It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: tony9802
a reply to: Anyafaj
I have a difficult time understanding.. this means that the children are not communicating to their parents about what is happening or what has happened to them?
The children must be scared, or they are threatened and traumatized to the point of not speaking about it for years on end. Fortunately many of them from this town, Rotherham, are finally coming forward and revealing everything to the primary investigator (Mrs Sarah Champion).; She states in the article that she receives at least 10 children per week, (many of whom are now adults) to speak about their case and history:
originally posted by: FalcoFan
a reply to: tony9802
I'm guessing that the rapists are either threatening to kill them/their family if the kids say anything.
It seems to be the standard operating procedure with these types.
Also,it appears that reporting crimes committed by muslims is considered racism/bigotry in europe.
I guess that unfortunately the europeans are reaping what they sow-by allowing a certain group to basically take over their cities.
Apologists take note.
originally posted by: biggilo
a reply to: Anyafaj
This isn't just one child, it is thousands of children. The perpetrators WERE of Pakistani descent. The rapes were being reported but the authorities refused to do anything about it in case they were branded racist.
Mistreatment of women and children is so rampant in that culture/community that the idiot PC authorities are afraid to act because of the racist slur.
Its a personal pet hate of mine how certain groups when pulled on something or just stopped by a policeman at a standard checkpoint will always seem to pull the race card!.
originally posted by: CharlieSpeirs
a reply to: markosity1973
I guess all the Eastern Europeans and Romanys in the Jay Report are Islam's problem as well...
Or the White Brits who preyed on people in Rotherham between that period of time...
Wake up.
originally posted by: markosity1973
originally posted by: CharlieSpeirs
a reply to: markosity1973
I guess all the Eastern Europeans and Romanys in the Jay Report are Islam's problem as well...
Or the White Brits who preyed on people in Rotherham between that period of time...
Wake up.
You say the above, but what I hear is
"Just because other people rape kids, Muslims should be allowed to as well"
Sickening. Just sickening
Muhammad was married to thirteen women, including eleven at one time. He relegated them to either consecutive days or (according to some accounts) all in one night. He had sex with a 9-year-old girl and married his adopted son's wife (after arranging a quick divorce). On top of that, Muhammad had a multitude of slave girls and concubines with whom he had sex - sometimes on the very days in which they had watched their husbands and fathers die at the hands of his army
originally posted by: CharlieSpeirs
a reply to: markosity1973
I apologise for calling you ignorant...
But I don't appreciate being labelled a rapist sympathiser.
originally posted by: CharlieSpeirs
a reply to: markosity1973
The Muhammad story above is a lie...
& Islam is my religion...
So I will defend it.
I won't defend rapists who hide behind my Faith.
Or any faith!
Critics allege that Aisha was just six years old when she was betrothed to Muhammad, himself in his 50s, and only nine when the marriage was consummated. They base this on a saying attributed to Aisha herself (Sahih Bukhari volume 5, book 58, number 234), and the debate on this issue is further complicated by the fact that some Muslims believe this to be a historically accurate account. Although most Muslims would not consider marrying off their nine-year-old daughters, those who accept this saying argue that since the Qur'an states that marriage is void unless entered into by consenting adults, Aisha must have entered puberty early.