make an informed opinion.
I still believe in a Higher Power, and I am only beginning to grasp that IT can not fit into a Religious Box. But, the truth shall set you free!!!!!