It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
"But the fact that we did not see light in other wavelengths eliminates a number of astronomical phenomena that are associated with violent events such as gamma-ray bursts from exploding stars and supernovae, which were otherwise candidates for the burst," explains Daniele Malesani.
"The theories are now that the radio wave burst might be linked to a very compact type of object -- such as neutron stars or black holes and the bursts could be connected to collisions or 'star quakes'. Now we know more about what we should be looking for," says Daniele Malesani.
originally posted by: Akatsuki
A strange phenomenon has been observed by astronomers right as it was happening -- a 'fast radio burst'. The eruption is described as an extremely short, sharp flash of radio waves from an unknown source in the universe. The results have been published in the Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
While it’s interesting to imagine how far our radio signals have traveled into space, it’s extremely unlikely that an alien civilization will be able to catch the latest episode of ‘I Love Lucy’. This is thanks to the inverse square law. In Layman’s term, it’s a form of signal degradation.
As radio signals leave earth, they propagate out in a wave form. Just like dropping a stone in a lake, the waves diffuse or “spread out” over distance thanks to the exponentially larger area they must encompass. The area can be calculated by multiplying length times width which is why we measure it in square units – square centimeters, square miles, etc. This means that the further away from the source, the more square units of area a signal has to ‘illuminate’.inverse square law
Another way to think of it, is that the strength of a radio signal will be only 1/4 as great once you are twice the distance from the source. At ten times the distance, the strength of the signal would only be one hundredth as great.
Because of this inverse square law, all of our terrestrial radio signals become indistinguishable from background noise at around a few light-years from earth. For a civilization only a couple hundred light-years away, trying to listen to our broadcasts would be like trying to detect the small ripple from a pebble dropped in the pacific ocean off the coast of California – from Japan.
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
Imagine a species with 5.5 BILLION years of technological advancement over us. They would have had to have evolved extremely quickly, and would be so far beyond us we would not even be ants to them.
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
a reply to: JadeStar
Quite honestly it's almost amazing to think about what will happen in the next 100 years. Imagine near 6 BILLION years of advancement. What would be possible is beyond terrifying.
originally posted by: stumason
a reply to: JadeStar
How can you possibly know how old "most planets in the Galaxy" are?
While I agree with the sentiment that most Alien life we will eventually encounter will be older than us, there is no way you can possibly know the age of the planets without actually having travelled there and do the same geological work we have done on our own planet to determine it's age.
originally posted by: Silcone Synapse
a reply to: Akatsuki
Lets hope its not like this:
Another planet in the depths of the void just like ours,with intelligent life-they have tamed radio waves for communication just like us two legged freaks on what we call "Earth".
They use a kind of encryption burst format,that is as yet beyond our knowledge and capabilities.
We have recieved a transmission,and with time we shall decode it.
Lets hope it is a friendly species.
Although the odds are against that.
originally posted by: buster2010
originally posted by: strongfp
originally posted by: buster2010
originally posted by: strongfp
originally posted by: Aleister
If you are hinting that it may be an alien signal, then the thing to do would be to slow down the recording of the signal by tens or hundreds of times. A short burst to us could be a Seinfeld episode to the folks on the other end. Or thousands of times, and you get "The English Patient".
A radio wave that fast would be on par with a blue tooth signal.
If it were TV show or a song, or a recording, it would not be that fast.
That's by our technology. If it were a civilization that is a million or even a billion years more advanced than we are that signal could hold as much information as the library of congress.
Radio waves don't hold that much information. Radio waves are created in nature all the time a short bust simply means it has a chance it's not natural.
Please understand that humans have only taken a few baby steps on a thousand mile journey when it comes to understanding the universe. Our knowledge of how radio wave can be manipulated is limited to our knowledge of them. There could be information imprinted on every sub atomic particle.
we are pretty darn advanced in my books.