It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: greencmp
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: greencmp
a reply to: Annee
You do understand that public schools are funded by taxpayers right?
Absolutely!
So, if a citizen has already paid for a service, how does fining them for not utilizing it completely make any sense at all?
originally posted by: jude11
It's called enrollment but it's actually just turning the kids over. Try NOT enrolling. It's not optional.
Comparing Govt. run schools with a private job doesn't even make sense.
Now, if I worked for the Govt. and someone didn't show up so that I couldn't do my job that day what happens?
originally posted by: Annee
a reply to: redhorse
You can claim whatever you want.
I'm talking about America's school system - - - which sounds exactly the same.
You keep your child out of school - - - you are stealing from the government.
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: jude11
It's called enrollment but it's actually just turning the kids over. Try NOT enrolling. It's not optional.
Comparing Govt. run schools with a private job doesn't even make sense.
Now, if I worked for the Govt. and someone didn't show up so that I couldn't do my job that day what happens?
It was hypothetical - - - don't try to twist it.
In America - - - children in most areas (some are questionable) are required to go to school. Doesn't have to be government, can be private, or home schooled. Exceptions are made for religious beliefs.
But, if your child is enrolled in public school - - - taking them out is stealing from the government.
We have already paid taxes that pay for the schools. Children are not wards of the state. Only a socialist/Communist believe that the state knows better than the parent, or actually better than anyone individual.
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: Bilk22
That is truly an unbelievable response.
originally posted by: Annee
Here we go again.
Schools work on a very tight budget. They are paid only if student is in attendance.
You take your kid out of school - - you are stealing from the government.
You don't want your kid in a government school - - then pay for a private one.
Socialism is a wonderful thing.
This is where the US is heading.
The Real World is unbelievable?
What? Schools function on a "Promise and a Prayer"?
originally posted by: Bilk22
originally posted by: Annee
You enroll your child in public/government school - - - your child is the marker for payment. No Marker - No Payment.
I'm not sure if I've ever read a more demented phrase on ATS. ~shakes head in disbelief
originally posted by: Bilk22
originally posted by: Annee
You enroll your child in public/government school - - - your child is the marker for payment. No Marker - No Payment.
I'm not sure if I've ever read a more demented phrase on ATS. ~shakes head in disbelief
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: Bilk22
originally posted by: Annee
You enroll your child in public/government school - - - your child is the marker for payment. No Marker - No Payment.
I'm not sure if I've ever read a more demented phrase on ATS. ~shakes head in disbelief
Whatever.
It is what it is.
I'm not going to argue about it.
originally posted by: redhorse
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: Bilk22
originally posted by: Annee
You enroll your child in public/government school - - - your child is the marker for payment. No Marker - No Payment.
I'm not sure if I've ever read a more demented phrase on ATS. ~shakes head in disbelief
Whatever.
It is what it is.
I'm not going to argue about it.
I can only hope that you have never been in the business of educating children. "A marker". Good grief. That is sick.
No. You're correct on that. It is unfortunately factual. What's troubling is your blithe attitude toward those facts. Actually what's even more troubling is your support of the system regarding those facts.
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: jude11
Well, you seem very loyal and grateful to your Govt. so nothing can be said to change anything here.
Why?
Because I presented factual information?
originally posted by: Bilk22
No. You're correct on that. It is unfortunately factual. What's troubling is your blithe attitude toward those facts. Actually what's even more troubling is your support of the system regarding those facts.
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: jude11
Well, you seem very loyal and grateful to your Govt. so nothing can be said to change anything here.
Why?
Because I presented factual information?
How come a scene from Metropolis just went flashing thru my head?
Why don't you share that with us?
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: Bilk22
No. You're correct on that. It is unfortunately factual. What's troubling is your blithe attitude toward those facts. Actually what's even more troubling is your support of the system regarding those facts.
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: jude11
Well, you seem very loyal and grateful to your Govt. so nothing can be said to change anything here.
Why?
Because I presented factual information?
How come a scene from Metropolis just went flashing thru my head?
It is your interpretation that my attitude is blithe.
I never said one way or the other how I felt about it.
originally posted by: kaylaluv
Annee is correct. You pay federal and state taxes. The federal and state government takes that money and appropriates it to fund schools. They make the decision on who gets the funding. Part of the schools' funding is based on how many students are attending - doesn't that make some sort of sense? More students = more funding to take care of their education. Less students = less funding is needed. When students don't show up to school - it means they aren't getting educated for those days they are out - thus the school doesn't get the funding for those kids.
That IS simply the way it works. Don't like it? Talk to your congressmen/women about having school funding not being based on attendance. Good luck with that. Your other option is private school or home school.
originally posted by: Bilk22
Why don't you share that with us?
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: Bilk22
No. You're correct on that. It is unfortunately factual. What's troubling is your blithe attitude toward those facts. Actually what's even more troubling is your support of the system regarding those facts.
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: jude11
Well, you seem very loyal and grateful to your Govt. so nothing can be said to change anything here.
Why?
Because I presented factual information?
How come a scene from Metropolis just went flashing thru my head?
It is your interpretation that my attitude is blithe.
I never said one way or the other how I felt about it.