It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: AllIsOne
As CYBERCOM commander General Keith Alexander has stated the NSA does not have the capability to monitor domestic email communications. You can sleep well tonight!
originally posted by: tadaman
a reply to: ForteanOrg
Hey, I understand what you are saying. I actually agree.
What I meant was, I wont throw on a uniform and don work tools /materials for free unless I love you. If I am working full shifts PRODUCING money for you....GIVE ME SOME!!
originally posted by: ForteanOrg
So, if you tell - you either only have useless disinformation to share (like Greg's - his book was even reviewed by the NSA) or you will tell dangerous stuff - in which case you won't make any money and may consider yourself lucky to be alive.
originally posted by: Bedlam
That said, they do a DANDY job monitoring stuff you send from little circumscribed environments where they're actually interested in what you're sending and have some motivation to put in the effort. So emails sent from, say, some military bases, or through cell towers in reach of the base could be monitored with less effort. Or places like that.
I've seen a demo years ago (posted here somewhere before all the recent NSA hooha, I think) where they produced some of my old emails like little rabbits out of hats.
originally posted by: Bedlam
Or, there's other alternatives that aren't a false dichotomy. For all you know, Snowden is a talented actor, releasing things that they wanted him to release, and playing the man without a country bit.
originally posted by: aethertek
originally posted by: greghansen
a reply to: Indigo5
Sorry - cannot say - not that I don't know, I just cannot say.
So what good are you for than?
Seems to me that your "tell all" is merely an attempt to profit from the very people you have done a disservice to.
K~
originally posted by: Bedlam
originally posted by: ForteanOrg
So, if you tell - you either only have useless disinformation to share (like Greg's - his book was even reviewed by the NSA) or you will tell dangerous stuff - in which case you won't make any money and may consider yourself lucky to be alive.
Or, there's other alternatives that aren't a false dichotomy. For all you know, Snowden is a talented actor, releasing things that they wanted him to release, and playing the man without a country bit.
originally posted by: Bedlam
For all you know, Snowden is a talented actor, releasing things that they wanted him to release, and playing the man without a country bit.
originally posted by: greghansen
a reply to: BatheInTheFountain
The answer to your question is "both." There is a great series of videos called "Great Decisions", one of which is called "Privacy in the Digital Era." I gave a lecture on that recently and one point I made is that we give away personal information all the time via Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, etc. We are complacent.
On the other hand, as I point out in my book, Intelligence Agencies are loathe to share information. Just look at the Boston Marathon bombers. We were warned by the Russians but the FBI didn't see fit to notify the NSA who could have legally (via FISA) done surveillance on the bombers.
There is no shortage of arrogance in the IC.