It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The spine-tingling photograph was posted on Facebook by Australian Kim Davison, but things began to get really spooky when it was revealed that a little girl died in the same spot 100 years ago.
Ms Davison, from Queensland, posted the image, which was taken in 2014, on the 'Toowoomba Ghost Chasers' Facebook page. It appears to show two women and four children swimming.
However Ms Davison and Jessie Lu, the other adult in the photo, are adamant they were with only three children when the photo was taken at Murphy's Hole in Lockyer River, south-east Queensland.
When examining the photo later, they were all shocked to see a fourth face in the background.
'At the time of taking this photo there was nothing between us,' Ms Davison insists.
'I'm holding the little girl and that white head next to me with horns is not human, I can promise you that,' Ms Davison said.
'Its fingers are on my shoulder and on my daughter's arm. They are long skeletal type fingers.'
The story became even spookier when researchers uncovered the story of Doreen O'Sullivan, a 13-year-old girl who drowned in the same creek in 1913.
A Brisbane Courier newspaper clipping from November 22 1913 has a death notice for a little girl who died in that watering hole.
Disturbingly, Ms Davison claims that there had been strange occurrences that day as they swam in the water, which only firms her belief that a spirit was present.
'On this day my daughter had her leg grabbed two times by something in the water.'
'When I went back in for one last dip to cool off I did feel something behind me as I was walking out of water but tried to ignore it.
originally posted by: thedeadtruth
From reading the story. It may be some kind of evil spirit trying to drown people. So maybe the 13 year old was a victim.
originally posted by: 3n19m470
Id love to see your Mohawkian ghost photo! It would also be interesting to know if the picture was taken near where the Mohawk tribe was known to be. Not that one or more could not have travelled and died somewhere near where your future home would be. How scary for your child though... to see an angry face in the window O.O
originally posted by: AshOnMyTomatoes
So no one is going to say "maybe its a splash, or one of the swimmers' feet?" Considering whatever is there is ACTUALLY there by the negative, clearly, and none of them is frightened of it even though some are facing that direction and could see it.
originally posted by: peter vlar
a reply to: Anyafaj
Near Rome, it would have been a member of the Oneida Indian Nation. They were part of the Iroquois Confederacy along with the Mohawks but the Mohawks were further east. Their main town of Caughnewaga also called Osernenon and their later settlement were both near Fonda which is about 45-60 min east of Rome/n40 miles west of Albany. If you were on the Thruway it would be exit 28. Caughnewaga was on a fairly large hill overlooking the Mohawk valley and it is where Saint Kateri Tekawitha was born. It was a rather prominent place until it was destroyed by the French in the late 17th century in retaliation for the martyring of 3 Jesuit missionaries. The Iroquois controlled almost all of what is now NY state as well as parts of Pennsylvania, eastern Ohio and parts of Quebec.
originally posted by: peter vlar
a reply to: Anyafaj
Yes, the whole area through which the Mohawk River flows from its source in Lewis County just East of Syracuse until it empties into the Hudson at Cohoes is called the Mohawk Valley. The river and valley were certainly named after the Mohawk people who were arguably the most important and powerful tribe in the Iroquois Confederacy and who's language was the Official language for all council meetings amongst the 5(or 6 depending on what period of time is being discussed) tribes. And there could very well have been Mohawk Indians in the area of Rome for many different reasons, trade or diplomacy being primary reasons for the Mohawk to be that far west. I was simply trying to point out that it would have been far more likely to have been a member of the OIN than a Mohawk who's territory was farther east and ran from Canada to around Kingston north to south and from Western Montgomery County/Eastern Herkimer county on its Western border to a little past Albany near the current NY/Mass border. Sorry, I grew up 5 Minutes from Caughnewaga and worked French and Indian War digs in the area when doing my anthropology degree so the history of the land in my back yard has been drilled into my head and studied for quite a long time so if I'm coming off as a smarty pants it's unintentional.
ETA- it's pretty cool that your dad took part in such a big event during the decommissioning ceremonies. Losing that base was a huge blow to the area for a lot of people.
originally posted by: kevinp2300
a reply to: Anyafaj
just out of curiosity...what makes her call him "bad man"?