It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Bone75
originally posted by: boymonkey74
a reply to: WilsonWilson
Treatment? they aren't ill.
Then neither is someone who is sexually attracted to children. Should we ban treatment for them as well?
originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: windword
In my view, this move on President Obama's part, is absolutely vital.
I am straight, and I am Christian, but I know cruelty and torture when I see them, and that is the very definition of some of the methods I have heard of, which are being used to coerce alterations in sexual preference in young men and women. This despite the FACT that there is no scientific evidence what so ever, which supports the idea that these therapies work, AND even worse, the fact that even if they did, the methodology used to achieve the result is ENTIRELY amoral in and of itself!
The very existence of these therapies is an indictment against the human race. The people who organise and operate these retreats and therapeutic sessions, ought to be ashamed of their hubris. The idea that many of these organisations are supposed to be faith based, frankly makes me sick to my stomach, as all such hypocrisy does. I hope that Obama's proposal is endorsed and upheld in this instance.
originally posted by: cavtrooper7
I agree.
WHY can't individuals be as they wish so long as they don't violate laws?
WHY can't those who are gay figure out how to get along with the many who aren't.
They are NOT their enemy, and get out of hostility to EVERYONE who is percieved as wrong to THEM.
DON'T change the OTHER SIDE'S institutions MAKE your own.
originally posted by: Bone75
I'm in agreement with Wilson on this one. I'm all for banning forced treatment, but it should still be available to those who want it. An all out ban across the board goes too far.
originally posted by: Bone75
originally posted by: boymonkey74
a reply to: WilsonWilson
Treatment? they aren't ill.
Then neither is someone who is sexually attracted to children. Should we ban treatment for them as well?
originally posted by: WilsonWilson
You cant prevent people from getting treatment if they want it!
make it illegal for minors to be forced by parents to have the treatments, but if an adult wants to, and makes the choice to seek this kind of treatment it should be open to them!
originally posted by: olaru12
Pedophilia is certainly a mental illness!
originally posted by: Quetzalcoatl14
False equivalency.
Simply being attracted to the same sex is not the same thing as being attracted to children.
originally posted by: Bone75
originally posted by: Quetzalcoatl14
False equivalency.
How so?
Simply being attracted to the same sex is not the same thing as being attracted to children.
And what do you mean "simply"? How is one any more simple or complicated than the other?
originally posted by: Quetzalcoatl14
Homosexuality is not defined as a mental illness
Then so is homosexuality. I honestly just don't understand why one is a "sexual orientation" and the other is a mental illness.
Parents force their children to attend these "conversion therapy" camps. That's where people are forced.
originally posted by: beezzer
Can someone show me a state or locality where this conversion therapy is mandatory and forced onto people? I don't think it should be forced onto anyone, but I'm having problems finding where it is forced.
I'm confused.