It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Mind acrobatics must be performed to justify the widespread killing of domestic companions when you consider that there has not been a movement on the part of postal workers and all forms of delivery people to be allowed to shoot animals that they come into personal contact with on a daily basis. Nor would society be too keen on arming them for indiscriminate blasting or cutting - not even for fear's sake.
They shoot dogs before there would even be a remote possibility. It's the end of every senselessly bloody story where the owner is left to clean the mess; left with the bill and a ticket. "All I have to say is that I feel they're a threat."
Unfortunately, witnesses often report the dog's friendly demeanor, but officers will falsify reports or say "there was a look in his eye." They offer absurd, irrational responses. They intrude on someone's property and then claim the dog was "aggressing" them, when it barks or approaches. They cry "Pitbull!" when it's not, nor is that a cause for execution. Let's not forget that killing animals for no cause is a hallmark of psychopaths. www.activistpost.com...
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
the difference: mindset. Police are employed and trained to look for threats. Postal carriers aren't.
originally posted by: ScientificRailgun
Sadly, there's not much room in a police officer's utility belt for tactical doggy treats.
I really wish cops would watch this video.
Dogs, as did many in the video, learn to expect your daily visit.
originally posted by: bigfatfurrytexan
the difference: mindset. Police are employed and trained to look for threats. Postal carriers aren't.