It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: mc_squared
a reply to: Sremmos80
Lol just posted that same cartoon here.
Amazing how this really simple point is so lost on some people.
originally posted by: yorkshirelad
a reply to: chiefsmom
Sorry but no amount of "I'm a really nice person who cares about the environment but thinks all environmental science is bunkum" can possible be sincere.
Let me guess , you live in the US. If so then like a lot of US folks you forget that you are merely a small fraction of the whole world. There are considerably more non US climate scientists that US ones. The funding of science outside the US is different and thus the old "because they are funded by XYZ they are lying" and thus dismissed is naive BS.
Melting glaciers - natural
Melting icecaps - natural
Ocean acidification - natural
Odd hot weather - natural
Odd cold weather - natural
Odd dry weather - natural
Odd wet weather - natural
Pole migration of flora -natural
Pole migration of fauna - natural
all "natural" in the last 50 years, yeah right!
Am I annoyed by this, too damn right. why the need to continue with this line of argument? The people who can implement change do not want to you have won. Now live with the above list and feel goooooood!.
originally posted by: chiefsmom
a reply to: BeefNoMeat
I believe the earth itself causes most of the changes.
For instance: the changing of the jet stream( I think that is the one I'm looking for, but it will do.)
How would pollution change that, say as easily, as an earthquake, and the moving of a plate? How do we know that even a millimeter movement, doesn't have massive effects on currents and the like?
Basically, that we do not know how little shifts and changes occurring naturally on earth, can have large scale effects on the weather.
(and please forgive my incorrect by)
originally posted by: Metallicus
Just because we don't agree about the reason to clean up pollution doesn't mean we shouldn't clean it up. Who cares about 'global warming' if we all agree that pollution is bad? My only caveat is that the corporations that make the mess be financially responsible for cleaning it up...not us little people.
originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: grandmakdw
Um what can the people in the US do about China??
How does that make any sense...
No one gives them a free pass, it is well known the damage they do but outside of the Chinese doing something about it l, not much can be done
originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: Justoneman
Al gore and the Clintons don't speak for everyone.
This stance that since other countries do bad that america shouldn't do anything is laughable at best.
Or that some how the crowd that is for the idea of climate change being more then natural just some how give those countries a pass is willfully ignorant.
originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: Justoneman
Has biil denied any debate?
Who is not allowing it happen?