It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: DonVoigt
a reply to: Mandroid7
My experience with unions was horrible to.they want to take money out of your paycheck without providing any real benefit.
originally posted by: olaru12
originally posted by: DonVoigt
a reply to: Mandroid7
My experience with unions was horrible to.they want to take money out of your paycheck without providing any real benefit.
Without my union, I would have no health insurance, retirement, or recourse if hurt on the job, we have our own credit union with better low interest loans than any bank,grant money for further education, and free movie tickets.
I willingly pay my union dues for that type of security. Enjoy your weekend...you wouldn't have it but for unions.
www.u-s-history.com...
Proud member of SAG/AFTRA and IATSE
originally posted by: BatheInTheFountain
If Illegal Immigration is a POSITIVE for our economy, then why have a border policy at all?
Why have a minimum wage? Why not just keep it going if it's so good for us? Why not just let everyone in and tell everyone that jobs are open to the lowest bidder?
originally posted by: Grimpachi
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
Oh...and the other linked article further explains it with some more references....
linked article
I think there is still time for you to go back and add all these links you are throwing out now to your OP.
As for this other article from the examiner is it also about a 2013 letter.
You are dangerously close to gish galloping.
SUITS BY AND AGAINST LABOR ORGANIZATIONS
Sec. 301. [§ 185.] (a) [Venue, amount, and citizenship] Suits for violation of contracts between an employer and a labor organization representing employees in an industry affecting commerce as defined in this Act [chapter], or between any such labor organization, may be brought in any district court of the United States having jurisdiction of the parties, without respect to the amount in controversy or without regard to the citizenship of the parties.
National Labor Relations Act
Congress enacted the National Labor Relations Act ("NLRA") in 1935
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
[sic]...Just what we need....illegal immigrants getting involved in union activism to take away jobs from actual citizens. I am so sick of this garbage and it just keeps getting piled on...[sic]
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
It's ridiculous....it is telling people to illegally come to the US, unionize and force an employer to make you legally able to work here. It is putting the onus on the employer and relieving the immigrant of any obligation to become legal BEFORE getting a job.
U.S. signed agreement with Mexico to teach illegal and legal immigrants to unionize....SERIOUSLY?
originally posted by: Mandroid7
a reply to: DonVoigt
I think the specialized trades will not survive without fluent english speaking workers. They can't comprehend the more detailed processes and end up being more trouble than they are worth.
As a contractor, I had quite a few issues with them.
One example was from a couple of years ago, I built a contemporary attorney's office.
The drywall contractor I subbed used Mexicans whom didn't speak english. They finished the job fast, but drove my scissor lift through a wall, smashed up the plumbing, ripped off a door opener, and left a big bottle of piss in the corner of the room.
This was in a high end area and was a complete embarrassment.
Their communication boundaries make them unemployable for anything other than cleaning, imo.
Not much coming out of Washington these days to benefit citizens. So when they cook up this crap, you gotta ask why?
My guess is Obama's adoptive voters program. Streamlining them into areas to vote, and the others claiming he is a saint, so they may go vote on their own.