Operation Indigo Skyfold

a reply to: Chadwickus

You linked to a thread, not a photo. Were you thinking it is up to me to scroll up and down the thread looking for the photo in question?

I get it that this is the original photo:



Please post the doctored one, and elaborate on it if possible.

a reply to: ConnectDots

The thread discusses the photo.

How much more elaboration do you want?

a reply to: Chadwickus

I repeat.

Please post the photo that you allege to be photoshopped by the "chemtards."

originally posted by: ConnectDots
a reply to: Chadwickus

I repeat.

Please post the photo that you allege to be photoshopped by the "chemtards."

who on here has called you a chemtard?

a reply to: network dude

Did I say someone called me a chemtard?

No, I did not.

The member responded to my question by referring to an answer given to another member.

The other member quoted the term "chemtard" - a term which Chadwickus coined, perhaps?

originally posted by: ConnectDots
a reply to: Chadwickus

I repeat.

Please post the photo that you allege to be photoshopped by the "chemtards."

doctored photo:


the original photo:


notice the absence of the "hazmat" photoshopped around the papers in the upper right hand area.

originally posted by: ConnectDots
a reply to: network dude

Did I say someone called me a chemtard?

No, I did not.

The member responded to my question by referring to an answer given to another member.

The other member quoted the term "chemtard" - a term which Chadwickus coined, perhaps?

If you identify with that, I can't stop you, but on this site, we try to operate with a bit more class. We don't call everyone who doesn't agree with us shills, and we don't call people chemtards. If you see it, please hit the alert button to remove the post.

originally posted by: ConnectDots
a reply to: Chadwickus

You linked to a thread, not a photo. Were you thinking it is up to me to scroll up and down the thread looking for the photo in question?

I get it that this is the original photo:

Please post the doctored one, and elaborate on it if possible.

The doctored one is here (on a chemmie site, of course)

educate-yourself.org...

The original one is here:

www.airliners.net...

a reply to: network dude
Thank you.

Now, I know what we're talking about:

originally posted by: network dude
If you identify with that. . .

I respectfully ask you to not put words in my mouth.

originally posted by: payt69
The doctored one is here (on a chemmie site, of course)

What is a "chemmie" site?

a reply to: payt69

I noticed a discrepancy between "sprayer 1" being referred to, yet "sprayer 5" is in the photograph. Perhaps that is insignificant, though?

Anyway, the conclusion of the exchange posted was that the photo is one of an ordinary commercial aircraft configured for flight certification.

a reply to: ConnectDots

A site run by chemmies. A 'chemmie' is how we affectionately call someone who believes in chemtrails.

Anyway, this whole 'chemtrail interior' thing has been long exposed as a hoax quite a while ago, despite these pictures making the rounds on just about every chemtrail site.

Most chemtrail believers realize this was a hoax now (even if the picture still shows up occasionally), so it doesn't show up too often anymore.

originally posted by: ConnectDots

originally posted by: payt69
The doctored one is here (on a chemmie site, of course)

What is a "chemmie" site?

Geoeng watch, Tanker Enemy, Dane Wigg's site, Alex Jones website...Take your pick.

They all used that image when then knew it was fake. Yet, the anger is directed at us debunkers and not them for making you guys look bad. How curious.

originally posted by: ConnectDots
a reply to: payt69

I noticed a discrepancy between "sprayer 1" being referred to, yet "sprayer 5" is in the photograph. Perhaps that is insignificant, though?

I guess it's an oversight of the witer, and probably insignificant.

Anyway, the conclusion of the exchange posted was that the photo is one of an ordinary commercial aircraft configured for flight certification.

Yes.. It's a prototype airliner. They go through a rigorous testing program, and this is one of the tests they perform to establish how an airliner behaves under different weigth distributions. The tanks contain water, and the water can be pumped around to shift the center of gravity, so the tests can be performed.

a reply to: ConnectDots

Your insinuation is wildly incorrect, I've never called anyone a chemtard. Ever

a reply to: payt69



A "hoax" is something that is intentionally put forward to deceive; just like a lie.

The Educate Yourself site - a chemmie site as you put it - shows clearly the process that the players went through to establish that the aircraft was an ordinary aircraft.

On another aspect of this dispute, I will quote this passage:

DISCLAIMER

I do not post this to imply that there are no chemtrails. In fact, I acknowledge these DO exist. My goal is to simply stay with the facts and not lead people astray, or permit others to think that a seriously mis-interpreted photo like this is something it isn't. Since chemtrail sprayers are among the blackest of the black projects, no one will risk being shot just to take a photo of the inside of one.

educate-yourself.org...

originally posted by: ConnectDots
a reply to: payt69

A "hoax" is something that is intentionally put forward to deceive; just like a lie.

The Educate Yourself site - a chemmie site as you put it - shows clearly the process that the players went through to establish that the aircraft was an ordinary aircraft.

On another aspect of this dispute, I will quote this passage:

DISCLAIMER

I do not post this to imply that there are no chemtrails. In fact, I acknowledge these DO exist. My goal is to simply stay with the facts and not lead people astray, or permit others to think that a seriously mis-interpreted photo like this is something it isn't. Since chemtrail sprayers are among the blackest of the black projects, no one will risk being shot just to take a photo of the inside of one.

educate-yourself.org...

That website may have done that ...NOW. But the hoax was very clearly deliberate when the image first surfaced. Im not sure why you insist on putting spins on everything. They lied, knowingly, about an image in order to get people scared. Thats it. There is nothing else that needs to be said about this.

And dirty tricks like this are still being done today by the usual suspects in order to keep their loyal following loyal and scared.

a reply to: Chadwickus

Were you quoted in error, then?

Or, did I misinterpret?

originally posted by: 3danimator2014
They all used that image when then knew it was fake.

How do you know they knew it was "fake"?