It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: lonesomerimbaud
Also, I have wondered about modern Law. For example, if someone was to murder me how can I or my family be somehow magically consoled by the fact they go to prison for a very long time or are even executed (as some U.S states still practise)?...Judgement is an act of Law and an act of decision making. There are different meanings. Jesus is relating it to sin and punishment. He is telling humanity that we are not qualified to dispense true justice.
originally posted by: dartyparty
a reply to: DISRAELI
Judging what is right and wrong isn't judging?
originally posted by: dartyparty
Maybe you should try reasoning and not simply quoting old books.
originally posted by: DISRAELI
originally posted by: lonesomerimbaud
Also, I have wondered about modern Law. For example, if someone was to murder me how can I or my family be somehow magically consoled by the fact they go to prison for a very long time or are even executed (as some U.S states still practise)?...Judgement is an act of Law and an act of decision making. There are different meanings. Jesus is relating it to sin and punishment. He is telling humanity that we are not qualified to dispense true justice.
Part of the difference between the kind of judging which happens in court and the judgementalism which Jesus was warning about is that the judges are not acting for themselves. They are not, or should not be, pusuing personal vendettas, and they should not be getting their passions involved.
They are simply the agents of society for doing what needs to be done to discourage criminal behaviour.
If nothing at all was done about acts of murder, then acts of murder would become even more common, so doing nothing is not an acceptable option.
Judging in court ought to be nothing more than the discernment of right and wrong and doing something to inhibit the wrong.
originally posted by: lonesomerimbaud
"Judging in court ought to be nothing more than the discernment of right and wrong and doing something to inhibit the wrong."
Yes, that much is obvious.
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: lonesomerimbaud
But in order to know you needed to settle with someone and forgive, you had to discern that some wrong was done. Hence you had to make a judgment.