Earth Booms and Alien War

Examples please of when "THEY" have used aliens as a coverup for anything. When did any authority ever say that ET did something to cover their own actions? I must have missed that in the news or history books. reply to: sled735

Nothing like getting to the last page of a thread to find out once again I'm talking to myself and no one else is here. Oh well.

Ohh nice we can all celebrate 2015 when the aliens mass land and a new era begins! Out with the old in with the new!

a reply to: sled735
I'll give you the inter-dimensional space part. But maybe just maybe the "Booms" are the after effects of folding space in an atmosphere. As far as fighting for us, I occasionally try not to step on an ant now and then. Are we as a race worth fighting for, I want to hope yes. Can only imagine how bad and cruel other space faring beings could be. It could be that one alien race is attacking the other that is hiding out here. When I was young I was taught anything is possible, well almost...

originally posted by: Bedlam
a reply to: Baddogma

If YOU were getting a TDY off-planet, which would you rather do? Planet Dirt, which has been continuously occupied for years without the garrison coming down with a case of axillary giraffe heads, hasn't got much in the way of life-forms except what looks like a pretty much monoclonal algae in what passes for an ocean, and two forms of lichen and that's about it, OR what's behind door #2...

a planet with a real, chirally compatible biosphere? If you can eat it, it can eat you, I always say. Although you can probably expect a lot of new, novel antibiotics in about 10 years, I'd guess, if you don't get anything else out of it.

Well, Wampa meat may be the new Kobe beef....

originally posted by: BigfootNZ
a reply to: sled735

People where saying the exact same thing 4-5 years back, and 10 years before that... if these others who are going to reveal themselves 'soon' are this tardy then we have nothing to fear from em.

Oh but wait... time for them in their other dimension or what ever is different so we cant be sure just when it will happen, but trust us when we say it will happen 'soon'.

Apocalyptic doom porn, nothing more nothing less just with an alien bent to catch another demographic of gullible willing to buy books and take seminars.

Your arrogance is amusing

originally posted by: mbkennel
Well, Wampa meat may be the new Kobe beef....

As long as you like tentacles, or whatever you got there. Everyone thinks a new planet will look like Star Trek where it's all pine trees or whatever was around Paramount's backlot.

I'm betting it's more disgusting than that, something much more early Cambrian explosion-y.

eta: then again, I like calamari, so maybe a plate-sized slice with purple goo sauce wouldn't be bad...

originally posted by: AutumnWitch657
Examples please of when "THEY" have used aliens as a coverup for anything. When did any authority ever say that ET did something to cover their own actions? I must have missed that in the news or history books. reply to: sled735

I saw that on a show, or read it in an article or something, but I don't remember which one; I've seen/read so many.
It said that the military was building flying craft similar to what alien spaceships look like (using their technology) and to keep the other countries from finding out, they just allowed people to think it was a UFO to cover up that it was actually them; saying it was a UFO wouldn't have a lot of credibility for most people (sadly).

They have been experimenting with making military craft have some type of invisible shield for some time now, to make it invisible in our skies. I've read that several times.

originally posted by: AutumnWitch657
Experts is a rather vague word in this context. Expert in what exactly? Mysterious sound experts?Alien battle expert's? There were some booms here in Hampton Roads VA and you know who looked into it? The news people and the police. I'm surrounded by military bases here. There are over fifty installations within a 70 mile radius. None of their experts in military affairs investigated a thing. Someone writing "experts investigated " need to say who these experts were or at least what they are experts in.
Sounds like words to pull in the gullible. Nothing in that story about the remote viewers sounds believable at all.


a reply to: sled735

If you would have bothered to read the link in my OP you would have seen the answer to your questions and could have saved us both some time with this post.

a reply to: sled735

Oh yes. That was Roswell. They let Russia think it was ET.

originally posted by: AutumnWitch657
Examples please of when "THEY" have used aliens as a coverup for anything. When did any authority ever say that ET did something to cover their own actions? I must have missed that in the news or history books. reply to: sled735

e statmebts found in some documents recently released by the air force. The thought is that the cover of possible aliens would be the best way to hidde tech from other countries. So when they would be spotted doing a test run on new planes they would have the news run a fake story in some cases. I can not remember exactly but maybe majestic12 docs.

a reply to: deadeyedick

And therein lies the question... high tech vehicles (at least) exist... have since the 40's (at the least)... and if not swiped from aliens, then where? And if simply from human savants... then we have a whole sector of humans existing in "the future" and a whole lot more existing in "the now" technologically speaking, anyway.

Either way (Aliens, savants, found ancient leftover tech a la secret space force) we have some amazing tech enabling a small portion of us to take the next evolutionary step while the rest play guessing games and catch up. Not really a great situation.

It seems to have gone beyond keeping it secret to protect us from ourselves.... sucks being a peasant.

I hate Calamari...

a reply to: Baddogma

perhaps the next step was created to rid the world of certain types of people? Me thinks we have it pretty good here we just need a few small changes that can be made once the path is clear. Refer to bedlams post earlier in thread

a reply to: deadeyedick

Yup... the calamri reference referred to McKennle/Bedlam's exchange!

I'm with ya, you crazy mystic.

originally posted by: AutumnWitch657
a reply to: sled735

Oh yes. That was Roswell. They let Russia think it was ET.

Yes, of course, Roswell, but there have been more since then. I've seen many articles on f/b about craft being covered with cloud-like mist, and other cloaking devices to avoid detection. But, still, some people DO see them. Still let it go as a UFO so the public won't pay any attention.

www.military.com...

Neither am I, im just annoyed at a once decent forum being filled with crap. But hey the real experts dont know anything but some remote viewers do?.. somethings simply remain unexplained, until they eventually are explained... eventually.

Also im not close minded, I beleive in Aliens have done for 3 decades, ive seen my own sightings of unexplained lights, but I have a nose and a mind. People can read it, and im sure most would be of the same mind as my own after doing so, believer and skeptic alike.

Crap or not, this has been going on worldwide since January 2011 and not a single "expert" has been able to explain the source. There are many other unexplained phenomena experienced by millions of people that "experts" cant explain. As smart as we think we are, there is much we don't have a clue about. We might as well hear what the remote viewers have to say. In the end, who knows? Maybe they are the experts for this particular phenomenon.
I personally would like to know more about this group of RVers, and the details of this viewing session. I am not inclined to believe what they report, when I know nothing about them or their methods. A video would have been nice, or a link to their website... something. It's like LMH added it as a sensational closing tidbit, with nothing to back it up.
As for the topic at hand - ATS is a big site, with a wide variety of topics. One man's crap is another man's candy when it comes to topics on ATS. We all find part of the stuff interesting. We don't all agree on which parts.

a reply to: 321equinox

Thank you for your reply, Equinox.

If you click on the link at the bottom of my OP, then scroll to the bottom, you will see a whole page full of links from the remote viewers, along with an e-mail address to contact them.

There is always the possibility that someone is trying to warn us that conditions are prime for the hinges to come off the thing.

originally posted by: roadgravel
Never believed much in remote viewing but this helps me remember why I have a lack of belief.

The government experimented with remote viewers during wars of the past. I read that in a thread here on ATS with documentation, and, if memory serves me, they had success.

I haven't googled it to see what's out there because I'm in a hurry right now, but I'll see what I can find when time allows.

If documentation shows that remote viewing is trustworthy, the the opinions of members here who don't know what they're talking about is of little interest to me.

a reply to: sled735

Here you go...
Seems remote viewing is good enough for the CIA, so...

www.biomindsuperpowers.com...

Prior to Swann's visit I arranged for access to a well-shielded magnetometer used in a quark-detection experiment in the Physics Department at Stanford University. During our visit to this laboratory, sprung as a surprise to Swann, he appeared to perturb the operation of the magnetometer, located in a vault below the floor of the building and shielded by mu-metal shielding, an aluminum container, copper shielding and a superconducting shield. As if to add insult to injury, he then went on to "remote view" the interior of the apparatus, rendering by drawing a reasonable facsimile of its rather complex (and heretofore unpublished) construction. It was this latter feat that impressed me perhaps even more than the former, as it also eventually did representatives of the intelligence community. I wrote up these observations and circulated it among my scientific colleagues in draft form of what was eventually published as part of a conference proceedings [4].

To summarize, over the years the back-and-forth criticism of protocols, refinement of methods, and successful replication of this type of remote viewing in independent laboratories [10-14], has yielded considerable scientific evidence for the reality of the phenomenon.