It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
What about Neutering and Spaying for a start?
originally posted by: ketsuko
The first two are California - Riverside and Stockton, and both are deeply blue areas in an impoverished state that has no idea what "fiscal responsibility" means.
originally posted by: Dimithae
Came across this and once again it does seem that the poor are being picked on. So why is it put in this forum? Well it seems they are taking people's pets and refusing to give them back,putting them down,and/or charging people with little financial means huge amounts to get their pets back. It is almost like blackmail. I understand that for the safety of all,animals need to have their vaccinations,and need to be kept in their own yard. But who hasn't had a dog wander off their property once in a blue moon? I know our dog who was normally a very good dog,would do it when the females in the neighborhood went into season every year. What about low cost vet care according to their ability to pay? There must be other ways than this. And then when you see that those in the gated communities aren't touched....well how nice.
money.cnn.com...
originally posted by: Dimithae
a reply to: Iwinder
What about Neutering and Spaying for a start?
Thats what I was getting at about the low cost Vet care. Pay as you can afford,sliding scale type of thing. You could only access it if you used it to get your animal fixed. Once fixed then you could use it as needed,shots,emergency care,check ups etc.
originally posted by: smirkley
How many people abandon their dogs during the mass exodus from Detroit a few years ago? Countless numbers.
I would not want to walk around those abandon neighborhoods after dark. There are packs of feral dogs there now. And animal control is nonexistant.
Poor people shouldnt own dogs they cant afford. And if animal control picks them up of course the owners should face large charges to get them back. Otherwise the out of control animal problems multiply.
I don't have a bit of problem with it.
originally posted by: smirkley
a reply to: Anyafaj
And you are doing right by your pup. But you know there are lots of folks that just keep their dogs on chains outside. And the bigger the dog the bigger the responsibility. Maybe I should have not addressed it the way I did. I am certain that there are irresponsible animal owners in all demographics.
As you can tell I am a huge dog lover. And I voice my opinions on how some dogs are treated with no issue or hesitation. It makes me want to cry everytime I see one of these wonderful creatures mistreated or in pain of any kind.
And that is one cute pup btw. Looks like lots of personality in those eyes.
originally posted by: smirkley
a reply to: Anyafaj
See, now your making me smile talking about the play dates. It goes against everything my wife thinks I am. A grumpy bastard lol.
But yes there are some pretty cold people out there. They have no idea the suffering they create on the animals just because they dont want to see them around. Chicken bones. Anti freeze. They should be made to swallow that stuff if caught Leaving it out to harm a dog.