It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
From your link, UnBreakable said:
originally posted by: jude11
I actually hope UnBreakable is wrong on this one.
Luckily, I'm usually wrong...
originally posted by: Arbitrageur
From your link, UnBreakable said:
originally posted by: jude11
I actually hope UnBreakable is wrong on this one.
Luckily, I'm usually wrong...
Science does have some predictive tools. They can tell when a volcano eruption is imminent.
For Earthquakes we can determine the amount of plate movement, and calculate the amount of stress built up over time, and estimate the approximate magnitude potential based on that built up stress. But even predicting the date of an Earthquake within a decade isn't possible yet. The reason why is understandable, there are too many nuanced variables.
To be sure the big one will happen sometime, but if we have a million people predict it on a million different days, and it happens on one of those days, the prediction wasn't just "lucky", it was inevitable. It had to happen on one of those million days. So I wouldn't even get excited if an earthquake happened on the day someone said it would. Statistically that's bound to happen even if their predictive skills are exactly zero. Now if a person or a team of scientists make a chain of accurate predictions that are statistically unlikely, then we might have something to talk about.
But in this thread....nothing.
Field said his team concluded that the previous forecast over-predicted the rate of “moderate-sized” earthquakes like the 6.7 Northridge temblor of 1994 “because we weren’t linking faults up.” That’s also why the previous forecast under-predicted the rate of quakes 8.0 and larger.
“We are fortunate that seismic activity in California has been relatively low over the past century. But we know that tectonic forces are continually tightening the springs of the San Andreas fault system, making big quakes inevitable,” Tom Jordan, director of the Southern California Earthquake Center and a co-author of the study, said in a statement.
originally posted by: jude11
2. I believe his time prediction was 4:17...Only a few minutes off so far.
originally posted by: Greven
His prediction was at 4:17 Pacific time - and of a much larger quake.
Consider this: that would fall under a foreshock if a significantly (magnitude 5.8+) greater quake were to happen soon.
Not saying UnBreakable is right, but it might be a good idea to exercise some caution.
Are we going to see the big one today? Time will tell.