It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: InverseLookingGlass
Have you heard the term immune disregulation?
You are not alone. It's a technical term for when your immune system attacks native and benign external proteins.
read more here
There has been a massive increase of childhood immune disregulation. The list is quite long and many of the newer ones have not even been fully articulated in medical literature. They are coming too fast for even this corrupt army of psuedo-scientists.
Here are some examples of immune disregulation. Each one is on the increase in children. Raise your hand when a child you know has one of the following:
1. milk, peanut, egg allergy.
2. Asthma
3. Type 1, 1.5 and 2 diabetes
4. Autism
5. IBS
6. Psoriasis
What are some of the weird syndromes?
1. I brought this last year.
2. Some other obscure medical terms not easily searchable
Let me get straight to the point here.
Vaccines should carry an immune disregulation "score" for the damage it can do.
read more here
Crazy? Bear me out here. Vaccines trigger the immune system in an unnatural way. The vaccine immune triggering mechanisms employing aluminum adjuvants are not as selective as our native immune system. Many, not all vaccines combine adjuvants and extraneous proteins from peanut, chicken embryo, cow embryo and this might shock you, human DNA pieces. The big picture is the one they don't want you to see. Nobody is rushing to do a study on PANS syndrome. Why?
There are known measures of immune disregulation and they should be prioritized and formalized in the licensing now. If medical science was following Nuremberg code and the Precautionary principle, it would be all over these trends.
read more here
The inaction is the injustice.
originally posted by: rickymouse
The constant bombardment of our young with vaccines is taking it's toll. You can't keep activating the immune system and not have it fight a real threat. If your immune system has nothing to fight, it will fight you. The immune response from these vaccines is real. The problem is that it is stimulated these immune chemicals can cause inflammation. They need to just give the basic vaccine. I don't know of any country in the world that gives as many vaccines as they do in the USA. They are waiting to see the problems associated with over vaccination. They know that over vaccination can cause problems.
It's not any individual vaccine, it is a combination of them. It is almost like our government is letting them use us as guinny pigs. The vaccines the rich get are not always the same as the ones we get either. There is a difference. Are these people like the president getting the same vaccines as we do? I know that those on Wall Street were getting special vaccines.
When Classen discusses proof of a supposed link between vaccines and diabetes in his review, he exclusively cites his own studies in the document.
Citing your own "research" to back up your own papers is a no-no.
You're citing Classen. Bad.
Not a very good "study" for the following reasons.
Classen owns an anti-vaccine organization and has published a range of papers on a supposed link between vaccines and immune related disorders. He also owns patents on “the act of reading the published scientific literature and using it to create vaccination schedules that minimize immune disorders” which can be licensed by others.
A child's immune system "is constantly bombarded" throughout every normal day with airborne pathogens, getting cuts and scratches, ingesting food (and in some cases non-food items).
originally posted by: and14263
a reply to: Pardon?
Aside from the rest of what you said, this:
When Classen discusses proof of a supposed link between vaccines and diabetes in his review, he exclusively cites his own studies in the document.
Citing your own "research" to back up your own papers is a no-no.
Is exactly why science is locked in a paradigm and will never change. Old values are reinforced by old studies and new research only comes to the forefront when those funding allow it to.
On the face of it a valid criticism, in reality - just another way the system fails and keeps the truth hidden.
**************************************************************
Brilliant OP
Don't let the easily led vaxxers bring you down!
originally posted by: InverseLookingGlass
a reply to: Pardon?
A child's immune system "is constantly bombarded" throughout every normal day with airborne pathogens, getting cuts and scratches, ingesting food (and in some cases non-food items).
You've made my point. The native immune system is attacked all day everyday. But it doesn't atack it's own proteins. The native immune response is balanced and highly selective. Vaccines should all be judged on BOTH seroconversion and selectivity. This is the way the native immune system works. Vaccines are dangerous hacks of a child's developing system. Read the last paper.
originally posted by: InverseLookingGlass
a reply to: Pardon?
You're citing Classen. Bad.
Not a very good "study" for the following reasons.
Classen owns an anti-vaccine organization and has published a range of papers on a supposed link between vaccines and immune related disorders. He also owns patents on “the act of reading the published scientific literature and using it to create vaccination schedules that minimize immune disorders” which can be licensed by others.
Should we just wait for Pharma to come clean? Or maybe we should wait for a university in the US or UK to charter a major study on immune disregulation and the lack of selectivity of adjuvants? No. That would be silly and you know it. Pharma's racket is being exposed. Manipulate all the journals, the university grants, spike the peer review, massive regulatory capture. Of course the breakthroughs are going to come from the fringe of this corrupt control structure.
originally posted by: rickymouse
a reply to: Pardon?
Back when there was a shortage of flu vaccines the people in some major banking firm were getting vaccines while nobody else was. They explained it on the news. They had ordered vaccines with a different and better adjuvant. Their vaccines were much more expensive.
That information should be on the net. It isn't a secret at all nor is it a conspiracy. It is just the way it is. Money talks, BS walks.
originally posted by: rickymouse
a reply to: GetHyped
www.foxnews.com...
www.businessweek.com...
But neither of these articles explain the different formulation I was talking about. I am wondering if this incident is related to the other article I read about the vaccines with the other adjuvant in them. Those other vaccines I am talking about are not payed for at all by our government. Evidently these ones at sacks and citi were paid for by our government.
I know, these also are not legit sources like ATS is.