Life on Mars was ‘destroyed by nuclear attack’, says physicist – and we could be next

originally posted by: olaru12

originally posted by: Cobaltic1978
BIG claims require evidence and there isn't any.

Pure speculation.

Agreed...

He does have some impressive credentials however...

www.astroreview.com...

So he can be used as a puppet to derail the real reason why no life appears to be on the surface of Mars or come up with an excuse that aliens may have wiped out life on Mars or something???

...you think humans are going to be sent there to populate own species?

Maybe there will be an interplanetary breeding grounds between humans and aliens the government(s) of the world don't want us to know.

The safest place to do research on people and aliens will be Mars...seeing as Area 51 on Earth is pretty much not safe enough to keep secrets.

Attackers ??? more like they blew themselves up.......and here we are now, the descendents of the few that escaped and made it to Earth!

Of course there is no evidence, hardly anything that people believe are supported by evidence. I find it very interesting and I think it is a good thing for intelligent people to express their thoughts. There is a bunch of stuff in the nasa mars pics, it would make sense, I think we all are aware of pareidolia by now and some of the stuff looks like it isn't that. The age of the earth, the cosmos and when and how it began it primarily speculation and theory, there is no proof and the authors of those ideas have no proof. I think this topic is one that a person will have to conclude for them self. The first step would be how to identify a clone tool blur out in nasa Mars pics and look for stuff in those areas that were missed and at least the presence of humanoid activity and structure could show up. The comparisons he makes with the explosive remnants doesnt serve as proof but look at how things in general are determined.

a reply to: rowanflame

I think about that as well.

I'm not sure why so many people think intelligent humanoid life would evolve on Mars faster than Earth. I'm pretty sure it has been determined that Mars had an atmosphere for only the first 500 million years. I don't think any native life would evolve to intelligent beings in that relatively short amount of time.

Could be that they were at war with an intelligent force in possession of nuclear weapons. They could have destroyed themselves, however I would think the opposite may have happened. So the question is who took them out and could we face the same fate?

a reply to: CallYourBluff

I dont remember.....

lol

You know, the memory isnt the first thing to go.

What is the first thing to go?

I cant remember.

if the elites from mars had to come here in an emergency... they probably had to kill of the dinosaurs
before they could start a civilisation here... might also have been done with some left over nukes..
i believe we havnt found the crater thats supposedly had wiped out the dino but we do find glassy shards
all over earth.... wich u can find after a nuclear explosion test.... annyways.... new theories can only help us
once proven... u cant proof something u havent thought possible yet... so who knows how this will turn out...
i can imagine a dino race here..... would not be pleased getting wiped out... i wonder if we have found
dino bones... splattered all over.... i mean not perfect dino skeletons all in place but streched out over the land...
dunno gotta look into that...

Propaganda and conditioning for the big drop. So many nuke stories, so little time.

a reply to: Cobaltic1978

I'm not positing a theory. And neither is the author, as theories require evidence to back 'em up.

He's engaging in speculative science fiction. Which is fine, except he's also trying to pass it off as actual science.

And what i can read of his book looks like it was written by Hunter S. Thompson

Well if it could happen here it could have happened there too, we may be the next in line for nuclear devastation. By the way tax payers keep supporting thier governments to build more and more nuclear weapons so this seems to be our fate as well. Nukes are for our fellow human beings and for us, its really a shame, we could have really helped the world with the money we spent on war, I think its just a matter of time before this civilization blows itself up it may be our stupid destiny.

a reply to: FormOfTheLord

By the way tax payers keep supporting thier governments to build more and more nuclear weapons so this seems to be our fate as well.

You're sure about that, are you?
fas.org...

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: FormOfTheLord

By the way tax payers keep supporting thier governments to build more and more nuclear weapons so this seems to be our fate as well.

You're sure about that, are you?

fas.org...

Your link doesnt work, did you have anything on topic to add?

a reply to: FormOfTheLord

Yes.
You are wrong. Nuclear weapons stockpiles are not increasing.

Link works fine.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: FormOfTheLord



Yes.

You are wrong. Nuclear weapons stockpiles are not increasing.



Link works fine.

The link doesnt work for me so oh well, and I have a black projects bridge to sell you if you believe that nuclear technology and weaponry isnt always a field of development for the DOD.

New ways to destroy are something our government continually works towards.

Think tactical nukes, bio weapons, nanotech weapons, directed energy, etc, etc. . . The list goes on and on.
What we need is world peace, not world war is my point. We may end up a desolate planet destroyed by the powers that be for no good reason just like mars may have been destroyed.

a reply to: FormOfTheLord

What we need is world peace, not world war is my point.

Wow. What a concept. War is bad for people?

You should make a youtube video about it.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: FormOfTheLord

What we need is world peace, not world war is my point.

Wow. What a concept. War is bad for people?



You should make a youtube video about it.

There are already plenty of them out there, im not big on making videos, but if you would rather watch youtube as you claimed and want to make one about how a war could desolate the earth and make it a desolate planet, go on ahead. I dont see a problem with you making youtube videos. It may show how we could be likened to mars, and that we may be on a path of self destruction.

a reply to: FormOfTheLord

You don't see a problem with turning Earth into a desolate planet?
Actually, you're not alone. There are others on ATS who seem to look forward to a cometary impact and stuff like that.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: FormOfTheLord



You don't see a problem with turning Earth into a desolate planet?

Actually, you're not alone. There are others on ATS who seem to look forward to a cometary impact and stuff like that.

I dont see a problem with you making youtube videos, but I do see a problem with war, desolating the planet.

a reply to: FormOfTheLord
Me too. That would be bad.