42 ADMITTED False Flag Attacks

For those whom find it difficult to accept that False Flags have been used throughout history for nefarious purposes, please read this list of confirmed events:

42 ADMITTED False Flag Attacks

Also, take note of the quotes at the end of the article:

Leaders throughout history have acknowledged the danger of false flags:

“A history of false flag attacks used to manipulate the minds of the people! “In individuals, insanity is rare; but in groups, parties, nations, and epochs it is the rule.”
― Friedrich Nietzsche.

“Terrorism is the best political weapon for nothing drives people harder than a fear of sudden death”.
– Adolph Hitler

“Why of course the people don’t want war … But after all it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship … Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country.”
– Hermann Goering, Nazi leader.

“The easiest way to gain control of a population is to carry out acts of terror. [The public] will clamor for such laws if their personal security is threatened.”
– Josef Stalin.

a reply to: Dark Ghost

The most important (admitted to) false flag in world history is the ibe that started WW2 and catapulted Hitler into absolute power.

The burning of the Reichstag.

911 would be another huge one, but by far lesser, as it has gotten many times fewer people killed and caused far less suffering over all. If it fact was.

I have not seen definitive proof either way.

How long till ISIS gets added to the list.

50 year statute?

a reply to: Dark Ghost

#14 sent chills down my spine - that was back in 1962. If anything, those in power are just MORE likely to commit to such atrocities nowadays. Pretty terrifying to be honest.

(10) The British Prime Minister admitted to his defense secretary that he and American president Dwight Eisenhower approved a plan in 1957 to carry out attacks in Syria and blame it on the Syrian government as a way to effect regime change.

Hmmm.

Imagine if they actually admitted to the rest of them that have not yet been proven. History repeats itself and many of these are similarities of what we are seeing int he news right now. Dirty business and we are all getting played, I hate feeling like a pawn.

(21) A Mossad agent admits that, in 1984, Mossad planted a radio transmitter in Gaddaffi’s compound in Tripoli, Libya which broadcast fake terrorist trasmissions recorded by Mossad, in order to frame Gaddaffi as a terrorist supporter. Ronald Reagan bombed Libya immediately thereafter.

And they finished the job in 2011after riots started by al qaeda paved the way for them.

The Gulf Of Tonkin incident was not a false flag attack.

A FF is a 'staged' event, the GOT incident was not staged, the data was originally misinterpreted, and details of the event were ignored later. Yes it was used as one of the many pretexts for military escalation in South Vietnam, but it was not a 'staged' event, and therefore not a false flag.

The amount of people who cite this incident as a false flag attack is indicative of how people in the 'conspiracy' world are more interested in jargon than they are in actual details.

a reply to: Dark Ghost

The problem with all this,that no one is EVER brought up on charges for it. It is illegal to plan and or execute a false flag,but since no one ever pays a high price for it,they just keep on doing it.

originally posted by: seabhac-rua
The Gulf Of Tonkin incident was not a false flag attack.

A FF is a 'staged' event, the GOT incident was not staged, the data was originally misinterpreted, and details of the event were ignored later. Yes it was used as one of the many pretexts for military escalation in South Vietnam, but it was not a 'staged' event, and therefore not a false flag.

The amount of people who cite this incident as a false flag attack is indicative of how people in the 'conspiracy' world are more interested in jargon than they are in actual details.

Many of them are not False Flags, some are just things somebody talked about doing, some are events that happened that they tried to frame somebody else etc. Again people should just stop using the term because it gets tossed around so much it now has no meaning or power. The one thing all false flags have in common is nobody remembers them because they are followed immediatly by a much larger planned event. They are always completely obvious but, nobody bothers with them because the event that follows grabs all the attention. Nobody is really suppose believe for any amount of time.

a reply to: Dark Ghost

And yet majority outside ATS will say

No Way

Sad, very sad what information control does to people

a reply to: MrSpad

Agreed. I see some of them on the list are simply blatant frame jobs and some are even agent provocateur-style stunts pulled. I think the primary thing that shouldn't be missed, semantics aside, is that governments play a bunch of royally jacked up games and it is really flipping stupid to take them at face value in the wake of any major event prior to close circumspection of the situation.
To use an example from parenting, the feds often remind me of my small children... turn your back on them for a moment and CRASH! Run into the room, some item is laying on the floor, broken, with both children staring at it. Ask what happened and part of the time you get "he/she did it" and both kids pointing at each other and sometimes you get "I don't know how this happened" from both kids. Just like with children, the faster the feds blame someone else after an incident, the more likely it is that they are the ones responsible, themselves.

Uh oh

With this right here I do believe you may blow to many people's mind who cling to their dear "Official Stories"

Quite the impressive list of straight up evil going on right here!

It is no wonder they had to figure out some way to demonize conspiray theorists!

These terrorists need to be held accountable for their treason immediately!

Arab Palestinians seem to be a frequent target of false flag operations. All in the name of Zionist occupation of territory.

(6) The British government admits that – between 1946 and 1948 – it bombed 5 ships carrying Jews attempting to flee the Holocaust to seek safety in Palestine, set up a fake group called “Defenders of Arab Palestine”, and then had the psuedo-group falsely claim responsibility for the bombings (and see this, this and this).

(7) Israel admits that in 1954, an Israeli terrorist cell operating in Egypt planted bombs in several buildings, including U.S. diplomatic facilities, then left behind “evidence” implicating the Arabs as the culprits (one of the bombs detonated prematurely, allowing the Egyptians to identify the bombers, and several of the Israelis later confessed) (and see this and this).

(34) Undercover Israeli soldiers admitted in 2005 to throwing stones at other Israeli soldiers so they could blame it on Palestinians, as an excuse to crack down on peaceful protests by the Palestinians.

originally posted by: MrSpad

originally posted by: seabhac-rua
The Gulf Of Tonkin incident was not a false flag attack.

A FF is a 'staged' event, the GOT incident was not staged, the data was originally misinterpreted, and details of the event were ignored later. Yes it was used as one of the many pretexts for military escalation in South Vietnam, but it was not a 'staged' event, and therefore not a false flag.

The amount of people who cite this incident as a false flag attack is indicative of how people in the 'conspiracy' world are more interested in jargon than they are in actual details.

Many of them are not False Flags, some are just things somebody talked about doing, some are events that happened that they tried to frame somebody else etc. Again people should just stop using the term because it gets tossed around so much it now has no meaning or power. The one thing all false flags have in common is nobody remembers them because they are followed immediatly by a much larger planned event. They are always completely obvious but, nobody bothers with them because the event that follows grabs all the attention. Nobody is really suppose believe for any amount of time.

What about when it is the false flag that grabs everyone's attention away from something that goes by unnoticed?

Example: Every time Israel gets international pressure, a plane falls out of the sky. What is obvious is Israel's trouble-making, what is not obvious is what happens to the planes.

Thank you for this post. Desperation from governments and agencies is always good to study.

I must say, many of the last ones really prove how scared "they" are of a few protesters. That they are willing to dress up and act against their own laws is more ironic than anything else on that list.

To me, it shows the game can still be changed.

"They" can still feel scared #less and that warms my heart.

originally posted by: MALBOSIA

Example: Every time Israel gets international pressure, a plane falls out of the sky. What is obvious is Israel's trouble-making, what is not obvious is what happens to the planes.

Are you seriously contenting that Israel is responsible for that recent plane crash?

Edit: I swear to God I'm starting to get sick of ATS and the idiots who frequent this website.

This is why human governments fail, they attack their own people, lie about it and go to war. And the pattern keeps repeating itself because it works. That quote from Goering at the end is telling.

Do you remember how the Dixie Chicks were vilified for not being patriotic for not supporting Bush and his invasion of Iraq, I do. Just like Goering said you denounce those that oppose the war.
Now who was on the right side of history in retrospect.

originally posted by: MrSpad

originally posted by: seabhac-rua
The Gulf Of Tonkin incident was not a false flag attack.

A FF is a 'staged' event, the GOT incident was not staged, the data was originally misinterpreted, and details of the event were ignored later. Yes it was used as one of the many pretexts for military escalation in South Vietnam, but it was not a 'staged' event, and therefore not a false flag.

The amount of people who cite this incident as a false flag attack is indicative of how people in the 'conspiracy' world are more interested in jargon than they are in actual details.

Many of them are not False Flags, some are just things somebody talked about doing, some are events that happened that they tried to frame somebody else etc. Again people should just stop using the term because it gets tossed around so much it now has no meaning or power.

Here's the definition of false flag from the link which was taken from Wikipedia:

False flag operations are covert operations conducted by governments, corporations, or other organizations, which are designed to appear as if they are being carried out by other entities.

Looks like it fits the criteria to me.