It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The government counts only people actively looking for jobs as unemployed. T
originally posted by: neo96
originally posted by: Connector
originally posted by: neo96
And under the Obama economy over 100 million people are out of work
So the unemployment is really 33%ish? One in three americans are unemployed? Link please.....
www.businessinsider.com...
Civilian noninstitutional population is defined as persons 16 years of age and older residing in the 50 states and the District of Columbia, who are not inmates of institutions (e.g., penal and mental facilities, homes for the aged), and who are not on active duty in the Armed Forces.
The series comes from the 'Current Population Survey (Household Survey)'
True, but to be fair, this is how it's always been done. However economists know what to really look at when judging the health of the economy.
originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: Bilk22
The government counts only people actively looking for jobs as unemployed. T
And the people who just give up because they can't find anything.
Don't get counted.
Fuzzy government accounting.
Instead of calling BS why not look for the real numbers?
originally posted by: Indigo5
originally posted by: neo96
originally posted by: Connector
originally posted by: neo96
And under the Obama economy over 100 million people are out of work
So the unemployment is really 33%ish? One in three americans are unemployed? Link please.....
www.businessinsider.com...
Just have to call out your BS here as it is just so ...
Your link above shows an obscure graph from 2012...Specifically the CNP16OV..see below
Your OP-ED cites it while discussing the "real" unemployment numbers...Looks like a pretty ugly graph doesn't it?
Ya know what the CNP16OV is????
POPULATION IN THE USA OVER THE AGE OF 16, NOT UNEMPLOYMENT.
Civilian noninstitutional population is defined as persons 16 years of age and older residing in the 50 states and the District of Columbia, who are not inmates of institutions (e.g., penal and mental facilities, homes for the aged), and who are not on active duty in the Armed Forces.
The series comes from the 'Current Population Survey (Household Survey)'
research.stlouisfed.org...
Yes..it shows that people live longer these days...Now if the GOP can only get those pesky elderly and retired to WORK!
originally posted by: SpaDe_
As far as taking credit for the GDP increase, why don't we wait for January 30 when the 4th quarter numbers get released before we get all excited about the "growth".
I see your chart and raise you
originally posted by: Indigo5
originally posted by: SpaDe_
As far as taking credit for the GDP increase, why don't we wait for January 30 when the 4th quarter numbers get released before we get all excited about the "growth".
Right..wait for January numbers before declaring a trend! Ignore the last 60 months! The GOP CHEERING FOR THE US ECONOMY TO FAIL
originally posted by: Bilk22
Instead of calling BS why not look for the real numbers?
originally posted by: Indigo5
originally posted by: neo96
originally posted by: Connector
originally posted by: neo96
And under the Obama economy over 100 million people are out of work
So the unemployment is really 33%ish? One in three americans are unemployed? Link please.....
www.businessinsider.com...
Just have to call out your BS here as it is just so ...
Your link above shows an obscure graph from 2012...Specifically the CNP16OV..see below
Your OP-ED cites it while discussing the "real" unemployment numbers...Looks like a pretty ugly graph doesn't it?
Ya know what the CNP16OV is????
POPULATION IN THE USA OVER THE AGE OF 16, NOT UNEMPLOYMENT.
Civilian noninstitutional population is defined as persons 16 years of age and older residing in the 50 states and the District of Columbia, who are not inmates of institutions (e.g., penal and mental facilities, homes for the aged), and who are not on active duty in the Armed Forces.
The series comes from the 'Current Population Survey (Household Survey)'
research.stlouisfed.org...
Yes..it shows that people live longer these days...Now if the GOP can only get those pesky elderly and retired to WORK!
U6 < HERE
originally posted by: Indigo5
Mitt Romney promised by the end of his first term (December 2016) he would achieve
GDP Growth 4% by end of 2016
Unemployment at 5.9% by the end of 2016
www.nationalreview.com...
Current (December 2014)
GDP Growth is 5%
Unemployment is at 5.6%
Michelle Bachmann promised us in 2012 that she would give us $2 gas by 2016 if we made her President!
Bachmann: I'll bring back $2 gas
money.cnn.com...
We are now at $2 dollars a gallon 2 years later. Though Bachmann would like us to believe she made it happen
Stock Market?
Unemployment?
The work that remains to be done is average wages and over-sized income distribution disparity…both topics that the GOP very loudly OPPOSE addressing.
So I am just curious…since the current President has exceeded the ambitious claims the GOP candidates for President made, and done so two years early…what economic policy criticisms will they employ in the coming election? By all objective accounts, the GOP should be applauding the economic achievements of this administration.
Oh and instead of just regurgitating a chart with little reference to the true economy and population, it's useless and really false.
originally posted by: Indigo5
originally posted by: SpaDe_
As far as taking credit for the GDP increase, why don't we wait for January 30 when the 4th quarter numbers get released before we get all excited about the "growth".
Right..wait for January numbers before declaring a trend! Ignore the last 60 months! The GOP CHEERING FOR THE US ECONOMY TO FAIL
LOL yeah and you do realize that all the numbers are higher than they've ever been? Is math your strong suit?
originally posted by: Indigo5
originally posted by: Bilk22
I see your chart and raise you
originally posted by:
Link
You do realize that chart shows three different unemployment Measures ALL DIVING DOWNWARD since the president took office?
Using the charts and data provided, point to the lies. Go ahead if you're capable Mr. Professional.
originally posted by: boymonkey74
a reply to: Indigo5
I was just about to say that it does appear in my professional opinion that the graph does indeed show unemployment lowering since around 2009.
lol.
This thread is so funny obvious OB haters getting the stars they want while posting falsehoods.
Me not that bothered but blimey the right wing element of ATS sure love to tell fibs and mudsling.
originally posted by: Bilk22
Oh and instead of just regurgitating a chart with little reference to the true economy and population, it's useless and really false.
originally posted by: Indigo5
originally posted by: SpaDe_
As far as taking credit for the GDP increase, why don't we wait for January 30 when the 4th quarter numbers get released before we get all excited about the "growth".
Right..wait for January numbers before declaring a trend! Ignore the last 60 months! The GOP CHEERING FOR THE US ECONOMY TO FAIL
Here this should help you.
The Fiscal and Economic Impact of Immigration on the United States
This looks pretty real and the way the data is collected and the parameters haven't changed.
originally posted by: ISawItFirst
Any chart or graph that does not show its math on either side, is propaganda. They have changed the formula so many times no two pieces of data are apples to apples. There is no factual argument to be had here, it's all disinformation and zealotry.
originally posted by: ISawItFirst
Any chart or graph that does not show its math on either side, is propaganda. They have changed the formula so many times no two pieces of data are apples to apples. There is no factual argument to be had here, it's all disinformation and zealotry.