It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Hoosierdaddy71
Do you blame nestle' for letting the permit expire, or the state inspectors that failed to do their job for 27 years?
originally posted by: Hoosierdaddy71
Do you blame nestle' for letting the permit expire, or the state inspectors that failed to do their job for 27 years?
originally posted by: Sunwolf
What California is ultimately going to have to do is increase water storage,plain and simple.
originally posted by: Rocker2013
originally posted by: Sunwolf
What California is ultimately going to have to do is increase water storage,plain and simple.
They had water storage, and then they used it all.
People are ignoring the water table here. Below ground there is a wealth of water which could be used to sustain comfortable life during any dry period, but in California there has been such a free for all on all water sources that this water table has dropped to a level which would require months of never ending rain fall for it to be restored.
This is what wells are for, to dig down to find the water table. They have been digging these wells lower and lower in various parts of the state, meaning that the water table has dropped lower and lower, and when it rains it's now going to be sinking into that sponge rather than running off to be used.
If you imagine flood conditions, it's the reverse of that. In a flood the water has nowhere to go - usually because the water table is already up to the maximum, and the excess water then runs off in floods or sits on the surface. When the water table has been entirely tapped and dropped to catastrophic levels, any rainfall is going to instantly sink to replenish what should be below ground anyway. As there is little there in most of the state (thanks to the wells) it's going to take years, if not decades, to bring that level back up to a sustainable point.
California is royally f-ed, and it's going to be royally f-ed for years to come. They needed to halt the majority of well use ten years ago and they didn't. They needed to stop companies from tapping into run-off and wells ten years ago, and they didn't.
If people in California think their government has a plan they are dramatically mistaken. This is a natural disaster, caused by the irresponsibility of their elected officials and their ignorance and greed. They have systematically abused the single most important resource for the state and seemingly done nothing to mitigate this coming disaster. To make it even more interesting, they are now attempting to blame the public for this by demanding people use less, when in reality the usage by the average citizen has absolutely no effect on the amount of water available.
They are placing all responsibility on the public for this, and refusing to even talk about anything that would blame their mismanagement.
originally posted by: Irishhaf
Wonder how much of that water used by nestle stays stateside and how much is exported.
The state is very much at fault, but nestle is rapidly climbing my list of companies I can't stand..
Sounds like they are using the same practices in California they have been using on the great Lakes.
originally posted by: Serdgiam
Water is the new gold.
The past few decades have seen a large surge in purchases of water rights by powerful organizations, all over the world.
If you have water rights, watch them very carefully. This is something that goes far beyond Cali. Whether or not there is a drought is irrelevant when one has the power to create the scarcity.
America's oil and gas rush is depleting water supplies in the driest and most drought-prone areas of the country, from Texas to California, new research has found. Of the nearly 40,000 oil and gas wells drilled since 2011, three-quarters were located in areas where water is scarce, and 55% were in areas experiencing drought, the report by the Ceres investor network found. Fracking those wells used 97bn gallons of water, raising new concerns about unforeseen costs of America's energy rush. "Hydraulic fracturing is increasing competitive pressures for water in some of the country's most water-stressed and drought-ridden regions," said Mindy Lubber, president of the Ceres green investors' network.
originally posted by: AntigravityField
I suspect that the bulk of the water that Nestle bottles is going to human or pet consumption. I have no problem with that during a drought. Nestle should just get up to date on their water permit, that's all.