It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Klassified
a reply to: FyreByrd
This is a joke, right?
Even if Satan existed, I doubt he would want anything to do with Republicrats or Democans. The Devil doesn't usually have any interest in those with no souls.
originally posted by: ketsuko
Who better to ask than someone who follows the party that removed God from the platform and booed Him three times when it was decided that move wasn't "politic" and they better try to get them to vote to put Him back in.
Ah irony.
This thread reminds me of the time when that BS story was circulating after all those hurricanes hit Florida. You know the one ... God was punishing Florida for not voting for Al Gore or something.
Yes, God and Satan are only instruments the left uses when they think they can score points with them. Like now.
originally posted by: Tangerine
originally posted by: FyreByrd
Thom Hartmann is always great to listen to and I don't often get the chance. He is meticulous about his facts and sources and his reasoning is sound. He is respectful and honest with everyone.
His website is a treasure trove of links to information about all manner of topics.
www.thomhartmann.com...
And he brings up an interesting point, I'm sure most of you are aware that the GOP changed their logo, changed how the stars on the elephant sit. Rather then the vitrium man 5-pointed start where the star points up, it now is the pentagram star pointing down.
The pentagram has nothing to do with Satan. Whether Satan even exists is another matter. Next, you people will claim that the spork is a Satanic conspiracy.
The Order of the Eastern Star, an organization associated with Freemasonry (established 1850), used to have a point-down pentagram as its symbol, with the five isosceles triangles of the points colored blue, yellow, white, green, and red (the logo has been changed slightly[year needed] and is now a five-pointed star with an inscribed pentagon, but no longer a pentagram)
-wiki
originally posted by: FyreByrd
Thom Hartmann is always great to listen to and I don't often get the chance. He is meticulous about his facts and sources and his reasoning is sound. He is respectful and honest with everyone.
His website is a treasure trove of links to information about all manner of topics.
www.thomhartmann.com...
And he brings up an interesting point, I'm sure most of you are aware that the GOP changed their logo, changed how the stars on the elephant sit. Rather then the vitrium man 5-pointed start where the star points up, it now is the pentagram star pointing down.
Has the GOP Been Taken Over by Satan?
originally posted by: NOTurTypical
a reply to: FyreByrd
The devil stacks the deck, he has his fingers in both parties.
originally posted by: ketsuko
originally posted by: khnum
Yep put 'Mitt Romney' in the bible codes and both he and the name Bush pop up in a very very unauspicious manner.
Interesting. I've seen plenty of Bible Codes with Obama's name in very bad places too.
Tit for tat.
originally posted by: FyreByrd
originally posted by: NOTurTypical
a reply to: FyreByrd
The devil stacks the deck, he has his fingers in both parties.
I don't disagree with your statement but it's not relevant to the topics which are rather specific.
1) The republicans who carry on about their christianity don't behave in a very christian manner (doesn't matter whether or not the democrats do - they don't tend to make a 'stand' of 'faith' or 'family values').
2) Why did the republican party change the orientation of the stars on their elephant (doesn't matter about the democrate donkey).
Most replies aren't responding to those specific points and are only, I don't have a word, reacting with a generalized negative response to the post for their own reasons.
Saying the democrats (or any other group) does it too, or is just as bad, or whatever is not an argument against what the piece says nor does it add to any conversation on either topic.
Personally, I'd like to hear what people think about the possible reasoning about the republican trade mark change. Maybe it was just an unthoughtful attempt at 'rebranding' by young folk who didn't know some of the symbolism. Or maybe it was a not-so-subtle 'fu' to belivers. But I don't for a minute think it just happened for no reason.
The contrairiness of repulican talk and walk, well you'd have to be blind not to see it. As for democrats, it's not that big of a 'selling' point.