Should we just focus on Building 7?

originally posted by: Jchristopher5
I want to get really involved and I am a bit confused where to invest my time and money. Thanks!

Haha, sucker. And now you see the real motivation behind the 'truth' movement and why it's defended so valiantly.

a reply to: Jchristopher5

How do you sleep at night, defending something as indefensible as the events of 9/11?

i don't defend 911. It was used to justify war and I am very anti war.

How about you? Get your head out of the 14 year old rubble.

a reply to: Zcustosmorum

as is the part of thermite being unable to bring down buildings.

You mean, "Nano Thermite", right? Please tell me how you rig a building for collapse with that? You are expert in material sciences, metallurgy, demolition?

originally posted by: samkent
a reply to: Jchristopher5

Your first problem to overcome is almost never talked about on conspiracy sites.

Firefighters:
They were watching the building all day.
They continued measured its leaning all day.
Every single firefighter lost friends that day.
Some firefighters lost brothers or fathers that day.

For your 'smoking gun' to be true it would mean that hundreds of firefighters sold out their families lives for some government payoff.
Not possible !

Your belief is WRONG !

What if the building was rigged to be demolished before that day? Could that be a possibility?

a reply to: samkent

Yea man. Impossible there's anything ugly lurking around top branches of government. Of course Tower 7 just magically collapses because of a cute little fire and no plane bomb. I mean, of course little 'ol fires bring down a building Vegas casino demolition style. How stupid and crazy those truthers are .... Look at them all foaming from the mouth because their brains function proper.

They must be crazy, along with all those firefighters demanding answers because their friends are dead.

If someone can explain how the building was rigged for demo and nobody noticed I'll shout your theory from the rooftops.

Rigging a building is not quiet, and not quick, from what I've seen and read.

a reply to: Krazysh0t

You seemed to be confused. The thread is about building 7, not the towers and NIST did indeed acknowledge the 2.25 seconds of freefall acceleration. And no, wtc 7 was not discussed in the 911 commission report.

originally posted by: samkent

Firefighters:
They were watching the building all day.

You got this part right and some interesting info came out because of it too.



What the heck is a Secret Service person doing in WTC 7 just before the collapse? At 2:54




And the 32 year NYC fire veteran comes forward too. Please go to 3:28 and listen carefully

a reply to: HAZE3

What if the building was rigged to be demolished before that day? Could that be a possibility?

What if.
What if.
If you are going to play that angle you can what if anything.
The problem is you need proof.

What if JFK was killed by some Chinaman?
Did they even check any of the Chinese restaurants in the area? No!
Well since they didn't investigate that angle it must have been.

Sound familiar ?

Look the conspiracy group keep telling us that more and more people are coming around to their side.
But after 14 years they have never been able to prove one single point in their grand conspiracy.
Even their Grand Poobah Richard Gage has never said exactly how the buildings were rigged.
All he does is ride the gravy train of gullible people by selling his conspiracy wares.

a reply to: Realtruth

What the heck is a Secret Service person doing in WTC 7 just before the collapse? At 2:54

Well lets see here. . . .
Maybe because they had offices in the building? Offices with secret documents?

Maybe I'm whacko but I would expect someone to close at hand until the last possible minute.

Now why don't you speculate why he was there ?????

originally posted by: samkent

Maybe I'm whacko but I would expect someone to close at hand until the last possible minute.

Now why don't you speculate why he was there ?????

Ignore the other videos and facts, but pick the honey pot I left. Love it.


How did he know the building was going to collapse by your comments?

A building made of steel has never in the history of fires collapsed like WTC 7, from a fire. And not just collapse but freefall.

a reply to: samkent

Easy now. I'm not playing an angle or trying to prove anything. All I wanted to know was if it was possible, just an honest question

If you watch the first video posted by realtruth they pose the question:
Why didn't the sprinklers put out the small fires in wtc7?

That tells me they are playing the the people with the least amount of knowledge of 911.

originally posted by: stosh64
Is there something new in THIS building 7 thread as opposed to
These?
www.abovetopsecret.com...
www.abovetopsecret.com...
www.abovetopsecret.com...
www.abovetopsecret.com...
www.abovetopsecret.com...
www.abovetopsecret.com...
www.abovetopsecret.com...
www.abovetopsecret.com...
www.abovetopsecret.com...
www.abovetopsecret.com...
www.abovetopsecret.com...

These are just building 7 threads. I could keep going but my browser locked up.

Is there anything in this thread that hasn't been talked to death already.
Everyone already has their minds made up. NOBODY ever listens to anybody else in these threads.
It always devolves into the same crap. Whats the point?

Boy someone peed in your cereal this morning, what a helpful addition to the discussion the OP has so kindly started.
I for one am enjoying the thread, I never tire of the topic and yes I have read almost every thread on this topic. Not all of them but enough to recognize a shut this thread down attempt when I see one.

S&F to the OP

Regards, Iwinder

a reply to: Iwinder

Thank you for your comments! I never tire of this subject either. I feel compelled to push this to everyone I know. I have put a presentation together for my family and friends, and I am having my first session in 45 minutes.

I am bound and determined to do my part in making people aware. The MSM sure isn't going to do it, nor has it ever.

originally posted by: AgentSmith now you see the real motivation behind the 'truth' movement and why it's defended so valiantly.

i'm in favour of truth. i don't want to be lied to. i have never made a red cent from those maxims.

the truth is free. but often costs a great deal.

originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: Zcustosmorum

as is the part of thermite being unable to bring down buildings.

You mean, "Nano Thermite", right? Please tell me how you rig a building for collapse with that? You are expert in material sciences, metallurgy, demolition?

I don't have the qualifications but these people certainly do. I have covered a lot of stuff on 9/11 over the years and I've even been open-minded enough to give the 9/11 conspiracy debunker stuff a chance, please show the same courtesy and at least hear these people out:

originally posted by: HAZE3
a reply to: samkent

Easy now. I'm not playing an angle or trying to prove anything. All I wanted to know was if it was possible, just an honest question

Hey, I would highly recommend this series of videos for you if you're interested in knowing about 9/11, out of the hundreds I've viewed, this is certainly the best of them:



Another thing, in regards to whoever pointed out about the amount of threads on 9/11, one thing you should notice is that these threads are ALWAYS heavily starred & flagged, why? Because more people now realize that some things are very wrong.

originally posted by: RoScoLaz4

originally posted by: stosh64Whats the point?

the point is not to let 9/11 go away, ever. the l-OS-ers hope that will happen. it's not going to.

We want Good Ol Dave back! And Gen Radek!!

But really, Building SIX is even MORE interesting than SEVEN.

As in WHY DID IT EXPLODE at the same time a plane was hitting a tower.

I would like a Thread done on Building SIX.

originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: Zcustosmorum

as is the part of thermite being unable to bring down buildings.

You mean, "Nano Thermite", right? Please tell me how you rig a building for collapse with that? You are expert in material sciences, metallurgy, demolition?

Thermite could have been used for sure, why would you say that it cannot ???

I would love to see how WTC7 got "damaged" by debris from the towers.

Perhaps several of the beams that were ejected 500 yards through the air as if shot by a Guns of Navarone Defgun impacted it ??

And somehow this damage was incredibly worse than all the other buildings around that got hammered with debris at least 1000 times the rate ??

And tell us how the fires inside got started that led to this amazing collapse, molten steel and temps at 1400 3 months later in WTC7 basement??

Fires that started oddly NOWHERE near where any of the debris impacted ??

And then tell us how debris and fires does the EXACT damage that a controlled demolition would do, even better actually, and how it all folded into such a nice pile !!

a reply to: ParasuvO

And tell us how the fires inside got started that led to this amazing collapse,

Severed steel and live power cables.