It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: olaru12
originally posted by: Shamrock6
a reply to: olaru12
Unfortunately semantics matter. According to the Supreme Court what she said isnt an exemption of the free speech clause.
So, since it didn't violate the free speech clause and to my knowledge we don't have any laws pertaining to anti-Semitic speech, what should she have been charged with? Jerkiness? D-baggery?
I see what you mean...
www.americanbar.org...
I hope the social ramifications at her school will be called into play but she probably has plenty of support from the "Storm Front/White power" types. On the other hand her father should be questioned at length about his ideology, racism and ability to act responsibility on the force. I'll bet he is quite unhappy with his daughter opening up this can of worms.
I agree with you wholeheartedly on this. While I don't believe a crime was committed, I think she avoided charges on her status alone, and that is unfair. As others have said here, if it was a muslim person posting a picture of themselves wearing something bulky under their clothes with the caption "perfect time for bombing", they'd probably have DHS knocking on their door.
originally posted by: FraggleRock
I think the point here isn't that a crime was committed, or maybe it is. Rather this seems to show a level of bias that once again favors certain individuals. When someone, whether they be adults or teenagers, make obnoxious posts on the internet they sometimes face consequences. And who they are certainly plays a role. Even the source article poses a valid point.
Who here would argue that had this been a Muslim, the results would be the same? How about what others have suggested. Who would argue that had the target been police officers and the person posting had no relations to law enforcement, the outcome would have been the same?
Do I believe a crime was committed here? No I do not.
Do I believe that decision is universal? No I do not. And I think that is the point.
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
Why would her father being antisemitic matter? Thought crimes are not crimes. He can believe whatever he wants, no matter how insane or looney it is. What matters is what he does. Does he have any reports of bigoted actions? If so...then action those. But you can't action a father for what their daughter thinks. Nor for what he thinks.
What brand of "freedom" is this?
originally posted by: EyesOpenMouthShut
I have to agree with the more calm posters in that she didn't actually commit a crime and she's a bigot. I'm just amazed that she didn't get picked up and interrogated by someone
originally posted by: olaru12
originally posted by: EyesOpenMouthShut
I have to agree with the more calm posters in that she didn't actually commit a crime and she's a bigot. I'm just amazed that she didn't get picked up and interrogated by someone
I would imagine her Facebook and twitter pages are being gone over with a fine tooth comb, looking for actual threats to individuals or groups. We haven't heard the last of this.....
Agreed. Yes there are some warning signs she probably exhibited that he may have ignored, or maybe she's just REALLY dumb and didn't know that what she was doing was a BAD thing, either way a father cannot control every single aspect of a growing teen's life. If a good portion of her high school friends were neo-nazis or what have you, she could have easily hidden that fact from her father.
originally posted by: Shamrock6
a reply to: olaru12
I personally know a girl who was introduced to Jew hating by a boyfriend she had a few years ago. She's dumped him and changed her tune back to not hating them.
The rush to convict dad of being a Jew hater really boggles my mind.
The father of young woman refused to answer questions about her activities and the activities of her friends telling a reporter, “You’re talking about a minor. No interviews.”
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
originally posted by: olaru12
originally posted by: EyesOpenMouthShut
I have to agree with the more calm posters in that she didn't actually commit a crime and she's a bigot. I'm just amazed that she didn't get picked up and interrogated by someone
I would imagine her Facebook and twitter pages are being gone over with a fine tooth comb, looking for actual threats to individuals or groups. We haven't heard the last of this.....
I would say if we have to go over whimsical comments made on line with a "fine tooth comb"....we aren't serving justice.