It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Char-Lee
Don't think the user was a scientist but it is an acceptable use of the word.
originally posted by: Bedlam
originally posted by: Char-Lee
Don't think the user was a scientist but it is an acceptable use of the word.
Only if you're not using it in a scientific context. A theory in science is a totally different thing than a random conjecture.
Just because the word's got more than one meaning doesn't mean you get to apply it outside of context.
You probably don't use "work" the way I would in that context, either.
originally posted by: Char-Lee
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: ChesterJohn
a reply to: AgentSmith
your only presenting another theory that has not been proven by fact.
so it has about as much support as the Bibles version of creation.
Actually, you are presenting a hypothesis not a theory, and the reasoning behind planetary motions isn't based on just Scientific Theory. It's based in Scientific Laws. Have you not heard of Kepler's Laws of Planetary Motion?
Well actually the word can be used many ways. List...
Full Definition of THEORY
www.merriam-webster.com...
b : an unproved assumption : conjecture