It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The former assistant director of the library Qusai All Faraj said that the Mosul Public Library was established in 1921, the same year that saw the birth of the modern Iraq. Among its lost collections were manuscripts from the eighteenth century, Syriac books printed in Iraq's first printing house in the nineteenth century, books from the Ottoman era, Iraqi newspapers from the early twentieth century and some old antiques like an astrolabe and sand glass used by ancient Arabs. The library had hosted the personal libraries of more than 100 notable families from Mosul over the last century.
During the US led invasion of Iraq in 2003, the library was looted and destroyed by mobs. However, the people living nearby managed to save most of its collections and rich families bought back the stolen books and they were returned to the library, All Faraj added.
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
The US has burned plenty of books in the past. My guess would be that they did it because history is only for those that win and if you can burn everything about those before you then you can rewrite it in your own way.
originally posted by: kosmicjack
a reply to: lostbook
They are simply doing everything possible - their own shock and awe campaign - to draw the West into their theater of war...
We should seriously stop and ask ourselves "Why?" before we consider giving them exactly what they want.
originally posted by: kosmicjack
a reply to: lostbook
They are simply doing everything possible - their own shock and awe campaign - to draw the West into their theater of war...
We should seriously stop and ask ourselves "Why?" before we consider giving them exactly what they want.
originally posted by: onequestion
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
The US has burned plenty of books in the past. My guess would be that they did it because history is only for those that win and if you can burn everything about those before you then you can rewrite it in your own way.
Substantiate this claim please.
On 5 June 1956 two FDA officials arrived at Orgonon to supervise the destruction of the accumulators. Most of them had been sold at that point and another 50 were with Silvert in New York. Only three were at Orgonon. The FDA agents were not allowed to destroy them, only to supervise the destruction, so Reich's friends and his son, Peter, chopped them up with axes as the agents watched.[135] Once they were destroyed, Reich placed an American flag on top of them.[136]
On 26 June the agents returned to supervise the destruction of the promotional material, including 251 copies of Reich's books.[136] The American Civil Liberties Union issued a press release criticizing the book burning, although coverage of the release was poor, and Reich ended up asking them not to help because he was annoyed that they had failed to criticize the destruction of the accumulators. In England A.S. Neill and the poet Herbert Read signed a letter of protest, but it was never published. On 23 July the remaining accumulators in New York were destroyed by S. A. Collins and Sons, who had built them.[137]
On 23 August six tons of his books, journals and papers were burned in the 25th Street public incinerator in New York, the Gansevoort incinerator. The burned material included copies of several of his books, including The Sexual Revolution, Character Analysis and The Mass Psychology of Fascism. Though these had been published in German before Reich ever discussed orgone, he had added mention of it to the English editions, so they were caught by the injunction.[138] As with the accumulators, the FDA was supposed only to observe the destruction. The psychiatrist Victor Sobey (d. 1995), an associate of Reich's, wrote: "All the expenses and labor had to be provided by the [Orgone Institute] Press. A huge truck with three to help was hired. I felt like people who, when they are to be executed, are made to dig their own graves first and are then shot and thrown in. We carried box after box of the literature."[139] It has been cited as one of the worst examples of censorship in U.S. history.[140]
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
The US has burned plenty of books in the past. My guess would be that they did it because history is only for those that win and if you can burn everything about those before you then you can rewrite it in your own way.
originally posted by: Stormdancer777
originally posted by: kosmicjack
a reply to: lostbook
They are simply doing everything possible - their own shock and awe campaign - to draw the West into their theater of war...
We should seriously stop and ask ourselves "Why?" before we consider giving them exactly what they want.
And when does the world decide they need to be stopped?
How far do we let them go?
How many people do we let them kill before it is necessary to get involved?
originally posted by: yorkshirelad
originally posted by: Vasa Croe
The US has burned plenty of books in the past. My guess would be that they did it because history is only for those that win and if you can burn everything about those before you then you can rewrite it in your own way.
When , where and why did they do that?
Burning books is not something you can hide so claims of "it's all been covered up" does not fly one iota.