It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Greathouse
a reply to: FlyersFan
That is a completely one sided view. Amnesty international says that both sides committed war crimes in Ukraine. But I'm sure you will ignore that.
both sides have committed war crimes.
I absolutely love it when I can use a pro-Russian propaganda Machine as a source.
“All sides in this conflict have shown disregard for civilian lives and are blatantly violating their international obligations,” said Salil Shetty, Amnesty International’s Secretary General.
RT admits both sides have committed war crimes in the Ukraine
originally posted by: SkepticOverlord
originally posted by: Nikola014
Care to give us ONE evidence that shows Russian troops in Ukraine?
Just as it's absurd to rebut the US involvement in the Ukrainian revolt in Kiev, it's also ridiculous (at this point) repudiate Russian regulars in the Ukraine. Here's a good start: Hard evidence, the regular Russian army invades Ukraine
Russia Today is, OBJECTIVE
I have to agree with the point though, I have yet to see direct evidence of Russian soldiers in Ukraine, seen plenty of corpses but for all I know they're either Kiev forces or Pro-Russia Ukranian fighters.
originally posted by: Greathouse
a reply to: Zcustosmorum
Russia Today is, OBJECTIVE
Wow!!!!
If RT is so objective. Show me three articles critical of Vladimir Putin since its inception.
I have to agree with the point though, I have yet to see direct evidence of Russian soldiers in Ukraine, seen plenty of corpses but for all I know they're either Kiev forces or Pro-Russia Ukranian fighters.
Then you must be getting your information exclusively from RT or another state owned media source.
originally posted by: BornAgainAlien
a reply to: Zcustosmorum
Too late, you`re now damned !
quality of RT's work
May I remind, and from all the evidence I've seen and using historical events, that the aggressor in the Ukraine conflict is America, Russia was forced into a corner and may have reacted, obviously they weren't prepared to let Crimeans die and good on them on that.
I hope a peaceful resolution can be found before things get worse
If RT does quality work then once again show me three articles hell one article critical of Putin since it's inception.
Then explain to me why they reacted in Moldavia and Georgia?
Maybe you should carry the message that. Vladimir Putin should respond to economic sanctions by with drawling aggression.
I don't care whther 1 or a hundred are critical of Putin, it's a solid media channel on the stories they cover.
again, don't care, I am commenting on the situation in Ukraine and how it stands now.
Maybe you should reserve your advice for someone else, I carry no message, I merely call it like I see it
You haven't called anything you keep repeating Don't care .
originally posted by: Greathouse
a reply to: Zcustosmorum
Nope I heard everything you said you failed to provide any evidence. I ask you two simple questions both of your replies were "Don't care. "
Now let me carry this a little farther. The following is a quote from your second post on this page.
" May I remind, and from all the evidence I've seen and using historical events,
That is where you fail. Because obviously you've only chosen to study one small portion of historical events. Moldavia, and Georgia also have a significant part in what Vladimir Putin is doing.
All three of the events are eerily similar to the same events that led towards World War II.
originally posted by: Greathouse
a reply to: Zcustosmorum
Who's the biggest threat to world peace?
Since you're not real big into history. At the moment it is definitely Vladimir Putin.
originally posted by: Greathouse
a reply to: Zcustosmorum
Who's the biggest threat to world peace?
Since you're not real big into history. At the moment it is definitely Vladimir Putin.
Just as the Afghan's didn't want Russia there, Ukraine feels the same way.
So I guess it could be looked that way.