A Question That Evolutionist Couldn't Answer

a reply to: TechUnique

The problem with your argument is that the terms micro and marco have been taken out of context. They are simply used for taxonomic (classification) purposes and represent the same process.

If they were separate processes as you claim, the there has to be two unrelated mechanisms and a clear identifiable boundary between species. That just is not the case.

a reply to: TechUnique

Lmao.
Second line.

Great come back.

originally posted by: TechUnique

dr grady mcmurtry is a doctor of divinity - not very relevant to evolutionary biology

Dr. Grady S. McMurtry has served as a Regent and Adjunct Professor at the School of Theology in Columbus, Georgia, the school from which he obtained his Doctor of Divinity in 1996.

link

a reply to: AshOnMyTomatoes

The giraffe alway proves evolution.
Its to do with a nerve in its neck.
Can't link on me phone.

originally posted by: aynock

originally posted by: TechUnique

dr grady mcmurtry is a doctor of divinity - not very relevant to evolutionary biology

Dr. Grady S. McMurtry has served as a Regent and Adjunct Professor at the School of Theology in Columbus, Georgia, the school from which he obtained his Doctor of Divinity in 1996.

link

That video was to do with Young earth creation not evolution. The fact that the earth is way younger than what you guys believe is relevant.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: TechUnique

Lmao.
Second line.

Great come back.

Lmao.
Second line.

originally posted by: TechUnique

originally posted by: aynock
a reply to: TechUnique

You can pick and choose which bits of data supports your theory and then you can throw out anything else that doesn't fit it.

which 'bits of data' is being thrown out by evolutionary biologist (apart from the bible)?

Giants for instance. But I bet you guys think that every single documented case of Giants is forged.

EDIT TO ADD: I'll add more, seeing as I'm actually going to bed now.

Already mentioned Giants. There's also a lot of evidence to suggest Humans and Dinosaurs co-existed. There's also a lot of evidence for Young Earth theory. There's also reason to suggest that a lot of the dating methods are incorrect. There's more evidence than you'll ever accept because you're stuck in your belief system and would rather believe we evolved from slime.

Then there is the mounting of evidence backing up the validity of the Bible and many of the stories in the Bible such as Noah's Ark, the Nephilim(spelling?) and Sodom and Gomorah.

Oh please post the empirical and observed evidence of all of this when you have had your coffee and are up to it.

originally posted by: boymonkey74
a reply to: TechUnique

Imature?.
Better that than ignorant to everything but a man made version of god.

Ok so I'm ignorant of everything other than a man made version of God? You draw that conclusion based on my disbelief in evolution theory?

Alrighttey then. Bit of a jump but whatever floats your boat mate. (Doppelgangers apparently)

originally posted by: TechUnique

That video was to do with Young earth creation not evolution. The fact that the earth is way younger than what you guys believe is relevant.

Convenient that the main thing evolution requires (time) is also wrapped up in a neat little Creationist box that is not based on evidence and apparently not subject to scrutiny.

a reply to: TechUnique

No I draw that conclusion due to your past posts.

a reply to: boymonkey74

Ok well I state that the following video proves the validity of the Bible and Gods Judgement of Sodom & Gomorah.


Prove me wrong. If this isn't proof of Gods judgement then tell me what is the meaning and cause behind everything this guy uncovers.

By whatever time I wake up today I'm sure you will have come up with a very thoughtful and concise response. Or you can just ignore it and not watch the video, it's up to you. Good night.

a reply to: TechUnique

No thanks.
You are far too brainwashed to change your views.
Like I have said people show you the evidence you choose to either ignore it or you don't have the capability to understand it.
Which one?.

a reply to: TechUnique

Ok well I state

Well, that settles it then.

Wait... I state it proves nothing. I win.

originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: TechUnique

Ok well I state

Well, that settles it then.

Wait... I state it proves nothing. I win.

Ok I propose then (don't get ahead of yourself now Phage, this isn't a marriage proposal) that the video proves what I said. You can ignore the video if you want, or you can address it.

Same goes for you Boymonkey. Laters.

originally posted by: TechUnique
a reply to: boymonkey74

Ok well I state that the following video proves the validity of the Bible and Gods Judgement of Sodom & Gomorah.

Here's what science CAN do:
•Prove that a town that has been excavated could possibly be a candidate for the rediscovery of Sodom or Gomorah (provided that enough corroborating evidence shows that these towns EVER really existed and weren't just tools of allegory, and that the discovered towns were in fact them.)

Here's what science CAN'T do:
•Prove that anything that happened in said towns was supernatural

Assuming the towns DID turn out to be Sodom and Gomorah, here's what conclusions you CANNOT logically draw
•The entire rest of the Bible is literally true.

This would be like finding the remains of a human with deformed legs that vaguely resembled a goat's legs in an ancient Roman ruin, and assuming that satyrs must have really existed and that therefore all of Greek mythology must be true. Doesn't work like that.

a reply to: TechUnique

Why should anyone believe anything Ron Wyatt had to say?
www.tentmaker.org...

originally posted by: TechUnique
a reply to: boymonkey74

Ok well I state that the following video proves the validity of the Bible and Gods Judgement of Sodom & Gomorah.

Prove me wrong. If this isn't proof of Gods judgement then tell me what is the meaning and cause behind everything this guy uncovers.

By whatever time I wake up today I'm sure you will have come up with a very thoughtful and concise response. Or you can just ignore it and not watch the video, it's up to you. Good night.

Ron Wyatt has been proven to be a scam artist long ago...

www.bibleandscience.com...

So you refuse to accept science, which is based on facts. Or religion that is just stories shared over time. It was rare that anyone could even read or write back then. Not to mention even today when someone tells a story and it goes around for a while. Then it gets back to you. It is sensationalized to say the least. Back then it was an environment of story telling. That was the only public forum of entertainment. Now write these stories down decades or hundreds of years later. Some stories to are far out there. Remember this is back when society was so primitive they thought the sun revolved around the earth. It was impossible to fly, the world was flat. Constellations were gods. Ect........ You believe all that, all i can do is hope you evolve at some time.

And while we're on the subject of this Sodom and Gamorrah video; why does the evidence this guy provides satisfy you? It's a bunch of rocks in the ground. Were you there? Why is this "scientific evidence" good enough for you, but the mountain of work done on evolution, cosmology, etc is not good enough?

I believe in evolution. ( science ) Not magical beings.a reply to: AshOnMyTomatoes