UFOs Confront Soldiers During War, Says Ex-Air Force Intelligence Officer

a reply to: Scdfa

I believe your seeing what you want to see here. Its very pixelated, and they choose the best frame to stop and zoom. Plus take a moment to look at its scale in relation to its surroundings. Its too small to be anything more than a bird

Nope. This is great daylight footage of a flying saucer, you can clearly see the distortion in the air it leaves in its wake.

originally posted by: Scdfa
Nope. This is great daylight footage of a flying saucer, you can clearly see the distortion in the air it leaves in its wake.

What you are seeing is motion blur from flapping wings. Real flying saucers don't have flappy wings.

originally posted by: Scdfa
Nope. This is great daylight footage of a flying saucer, you can clearly see the distortion in the air it leaves in its wake.

Its called motion blur from the camera. Nothing more.

originally posted by: Scdfa
Nope. This is great daylight footage of a flying saucer, you can clearly see the distortion in the air it leaves in its wake.

Your statement has an air of sarcasm to it. Almost as if your laughing. Have you been joshing us the whole time


Maybe I'm just reading into something that isn't there, like you.

originally posted by: In4ormant

originally posted by: Scdfa
Nope. This is great daylight footage of a flying saucer, you can clearly see the distortion in the air it leaves in its wake.

Your statement has an air of sarcasm to it. Almost as if your laughing. Have you been joshing us the whole time

Maybe I'm just reading into something that isn't there, like you.

Believe it or not, I have seen this happen. Thread after thread on microscopic Martians. Never breaking character until they got caught manipulating a photo. I mean, they took everyone for a ride with circular arguing for a couple of years at least. it never occurred to me that they were just messing with people. Just to warn you, every time I bring up something that suggests this with this one, the attacks on me ramp up. Hope you got think internet skin!

originally posted by: ZetaRediculian

originally posted by: In4ormant

originally posted by: Scdfa
Nope. This is great daylight footage of a flying saucer, you can clearly see the distortion in the air it leaves in its wake.

Your statement has an air of sarcasm to it. Almost as if your laughing. Have you been joshing us the whole time

Maybe I'm just reading into something that isn't there, like you.

Believe it or not, I have seen this happen. Thread after thread on microscopic Martians. Never breaking character until they got caught manipulating a photo. I mean, they took everyone for a ride with circular arguing for a couple of years at least. it never occurred to me that they were just messing with people. Just to warn you, every time I bring up something that suggests this with this one, the attacks on me ramp up. Hope you got think internet skin!

It needs a name. We shall call it the Colbert Conundrum

a reply to: Scdfa

Thank you, just call it as I see it. So much more to this phenomena than meets the eye. Aside all naysayers, and aside how much of a fool they've made me feel, I maintain this truth because I have experienced this directly, as a child no less. And as I sit here, sober and lucid, I experienced something that I'll be damned if someone shrugs off as psychiatric disorders or nonsense! Science has so much more to learn, fantastic things, intense, reality-shattering knowledge. These are not beings from outer space... from what I understand. We've been around as a loose race, for a million years +, Gobekli Tepe 12,000 years ago. What on earth came before us? 3,000 years from now, all metal would have rusted, all plastics corroded, all that will be left of our presence on this planet is Mount-friggin'-Rushmore. Makes you think.

originally posted by: Subaeruginosa
a reply to: Aquariusdude

It's on the same tv series. Clearly there scraping the bottom of the barrel now, not that it was ever really a very credible or interesting show.

Personally, I don't know why people even pay any attention to these witness reports of UFO's anymore. People lie, sometimes very convincingly. Show me photo evidence or I'm not interested.

Billy Meier published photos and film, and it worked against his claims. I was always suspicious of his story because he stated that the ETs encouraged him to film their craft, but never had any photos of the ETs or his conversation with any of them. In any case, that would be nothing more than circumstantial evidence and not hard evidence. In the book "Light Years" by Gary Kinder an IBM chemist, Marcel Vogel, allegedly examined a metallic sample of Meier's. Vogel claimed that another metal sample he examined contained nearly every element in the periodic table stating, "Each pure element was bonded to each of the others, yet somehow retained its own identity." At 2500x magnification, Vogel claims the sample was, "... metal, but at the same time ... it is crystal!"

Looking Dr Vogel's professional history I found that he held 32 patents, including one for the 'magnetic coating' used to store information on hard drive disks. He also had some personal interest in esoterica and the occult, which is likely behind his interest in Meier's metal and crystal samples.

For me, Vogel's personal interests and motivations seem to out strip his professional credibility when it comes to Meier's material evidence, which is said to be the result of ET technology. How unfortunate that Meier didn't get a second and third opinion from qualified scientists, who could have collaborated and published their findings.

a reply to: In4ormant

Since you are fresh on the scene (based on your bio)....
Your impertinent responses speak to the main problem we at ATS have here,...

You are dismissing footage with technical words as if that alone will make us go away...

Please pay the ATS community with a modicum of respect and actually BE HERE AWHILE before you shoot stuff down....

That being said, Vietnam footage of strangeness should be given a little more respect... and your explanations are quite frankly,... LAME...I also notice you are responding in short little quips of no substance...the mark of a shill...

originally posted by: coastlinekid
a reply to: In4ormant

Since you are fresh on the scene (based on your bio)....
Your impertinent responses speak to the main problem we at ATS have here,...

You are dismissing footage with technical words as if that alone will make us go away...

Please pay the ATS community with a modicum of respect and actually BE HERE AWHILE before you shoot stuff down....

That being said, Vietnam footage of strangeness should be given a little more respect... and your explanations are quite frankly,... LAME...I also notice you are responding in short little quips of no substance...the mark of a shill...

Well said, coastlinekid. You nailed it. Classic shillery in action.

This second clip is the real deal, in my opinion, I've seen this type of craft as close as you'd want to get to it. Closer than that, even.

Yes, the quality of the footage sucks, but so did every TV show before HD came into vogue. This is shot on film, not videotape, and the UFO was not the point of focus for the cameraman, obviously,
Add to that the fact that these alien vehicles are surrounded by a slight field of distortion while the vehicles are in operation, similar to the shimmering of a heat mirage on a hot road.
These factors all add up to pretty poor picture quality, unfortunately.

But it is an astonishing clip. People keep waiting for genuine footage of an alien UFO? Well here it is.

And what fool could fall for the "blurred bird" excuse? I think we have all seen our fair share of birds, I know I have, and this ain't one of them.

This is the real deal. Stop waiting for better and study it, It will help you to determine the authenticity of other ufo footage.

- Bear in mind I'm not referring to the first clip -

a reply to: Scdfa

Well you are certainly confirmed in your opinion.

Perhaps you should read this thread, for your interest.

www.abovetopsecret.com...

originally posted by: gort51
a reply to: Scdfa

Well you are certainly confirmed in your opinion.

Perhaps you should read this thread, for your interest.

www.abovetopsecret.com...

I've seen it all, thanks. What does that photo have in common with this film footage, other than the prosaic excuse offered is the same?
Are you suggesting that every daylight UFO is a bird? Or that a photograph is equivalent to film footage?

a reply to: Scdfa
I think he is suggesting that you read the thread and learn how to identify "blurds" which you had no clue what that even meant a few posts ago. The proper response is "Thanks for the link".

a reply to: ZetaRediculian

I think he is suggesting that you read the thread and learn how to identify "blurds" which you had no clue what that even meant a few posts ago.

Are you a little slow or are you just pretending? I'm familiar with the term. I was being witty when I said this :

"I looked up the word 'blurd', turns out it's a combination of 'blarney' and 'absurd'."

An intelligent person would have understood that. Try to keep up, or let the grown-ups talk. Now troll along, please.

a reply to: Scdfa

A "blurd" just means blurry bird which is what the video is. Most MUFOs know that. Are you disagreeing?

originally posted by: ZetaRediculian
a reply to: Scdfa

A "blurd" just means blurry bird which is what the video is. Most MUFOs know that. Are you disagreeing?

Well, now we know you're not pretending.

originally posted by: Scdfa

originally posted by: ZetaRediculian
a reply to: Scdfa

A "blurd" just means blurry bird which is what the video is. Most MUFOs know that. Are you disagreeing?

Well, now we know you're not pretending.

You have honestly lost me. I don't mean to distract from your insults but what exactly are you talking about? Because I think we are agreeing.

originally posted by: Scdfa

originally posted by: draknoir2

originally posted by: Scdfa

originally posted by: ZetaRediculian
a reply to: InhaleExhale

What really is appalling is that believers wont hesitate to promote their beliefs even in the name of dead servicemen who gave their lives. This is a case where servicemen died and it was blamed on a UFO. The question was raised about drug use and I showed the actual information about how it was rampant in Viet Nam. So it looks like we have an incident where half of the witnesses were possibly on heroin or other drugs that have been implicated in friendly fire incidents and where people died but lets blame UFOs piloted by aliens? What were their family members told? Those men died fighting for their country not to promote UFOs and lets not ask any questions about it? Who should be ashamed? The whole story is a sad testimony to the convoluted thought process of believers. Pathetic.

Pathetic isn't a strong enough word for people like this poster, so eager to prop up his argument that he's willing to disgrace our Viet Nam era servicemen.

"So it looks like we have an incident where half of the witnesses were possibly on heroin or other drugs", Zeta says, without a shred of evidence to support it.

How low can these deniers go?

It's a sad testimony, alright.

What's pathetic is your inability to type "Vietnam War drug use" into a web browser.

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...

Another ghoul willing to denigrate brave American servicemen who died in combat. I may have to stop posting here. Which is what these "people" want anyway.

If only you would.

Show me your service record and I'll show you mine... and my father's... and his father's... and my mother's father's...


Idiot.

originally posted by: Scdfa

originally posted by: draknoir2

originally posted by: Scdfa

But be very wary of people who seem to have a vested interest in denial, obfuscation, and what appears to be disinformation. Make no mistake, some of these opponents to aliens and abductions are far too intelligent to really believe their own claims of denial, they know full well that alien contact and abductions are completely real. Of course, many of the others are simply too deeply indoctrinated.

I think it's just your own claims they have a problem believing.

originally posted by: Scdfa
Be well.

Walgreens changed their policy and you don't have to say that anymore.

originally posted by: Scdfa
Call your Mom and Dad and tell them you love them, every single day.

My son also works at McDonalds so we don't have to do this to get the free meals. Good luck with the McLovin' promotion, though... and keep up the Fight for Fifteen!

There's no plastic surgery for an ugly soul. I only hope son takes after his mom. Or his dad.

I see what you did there. You implied my wife was unfaithful and my son illegitimate.

Just a friendly suggestion: if you should ever happen to leave you mom's basement and venture out into the real world you should be a bit more careful of what you say when interacting with strangers.