It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: r0xor
a reply to: Danbones
I don't think he was calling himself Lucifer or the offspring of Lucifer. At least he added 'bright' to it. There's only one morning star, so anyone who calls themselves that one thing is actually claiming to be Lucifer, aka Satan? Is this the logic train that I'm on atm? ..
Jesus is the things that a true morning star comparison would embody such as the bringer of dawn, where as Lucifer clearly is not, and has been described as being physically beautiful only. Followers of Satan will disagree with me, I'm sure. (lol)
Lucifer has associations that many people are unfamiliar with. For instance, the name Lucifer
means light bringer (luce light + ferre bring). There is a cave in the south of France in Saint-
Baume that in Roman times was the center for worship of the goddess Diana Lucifera, the light
bringer or Illuminatrix. Lucifer is also the Latin name of the second planet from the sun; more
commonly called Venus after the goddess of love. Thus the mythic Lucifer that most people
think of as a malevolent male supernatural being therefore has mythic associations with goddess
worship. The conflict of Christianity with earlier goddess worship is therefore likely to be part of
the ideological conflict that the myth of Lucifer and the Angelic Rebellion represents.
www.mirrorhistory.com...
Han Dynasty (206 BC–220 AD) when TLV bronze mirrors started being introduced. These mirrors carry that name because all of them had letters T, L and V engraved into them (letters were related to the astrological and cosmological interests of that time)
Lucifer (/ˈluːsɪfər/ LEW-sif-ər) is the King James Version rendering of the Hebrew word הֵילֵל in Isaiah 14:12. This word, transliterated hêlêl[1] or heylel,[2] occurs only once in the Hebrew Bible[1] and according to the KJV-influenced Strong's Concordance means "shining one, morning star".[2] The word Lucifer is taken from the Latin Vulgate,[3] which translates הֵילֵל as lucifer,[Isa 14:12][4][5] meaning "the morning star, the planet Venus", or, as an adjective, "light-bringing".[6] The Septuagint renders הֵילֵל in Greek as ἑωσφόρος[7][8][9][10][11] (heōsphoros),[12][13][14] a name, literally "bringer of dawn", for the morning star
so, I can show you pesticide resistant cockroaches... please, show me a virgin birth.
originally posted by: Cuervo
a reply to: Danbones
Thematically, it would make more sense but I wouldn't argue it.
Jesus was the antithesis of the brooding savage god of the old testament but he did advocate for many of the same things Satan did. For example, Jesus was meticulous to point out flaws in the accusers just as Satan pushed Jehovah to show his true colors with Job. Satan was also the first to bring enlightenment to Adam and Eve just as Jesus challenged the then-current religious leaders with new enlightenment.
Like I said, I wouldn't argue it but, objectively, Jesus has way more in common with Satan than Jehovah.
originally posted by: arpgme
originally posted by: Cuervo
a reply to: Danbones
Thematically, it would make more sense but I wouldn't argue it.
Jesus was the antithesis of the brooding savage god of the old testament but he did advocate for many of the same things Satan did. For example, Jesus was meticulous to point out flaws in the accusers just as Satan pushed Jehovah to show his true colors with Job. Satan was also the first to bring enlightenment to Adam and Eve just as Jesus challenged the then-current religious leaders with new enlightenment.
Like I said, I wouldn't argue it but, objectively, Jesus has way more in common with Satan than Jehovah.
Satan means adversary/opposer, you can even use satan as a verb in Hebrew meaning "to oppose" (link) and who is the adversary of the false god? Jesus.
Jesus got the followers of yahweh to show their true colors. Jesus told them they have never known The Heavenly Father and that they hated him and wanted to kill him because they hated the True God.
This is why the adversary/satan according to Jesus is yahweh.
originally posted by: Seede
a reply to: Danbones
Lucifer (/ˈluːsɪfər/ LEW-sif-ər) is the King James Version rendering of the Hebrew word הֵילֵל in Isaiah 14:12. This word, transliterated hêlêl[1] or heylel,[2] occurs only once in the Hebrew Bible[1] and according to the KJV-influenced Strong's Concordance means "shining one, morning star".[2] The word Lucifer is taken from the Latin Vulgate,[3] which translates הֵילֵל as lucifer,[Isa 14:12][4][5] meaning "the morning star, the planet Venus", or, as an adjective, "light-bringing".[6] The Septuagint renders הֵילֵל in Greek as ἑωσφόρος[7][8][9][10][11] (heōsphoros),[12][13][14] a name, literally "bringer of dawn", for the morning star
You do have some of that right but some wrong.
In the Hebrew manuscripts there is no such Hebrew word of language as "Lucifer." It is not a translation nor is it a transliteration. It is a name given by the author through his own imagination. The same is the word Heylel. Heylel is not a Hebrew word but is a substituted name made up by the author.
In the Eth Cepher it is translated from the Hebrew as ---
YESHA ' YAHU (Isaiah) 14:12
"How are you fallen from heaven, O Heylel son of the howling morning! how are you cut down to the ground, which did weaken the nations!"
Watch the video -- www.cepher.net...
en.wikipedia.org...
Virgin birth of Jesus;
This article deals with the belief that Jesus of Nazareth was conceived and born of a virgin. For the Roman Catholic doctrine that Mary, his mother, was conceived free from original sin, see Immaculate Conception. For the belief that Mary remained a virgin her entire life, see perpetual virginity of Mary.
The virgin birth of Jesus is the belief that Jesus was conceived in the womb of his mother Mary through the Holy Spirit without the agency of a human father and born while Mary was yet a virgin.[1] The New Testament references are Matthew 1:18-25 and Luke 1:26-38. It is not expressly mentioned elsewhere in the Christian scriptures,[2] and "the modern scholarly consensus is that the doctrine of the virgin birth rests on a very slim historical foundation."[3]
The virgin birth was universally accepted in the Christian church by the 2nd century and, except for some minor sects, was not seriously challenged until the 18th century. It is enshrined in the creeds that most Christians consider normative, such as the Nicene Creed ("incarnate of the Virgin Mary") and the Apostles' Creed ("born of the Virgin Mary"), and is a basic article of belief in the Roman Catholic, Orthodox, and most Protestant churches. Muslims also accept the virgin birth of Jesus.[4]
James gave the translators instructions intended to guarantee that the new version would conform to the ecclesiology and reflect the episcopal structure of the Church of England and its belief in an ordained clergy.[6] The translation was done by 47 scholars, all of whom were members of the Church of England.[7] In common with most other translations of the period, the New Testament was translated from Greek, the Old Testament was translated from Hebrew and Aramaic text, while the Apocrypha were translated from the Greek and Latin. In the Book of Common Prayer (1662), the text of the Authorized Version replaced the text of the Great Bible – for Epistle and Gospel readings – and as such was authorized by Act of Parliament.[8] By the first half of the 18th century, the Authorized Version had become effectively unchallenged as the English translation used in Anglican and Protestant churches. Over the course of the 18th century, the Authorized Version supplanted the Latin Vulgate as the standard version of scripture for English-speaking scholars
www.latinvulgate.com...
How art thou fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, who didst rise in the morning? how art thou fallen to the earth, that didst wound the nations?