It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: sayzaar
Microsoft don't do free. Their operating systems and products in general are expensive. Mr Gates did not become one of the richest men on earth by 'giving things for free'.
Something very insidious is going on here, my 'smell a rat' meter is off the charts. Just what will windows 10 do for microsoft and the NSA,NWO etc that we will not know about ? They seem pretty desparate to ensure that everyone has it. Microsoft usually sue people to death for pirated copies of their software, so why would this even extend to pirated copies of windows ?
Tread carefully all those that seem so keen to upgrade !!
It appears that many Windows app developers have in their apps a line of code that checks for the Windows version the user is running, and that code uses a “Windows 9” shortcut to detect whether the computer is on Windows 95 or Windows 98. Apparently, those developers never imagined that Microsoft could release a different Windows 9 version in the future, and that particular shortcut might cause enough problems for Microsoft to simply skip a beat.
originally posted by: Jukiodone
a reply to: eriktheawful
Decided to use a couple of old laptops as HTPC's running Ubuntu and Kodi a while ago and am generally happy.
Cant work out for the life of me though why the people who make Linux versions of software still use Terminals and Admin prompts to install none "software centre" software or to undertake custom program add ons etc.
If Linux could do away with Terminals there would be no reason to EVER buy or use MS again- but as it stands; unless you are prepared to wade through pages of Linux tech posts online and copy/paste stuff that you have no idea what it does; it is pretty inaccessible to 98% of users.
originally posted by: darkbake
What happened to Windows 9?
Yet no explanation seems to come close to matching that of a self-described Microsoft developer who goes by the name cranbourne on the social news site Reddit. The user points the finger at Microsoft's almost 20-year-old releases that helped make the software maker a household name during the rise of the PC:
Microsoft dev here, the internal rumours are that early testing revealed just how many third party products that had code of the form
if(version.StartsWith("Windows 9")) [ /* 95 and 98 */ ] else [
and that this was the pragmatic solution to avoid that.
"Having worked on the Windows compatibility team before, I have no difficulty believing this," wrote user richkzad in response. There are in fact examples of this on publicly available code repositories.
Essentially, many software programs that have been updated to be compatible with each and every Windows upgrade since 1995 may have recycled a version of this code snippet to allow them to work with both Windows 95 and Windows 98. If Microsoft's next OS had been named Windows 9, such software would have seen that the name starts with "Windows 9" and could have confused the new operating system with Win 95 and 98. That could have created compatibility issues and caused the programs to stop working, or it could have led to version-check errors or other unknown problems.
originally posted by: Jukiodone
a reply to: eriktheawful
Decided to use a couple of old laptops as HTPC's running Ubuntu and Kodi a while ago and am generally happy.
originally posted by: LoveSolMoonDeath
a reply to: feldercarb
From Win 7 & 8 for the first year you're right.
blogs.windows.com...
But not for the 15 % of XP and NOT for the pirated ones here. See, one in China build a pc, he puts a Win whatever pirated from web, and get Win 10 free. Here we upgrade, there they get OS free on new PC...
originally posted by: Willtell
a reply to: LoveSolMoonDeath
There going to steal it anyway!
This is just a preemption
The great thing about windows 10 is:
THE DESTRUCTION OF INTERNET EXPLORER
Hallalullia!