It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: FormOfTheLord
we just need nanobots to take in a pill form that form around the visual cortex and give you the ability to mentally be online.
originally posted by: Expat888
Oh goody .. another high tech toy to further distract.. disconnect .. and program people ... keeping them nice and docile under big brothers bootheel...
originally posted by: FormOfTheLord
If they cant incorporate a mobile device I cant see anyone buying it in droves.
They need to look at augmented reality applications that dont involve putting things on your body, especially your head, because people dont want to put things on over thier bodies other than thier normal clothes.
Keep in mind putting things on your head just looks too stupid for the public to ever really accept.
originally posted by: Darkblade71
Well, cable tv will start to die off.
One of the things I have been watching and noticing with the idea of augmented reality is that you can have whatever size tv you want in your living room. TV sales will drop.
I'm hoping microsoft takes this to the xbox one with a more gamer idea in mind, kind of like
Oculus Rift.
I want to sit on top of a mountain in skyrim!
lol
originally posted by: topquark
originally posted by: Darkblade71
Well, cable tv will start to die off.
One of the things I have been watching and noticing with the idea of augmented reality is that you can have whatever size tv you want in your living room. TV sales will drop.
I'm hoping microsoft takes this to the xbox one with a more gamer idea in mind, kind of like
Oculus Rift.
I want to sit on top of a mountain in skyrim!
lol
old-style movies shown on two-dimensional screens will also become obsolete. Imagine being in an interactive movie where you find yourself right in the middle of the action and the actors seem to be standing around you instead of on a screen in front of you.
originally posted by: neo96
The limiting factor of that technology is internet speed.
Given the sheer massive amounts of data instantly being shared/distributed in milliseconds of everything pretty much.
Your taking terabit and beyond.
Like all cutting edge technology what is it sold as isn't going to be what the real life version is.
It will take decades, and the infrastructure will be a nightmare.
originally posted by: topquark
originally posted by: Darkblade71
Well, cable tv will start to die off.
One of the things I have been watching and noticing with the idea of augmented reality is that you can have whatever size tv you want in your living room. TV sales will drop.
I'm hoping microsoft takes this to the xbox one with a more gamer idea in mind, kind of like
Oculus Rift.
I want to sit on top of a mountain in skyrim!
lol
old-style movies shown on two-dimensional screens will also become obsolete. Imagine being in an interactive movie where you find yourself right in the middle of the action and the actors seem to be standing around you instead of on a screen in front of you.
originally posted by: SaturnFX
I am at a age I suppose where I want the ability to physically remove/unplug anything should the need arise. I think that's a safe halfway point for now. nanobots forever in my body that can connect online..not liking that prospect.
originally posted by: honested3
Ah yes this technology leads me closer to what I have been waiting for my whole life, fully immersive virtual reality. I will be among the first to buy this, if only I had enough time to spend days, months, years in full virtual immersion.
Stuff like this... God I just wish the world could just put aside all of it's differences and just work towards furthering this technology, true virtual reality will be the new age and I am on board 100%
If I may also add, being a transgender woman and feeling so limited in my physical form, I feel technology and virtual reality is what will break the chains that I feel have held me back my whole life. Though that may be an entirely different topic on its own, exciting stuff that I wish was available now!
originally posted by: Rocker2013
a reply to: SaturnFX
Yeah, and remember the promos for Google Glass? So many promises made, and it never delivered on any of it.
I was watching some videos just yesterday about things "you never knew existed" all about new tech products, but the thing was almost none of them had actually been invented yet, they were just concepts, not even prototypes.
Most of them were marketing things that existed only on paper, they conveniently overlook the facts and the hurdles of actually manufacturing the product and the systems we would need in place to make them functional.
Why do they do it? Because they hope that someone at Google will see their little garage science project and the posh video they made and buy the company for a billion $'s. And the sad part is, maybe Google will buy that company, primarily because it wants to stop any competitors for projects it's already working on, or wants to grab the rights to an idea they didn't think of.
This new gadget might work in a Microsoft lab, with gigantic computing power behind it, but until I actually have one of these in my hands to try out, it's nothing more than a clever video making promises they might be able to deliver on in a decade, if they spend a few more billion on it and can make it affordable for more than the ten richest people in the US.
originally posted by: SaturnFX
originally posted by: Rocker2013
a reply to: SaturnFX
Yeah, and remember the promos for Google Glass? So many promises made, and it never delivered on any of it.
I was watching some videos just yesterday about things "you never knew existed" all about new tech products, but the thing was almost none of them had actually been invented yet, they were just concepts, not even prototypes.
Most of them were marketing things that existed only on paper, they conveniently overlook the facts and the hurdles of actually manufacturing the product and the systems we would need in place to make them functional.
Why do they do it? Because they hope that someone at Google will see their little garage science project and the posh video they made and buy the company for a billion $'s. And the sad part is, maybe Google will buy that company, primarily because it wants to stop any competitors for projects it's already working on, or wants to grab the rights to an idea they didn't think of.
This new gadget might work in a Microsoft lab, with gigantic computing power behind it, but until I actually have one of these in my hands to try out, it's nothing more than a clever video making promises they might be able to deliver on in a decade, if they spend a few more billion on it and can make it affordable for more than the ten richest people in the US.
Already demoed. there are also plenty of articles out now of people (journalists) who have already been allowed to test em out.
Will be out "within the windows 10 timeframe). It was actually suggested July of this year (2015). Info is still up in the air about such details, but no, this is not just some idea by Microsoft. it is a already implemented product that is going through its finishing touches.
but I do understand and appreciate the skepticism. I was never a big fan of google glass. seemed very limited and silly frankly.
This I am on board with though