It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: GENERAL EYES
a reply to: DjembeJedi
No need to really market a product that sells itself.
We'll get to that part later.
Just curious, are there any videos showing a prototype window in place available? Readouts of energy production from a single panel while in use? Something showing how the light diffuses indoors and so forth? These are all important data point when introducing new innovations.
The average investor needs more than just fancy words.
Product "in action" and proof of concept is a better sell for most folks.
Marketers can always fancy the big sell up later.
You gotta run it through the skeptics first.
Hope this one is legit - because this kind of thing is right up my alley.
Looking forward to updates!
originally posted by: Arbitrageur
a reply to: DjembeJedi
The question is, will 1% efficiency be economically viable? I suspect probably not. If they get it to 5% as they say they think they can, maybe.
It's interesting tech so thanks for posting it, but you should really figure out what those icons are for above the area where you write your post, especially the cloud icon which says "insert content from an external source".
originally posted by: Arbitrageur
a reply to: DjembeJedi
Where in the OP did you state that bolded material is from an external source? You didn't. Neoholographic is a worse offender than you because he uses bold for an external source in one part of his post, then uses bold for emphasis of something he wrote in another part of his post, and it becomes difficult or impossible to tell what he's emphasizing and what is from an external source. There is no need to create such confusion when ATS has made tools readily available to avoid it.
Prob not till the price drops ...I see a way to raise the rent ala free electric...maybe? But for home owners it will be a given!
originally posted by: arpgme
Will landlords and building owners be willing to pay for these windows? It doesn't benefit them to buy better windows for tenants to have free electricity. Hopefully these windows do become the common, then we won't have to worry about electric companies and there will be less polution.
Michigan’s TLSC currently has an efficiency of around 1%, but they think 5% should be possible. Non-transparent luminescent concentrators (which bathe the room in colorful light) max out at around 7%.
originally posted by: arpgme
Will landlords and building owners be willing to pay for these windows? It doesn't benefit them to buy better windows for tenants to have free electricity. Hopefully these windows do become the common, then we won't have to worry about electric companies and there will be less polution.
originally posted by: AliensunYou need to rethink those comments. If I can rent you a place that has cheaper utilities than the next place that is a marketing plus. Such windows would help provide a more evenly, yearly curve on the utility costs of HV/AC than standard systems. That would appeal to renters, home and business owners alike.