UFOs Confront Soldiers During War, Says Ex-Air Force Intelligence Officer

originally posted by: ZetaRediculian
a reply to: Scdfa

Now you change your claim to I IMPLIED "aliens are here because I know they are here"? Pure bull. Your credibility?

"Aliens are here", I've said that. And "I know aliens are here", I've said that.

I've made it very clear that I know aliens are here because I have had first hand contact with them. That's how I know aliens are here, and I've never said anything to the contrary.

Ohhhhh! I get it now! you said "I know aliens are here because I have had first hand contact with them" not "aliens are here because I know they are here"

Is condescending gibberish your first language?

Its all in the sentence structure apparently. Both statements are true but when combined....utterly false.

a reply to: InhaleExhale

What really is appalling is that believers wont hesitate to promote their beliefs even in the name of dead servicemen who gave their lives. This is a case where servicemen died and it was blamed on a UFO. The question was raised about drug use and I showed the actual information about how it was rampant in Viet Nam. So it looks like we have an incident where half of the witnesses were possibly on heroin or other drugs that have been implicated in friendly fire incidents and where people died but lets blame UFOs piloted by aliens? What were their family members told? Those men died fighting for their country not to promote UFOs and lets not ask any questions about it? Who should be ashamed? The whole story is a sad testimony to the convoluted thought process of believers. Pathetic.

originally posted by: Scdfa
a reply to: Elementalist

The TRUE ANSWER about ET and UFO, is WE HAVE NO IDEA. Not one of this keyboard warriors in this thread HONESTLY know anything about this subject nor it's natures.

Speak for yourself, please. Some of us have been aboard these ships.

Myself included, sir.

But I still don't know; who, what, where when, why.

So it will become a short memory... my life has deffinately moved on

Sorry to upset ya mate

a reply to: Elementalist

You say yourself included but then go on to say you don't know who,what,when,where,why. How can you say both?

This is what erks me. People defend their unknown experience to the death without actually knowing what it was. Why are so many people willing to fall on that sword.

a reply to: JadeStar

Jadestar anytime you want you can U2U, i have no problem with that, just keep in mind I am mexican and my english is not perfect.

Any question you may want to ask i will be glad to answer.

a reply to: In4ormant
My take on it is that people who question their own experiences are more believable and sincere. Personally if I had such an experience, not only would I question it, I certainly wouldn't expect or even demand anyone to believe me. The only people I would expect to believe me would be people that are willing to believe anything that supports their already established beliefs. Then that would just be taking advantage of them and then I really wouldn't want those people believing me anyway. Not if I was really looking for answers. Even if I was 100% positive I was contacted by aliens, the last thing I would do would be to act like a nut case on an internet forum.

originally posted by: ZetaRediculian
a reply to: InhaleExhale

What really is appalling is that believers wont hesitate to promote their beliefs even in the name of dead servicemen who gave their lives. This is a case where servicemen died and it was blamed on a UFO. The question was raised about drug use and I showed the actual information about how it was rampant in Viet Nam. So it looks like we have an incident where half of the witnesses were possibly on heroin or other drugs that have been implicated in friendly fire incidents and where people died but lets blame UFOs piloted by aliens? What were their family members told? Those men died fighting for their country not to promote UFOs and lets not ask any questions about it? Who should be ashamed? The whole story is a sad testimony to the convoluted thought process of believers. Pathetic.

Pathetic isn't a strong enough word for people like this poster, so eager to prop up his argument that he's willing to disgrace our Viet Nam era servicemen.

"So it looks like we have an incident where half of the witnesses were possibly on heroin or other drugs", Zeta says, without a shred of evidence to support it.

How low can these deniers go?

It's a sad testimony, alright.

originally posted by: Scdfa

originally posted by: ZetaRediculian
a reply to: InhaleExhale

What really is appalling is that believers wont hesitate to promote their beliefs even in the name of dead servicemen who gave their lives. This is a case where servicemen died and it was blamed on a UFO. The question was raised about drug use and I showed the actual information about how it was rampant in Viet Nam. So it looks like we have an incident where half of the witnesses were possibly on heroin or other drugs that have been implicated in friendly fire incidents and where people died but lets blame UFOs piloted by aliens? What were their family members told? Those men died fighting for their country not to promote UFOs and lets not ask any questions about it? Who should be ashamed? The whole story is a sad testimony to the convoluted thought process of believers. Pathetic.

Pathetic isn't a strong enough word for people like this poster, so eager to prop up his argument that he's willing to disgrace our Viet Nam era servicemen.

"So it looks like we have an incident where half of the witnesses were possibly on heroin or other drugs", Zeta says, without a shred of evidence to support it.

How low can these deniers go?

It's a sad testimony, alright.

No one is actually denying anything because up to this point none of you have proven anything to deny. Most are trying to understand how so many of you cling so tightly and require so little to be led by a leash

originally posted by: In4ormant

originally posted by: ZetaRediculian
a reply to: Scdfa

Now you change your claim to I IMPLIED "aliens are here because I know they are here"? Pure bull. Your credibility?

"Aliens are here", I've said that. And "I know aliens are here", I've said that.

I've made it very clear that I know aliens are here because I have had first hand contact with them. That's how I know aliens are here, and I've never said anything to the contrary.

Ohhhhh! I get it now! you said "I know aliens are here because I have had first hand contact with them" not "aliens are here because I know they are here"

Is condescending gibberish your first language?

Its all in the sentence structure apparently. Both statements are true but when combined....utterly false.

The English language is a wonderful thing. It really isn't all that complicated, and it is a very effective means of communication.

I'm not sure where your confusion stems from, or what exactly your accusations are based on. I have stated repeatedly that I know aliens are here because I have encountered them directly.

So, if you have a point, please, by all means, try to make it clear.

originally posted by: Scdfa

originally posted by: In4ormant

originally posted by: ZetaRediculian
a reply to: Scdfa

Now you change your claim to I IMPLIED "aliens are here because I know they are here"? Pure bull. Your credibility?

"Aliens are here", I've said that. And "I know aliens are here", I've said that.

I've made it very clear that I know aliens are here because I have had first hand contact with them. That's how I know aliens are here, and I've never said anything to the contrary.

Ohhhhh! I get it now! you said "I know aliens are here because I have had first hand contact with them" not "aliens are here because I know they are here"

Is condescending gibberish your first language?

Its all in the sentence structure apparently. Both statements are true but when combined....utterly false.

The English language is a wonderful thing. It really isn't all that complicated, and it is a very effective means of communication.

I'm not sure where your confusion stems from, or what exactly your accusations are based on. I have stated repeatedly that I know aliens are here because I have encountered them directly.

So, if you have a point, please, by all means, try to make it clear.

I was referring to your semantically challenged exchange with Cuckhooold earlier.

a reply to: Scdfa

A well scripted fairy tale is still one nonetheless

originally posted by: Scdfa

originally posted by: ZetaRediculian
a reply to: InhaleExhale

What really is appalling is that believers wont hesitate to promote their beliefs even in the name of dead servicemen who gave their lives. This is a case where servicemen died and it was blamed on a UFO. The question was raised about drug use and I showed the actual information about how it was rampant in Viet Nam. So it looks like we have an incident where half of the witnesses were possibly on heroin or other drugs that have been implicated in friendly fire incidents and where people died but lets blame UFOs piloted by aliens? What were their family members told? Those men died fighting for their country not to promote UFOs and lets not ask any questions about it? Who should be ashamed? The whole story is a sad testimony to the convoluted thought process of believers. Pathetic.

Pathetic isn't a strong enough word for people like this poster, so eager to prop up his argument that he's willing to disgrace our Viet Nam era servicemen.

"So it looks like we have an incident where half of the witnesses were possibly on heroin or other drugs", Zeta says, without a shred of evidence to support it.

How low can these deniers go?

It's a sad testimony, alright.

What's pathetic is your inability to type "Vietnam War drug use" into a web browser.

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...

originally posted by: In4ormant

originally posted by: Scdfa

originally posted by: ZetaRediculian
a reply to: InhaleExhale

What really is appalling is that believers wont hesitate to promote their beliefs even in the name of dead servicemen who gave their lives. This is a case where servicemen died and it was blamed on a UFO. The question was raised about drug use and I showed the actual information about how it was rampant in Viet Nam. So it looks like we have an incident where half of the witnesses were possibly on heroin or other drugs that have been implicated in friendly fire incidents and where people died but lets blame UFOs piloted by aliens? What were their family members told? Those men died fighting for their country not to promote UFOs and lets not ask any questions about it? Who should be ashamed? The whole story is a sad testimony to the convoluted thought process of believers. Pathetic.

Pathetic isn't a strong enough word for people like this poster, so eager to prop up his argument that he's willing to disgrace our Viet Nam era servicemen.

"So it looks like we have an incident where half of the witnesses were possibly on heroin or other drugs", Zeta says, without a shred of evidence to support it.

How low can these deniers go?

It's a sad testimony, alright.

No one is actually denying anything because up to this point none of you have proven anything to deny. Most are trying to understand how so many of you cling so tightly and require so little to be led by a leash

So are you actually stating that a theory, or proposition, or statement of fact, must be proven in order for others to deny it?

That is simply incorrect.

These words have definitions.

a reply to: Scdfa

Pathetic isn't a strong enough word for people like this poster, so eager to prop up his argument that he's willing to disgrace our Viet Nam era servicemen.

What argument? People died in combat? What in the world does that have to do with your beliefs in aliens? You want to believe they were killed by aliens? Well, that's sad.

"So it looks like we have an incident where half of the witnesses were possibly on heroin or other drugs", Zeta says, without a shred of evidence to support it.

Yes, they were possibly on heroin. I posted a link and quoted it twice. That doesn't help support your beliefs so you will ignore it, deny it and insult anyone that gets in your way. I really haven't found your low yet but you are getting there.

originally posted by: draknoir2

originally posted by: Scdfa

originally posted by: ZetaRediculian
a reply to: InhaleExhale

What really is appalling is that believers wont hesitate to promote their beliefs even in the name of dead servicemen who gave their lives. This is a case where servicemen died and it was blamed on a UFO. The question was raised about drug use and I showed the actual information about how it was rampant in Viet Nam. So it looks like we have an incident where half of the witnesses were possibly on heroin or other drugs that have been implicated in friendly fire incidents and where people died but lets blame UFOs piloted by aliens? What were their family members told? Those men died fighting for their country not to promote UFOs and lets not ask any questions about it? Who should be ashamed? The whole story is a sad testimony to the convoluted thought process of believers. Pathetic.

Pathetic isn't a strong enough word for people like this poster, so eager to prop up his argument that he's willing to disgrace our Viet Nam era servicemen.

"So it looks like we have an incident where half of the witnesses were possibly on heroin or other drugs", Zeta says, without a shred of evidence to support it.

How low can these deniers go?

It's a sad testimony, alright.

What's pathetic is your inability to type "Vietnam War drug use" into a web browser.

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov...

Another ghoul willing to denigrate brave American servicemen who died in combat. I may have to stop posting here. Which is what these "people" want anyway.

a reply to: Scdfa

I'm stating that you and others gave given me nothing to deny. And its called peer review. Look it up. You wouldn't bother because your "evidence" requires none for validation.

originally posted by: ZetaRediculian
a reply to: Scdfa

Pathetic isn't a strong enough word for people like this poster, so eager to prop up his argument that he's willing to disgrace our Viet Nam era servicemen.

What argument? People died in combat? What in the world does that have to do with your beliefs in aliens? You want to believe they were killed by aliens? Well, that's sad.

"So it looks like we have an incident where half of the witnesses were possibly on heroin or other drugs", Zeta says, without a shred of evidence to support it.

Yes, they were possibly on heroin. I posted a link and quoted it twice. That doesn't help support your beliefs so you will ignore it, deny it and insult anyone that gets in your way. I really haven't found your low yet but you are getting there.

Responding to you IS my low. I don't plan on sinking to it again.

And let's make your BS nice and clear, you have absolutely no evidence that any serviceman involved in this incident was on heroin. Isn't that correct?

originally posted by: In4ormant
a reply to: Scdfa

I'm stating that you and others gave given me nothing to deny. And its called peer review. Look it up. You wouldn't bother because your "evidence" requires none for validation.

Peer review is in no way a prerequisite to deny any statement or theory. Nor does peer review have any bearing on a statement being true or false. Look it up yourself.

originally posted by: In4ormant

originally posted by: Scdfa

originally posted by: In4ormant

originally posted by: ZetaRediculian
a reply to: Scdfa

Now you change your claim to I IMPLIED "aliens are here because I know they are here"? Pure bull. Your credibility?

"Aliens are here", I've said that. And "I know aliens are here", I've said that.

I've made it very clear that I know aliens are here because I have had first hand contact with them. That's how I know aliens are here, and I've never said anything to the contrary.

Ohhhhh! I get it now! you said "I know aliens are here because I have had first hand contact with them" not "aliens are here because I know they are here"

Is condescending gibberish your first language?

Its all in the sentence structure apparently. Both statements are true but when combined....utterly false.

The English language is a wonderful thing. It really isn't all that complicated, and it is a very effective means of communication.

I'm not sure where your confusion stems from, or what exactly your accusations are based on. I have stated repeatedly that I know aliens are here because I have encountered them directly.

So, if you have a point, please, by all means, try to make it clear.

I was referring to your semantically challenged exchange with Cuckhooold earlier.

So then you don't have a point?

originally posted by: Scdfa

originally posted by: ZetaRediculian
a reply to: Scdfa

Pathetic isn't a strong enough word for people like this poster, so eager to prop up his argument that he's willing to disgrace our Viet Nam era servicemen.

What argument? People died in combat? What in the world does that have to do with your beliefs in aliens? You want to believe they were killed by aliens? Well, that's sad.

"So it looks like we have an incident where half of the witnesses were possibly on heroin or other drugs", Zeta says, without a shred of evidence to support it.

Yes, they were possibly on heroin. I posted a link and quoted it twice. That doesn't help support your beliefs so you will ignore it, deny it and insult anyone that gets in your way. I really haven't found your low yet but you are getting there.

Responding to you IS my low. I don't plan on sinking to it again.

And let's make your BS nice and clear, you have absolutely no evidence that any serviceman involved in this incident was on heroin. Isn't that correct?

He doesn't need evidence. You have none and yet that is no restriction to you spouting your nonsense. Add hypocrite to delusional. Why must everyone else satisfy the burden of proof except you? At least he had a study supporting it with self admitted drug users. You have bright lights and a child's deductive reasoning skills.