It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
because the title of this thread does not contain any of the annotations you would like it too to justify
originally posted by: Lucid Lunacy
a reply to: Helious
His title said 'Christians', it didn't say all Christians.
His OP further qualifies it by saying "So if you are a fundy christian"..
Sounds to me like you actually agree with the OP with your mention of Westborough as they obviously represent fundamentalists.
originally posted by: Lucid Lunacy
a reply to: Helious
Well as an antitheist I no doubt qualify as an attacker of religion. So we probably come from diametrically opposing positions on whether that is a good or bad thing? That said, I try to attack beliefs and not people, and I also try to be genuine towards what a particular Christian is saying they themselves believe. I try to avoid sweeping generalizations as I a more than cognizant of the fact there are many denominations under most religions, all with differing interpretations. Some much more damaging than others.
originally posted by: boymonkey74
a reply to: Helious
Religion is there to be mocked and it should be mocked at every opportunity.
Don't like it? tough...
Aloysius the Gaul: Meanwhile in the U.S., Franklin Graham, son of iconic evangelist Billy Graham, is finding a massive response among American Christians with the announcement that ISIS has triggered biblical Armageddon and the triumph of Christianity. One of his Facebook posts on the matter has already received nearly 150,000 likes and over 40,000 shares:
A Most Unsettling Trend: Christians Rejoicing in ISISSo if you are a fundy christian then even the cloud of ISIS has a silver lining - it is heralding the apocalypse - for which you are apparently supposed to be grateful!!
The implications would be comical if not so barbarous - can you imagine fundy christians funding (sic) ISIS to ensure they are not defeated??
To be honest I can imagine it.....nothing about the new theocracy seems too extreme any more!!
originally posted by: undo
originally posted by: Tangerine
originally posted by: undo
originally posted by: Tangerine
Evidence in Revelation? Evidence has to be testable. How is it testable? Don't you really mean unsubstantiated claims?
in the case of ancient texts, the evidence is the texts themselves. for example: evidence suggests that seti the first built the temple at abydos. we know this because of hieroglyphic texts not because we were actually present. it helps if it is further corroborated by people who visited those locations during ancient times, as well, such as plato or his contemporaries, because their accounts tend to be closer to the events discussed and therefore, help to verify.
Let's start by you stating the specific claim made in Revelation that you think is fact. We can go from there.
my claim is a theory based on evidence, such as the abzu of enki, which is the abyss, which is the bottomless pit in revelation. chapter 9 of revelation takes place in iraq. the angels "bound" in the euphrates are bound in the bottomless pit, which apparently, is under the euphrates. however, since ancient sumer, the euphrates has laid down an additional 65miles of silt deposition out into the persian gulf, so originally, the abyss would've been in the persian gulf and is now covered somewhere under that 65 miles of new shoreline, over which the euphrates itself is flowing.
an assyriologist named samuel noah kramer, the first to translate the sumerian cuneiforms, translated one of the cuneiform cylinder seals in which enki raises his e.abzu temple up from the abyss, which he uses interchangeably with abzu (iotw, the abzu is the abyss, which is the bottomless pit).
originally posted by: ladyinwaiting
originally posted by: windword
a reply to: ladyinwaiting
ETA: they are a small segment of Christianity anyway, not really enough of them to do any damage.
This is the same lazy and apologetic attitude many use to dismiss ISIS. Do you realize that?
Oh pleeeze. When the fundies start chopping people's heads off; we can talk.
Until then, Pfffft.
originally posted by: sweets777
a reply to: Aloysius the Gaul
Oh believe me you tell us christians that armegedon has started your rigth..........................we are thrilled
and if you dont know why then i cant tell you................................
ok yes i can ................King Jesus is coming baby !
originally posted by: windword
originally posted by: ladyinwaiting
originally posted by: windword
a reply to: ladyinwaiting
ETA: they are a small segment of Christianity anyway, not really enough of them to do any damage.
This is the same lazy and apologetic attitude many use to dismiss ISIS. Do you realize that?
Oh pleeeze. When the fundies start chopping people's heads off; we can talk.
Until then, Pfffft.
Is there a fundamental difference between ISIS chopping off heads and Christians fundies dropping bombs?
originally posted by: windword
a reply to: Xtrozero
Were you sleeping during the "Shock and Awe" of the "Liberation" of the Iraqi people, that God told George Bush to do?