It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
BloodyDagger wrote:
How do you explain the double rows of teeth reported to be found on these giant skeletons over the years? That is a common theme with "Giant Skeletons" - Double rows of teeth.
One or two maybe a birth defect, sure. But not when its reported every single time a supposed giant skeleton is discovered somewhere. Not to mention, the double rows of teeth go all the way around. Its not just a doubled tooth here or there, its the entire set of teeth that is double rowed.
STRANGE SKELETONS FOUND.
__
Indications That Tribe Hitherto Unknown Once Lived in Wisconsin.
Special to the New York Times.
MADISON, Wis., May 3.—The discovery of several skeletons of human beings while excavating a mound at Lake Delavan indicates that a heretofore unknown race of men once inhabited Southern Wisconsin. Information of the discovery was brought to Madison to-day by Maurice Morrissey, of Delavan, who came here to attend a meeting of the Republican State Central committee. Curator Charles E. Brown of the State Historical Museum will investigate the discoveries within a few days.
Upon opening one large mound at Lake Lawn farm, eighteen skeletons were discovered by the Phillips Brothers. The heads, presumably those of men, are much larger than the head of any race which inhabit America to-day. From directly over the eye sockets, the head slopes straight back and the nasal bones protrude far above the cheek bones. The jaw bones are long and pointed, bearing a minute resemblance to the head of the monkey. The teeth in the front of the jaw are regular molars.
There were also found in the mounds the skeletons, presumably of women, which had smaller heads, but were similar in facial characteristics. The skeletons were embedded in charcoal and covered over with layers of baked clay to shed water from the sepulcher.
Lets take a look at some of Kristian T Harris’ other recent headlines –
Bill Cooper Predicted 9/11 in June of 2001, Killed Shortly After
originally posted by: Sahabi
a reply to: ReturnofTheSonOfNothing
Lets take a look at some of Kristian T Harris’ other recent headlines –
Bill Cooper Predicted 9/11 in June of 2001, Killed Shortly After
William Milton Cooper did predict 9/11 and named Osama bin Laden as the boogeyman. He was assassinated by plain clothes law enforcement officers in an ambush on his own property for his truth work.
First of all even a broken clock is right twice a day. Have you read "Behold a Pale Horse"?
Cooper threw out many, many predictions on all kind of things, pretty much all of which did not come to pass.
Third, the statement that Cooper was assassinated for this information does not hold up to any real scrutiny, and is not supported by the facts, IMO. Cooper was killed because he shot at law enforcement. When you shoot at law enforcement death is a predictable result.
November 5, 2001
That evening the Apache County Sheriff's Department would come to Bill's home at 11:15pm fully armed to serve a warrant for his arrest. The local Eager Police Department was not notified until after Bill was killed.
"At that point Sergeant Brown saw Cooper extend his right arm out of the driver's side open window as if he were surrendering."
- Arizona Department of Public Safety Investigative Report
originally posted by: ReturnofTheSonOfNothing
a reply to: Sahabi
Please, if you want to have that discussion, start a new thread, I will not debate that here it is off topic.
originally posted by: Rosinitiate
a reply to: Sahabi
When you see an active and overt attempt to tarnish someones image and reputation, it is always worth a second look. Which incidentally is why I find Alex Jones to be the reverse or opposite Cooper. Notice no attempt by certain forces to shut him down huh.
Getting back to topic, I haven't the faintest idea if Giants are/were real. If I've learned nothing else in my short time here, is that many of the legends I heard as a child always seems to carry some truth, if only marginally. Personally, I would be surprised to learn that there are areas deep under our ocean that is habitable by land and if so, probably is. Does that make the possibilities of mermaids to exist? Hell if I know.
originally posted by: Logarock
originally posted by: Rosinitiate
a reply to: Sahabi
When you see an active and overt attempt to tarnish someones image and reputation, it is always worth a second look. Which incidentally is why I find Alex Jones to be the reverse or opposite Cooper. Notice no attempt by certain forces to shut him down huh.
Getting back to topic, I haven't the faintest idea if Giants are/were real. If I've learned nothing else in my short time here, is that many of the legends I heard as a child always seems to carry some truth, if only marginally. Personally, I would be surprised to learn that there are areas deep under our ocean that is habitable by land and if so, probably is. Does that make the possibilities of mermaids to exist? Hell if I know.
I have read a good deal of criticism focused on alternative archeological types and most of it is not scholarly at all. Most of it is straw man building and then setting it on fire. And once they set their sights on a target it really doesn't matter about credentials or anything. Same thing in the UFO debunking field.