It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
This is just a tiny tip of the iceberg, it goes so much deeper. This is relatively nothing compared to the real corruption.
originally posted by: HotLoad
a reply to: stosh64
This is just a tiny tip of the iceberg, it goes so much deeper. This is relatively nothing compared to the real corruption.
Yes but they can still pretend like they stuck it to the man with this one and resume the desired programming next episode.
originally posted by: HotLoad
a reply to: TechUnique
What are you complaining about? I wasn't talking to you.
originally posted by: HotLoad
a reply to: TechUnique
Well excuse me for making a comment on an open forum......
originally posted by: yuppa
Yall just now realizing the UK is where their true power has always been?
‘Detector vans are a myth,’ the UKIP MEP Gerard Batten, a long-time campaigner against the licence fee, told me this week.
‘Prosecution [for not having a TV licence] depends on the accused being caught in the act of watching live broadcasts, or admitting to it. The non-existent threat of Detector Van evidence is just a means of getting suspects to incriminate themselves.’
Sceptics such as Batten point out there isn’t a single documented case in British legal history in which so-called ‘detection evidence’ from vans has been used to prosecute a licence fee evader.
This was, sheepishly, confirmed by the BBC in 2011 in response to a (hitherto unreported) Freedom of Information request.
Read more: www.dailymail.co.uk... gle-prosecution.html#ixzz3QvqUBKOk