Was the French Attack a False Flag???

originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: spy66

EDIT : I also find it odd that all the cars, the exact same cars are parked in exactly the same order as the day of the shooting. When this reporter is making the story. The shooting took Place on a working day. The reporter is at the seen a good day after the shooting.

If you lived in Paris, you would know that you do not move your car unless it is absolutely necessary. The car is for trips to the country on weekends. The Metro will get you to work and spare you having to hunt for parking spaces all day.

- What about all the rental cars? They are also parked exactly like they where at the day of the shooting. There are only two cars that have moved from its location since the shooting, and they are not any of the: Rent @ Car parked along both sides of the street.

- Why are there no People around the crime seen? It is only a day after. There are more than 2,2 million People in Paris plus turists on top of that. No one from the public is interested in this crime seen?


I have been to Paris many many times. And i know for a fact that People do drive their cars on daily bases. PS; i live in Norway it is not that far for me to travel to Paris. I have even been there With my own car.

I'm pretty sure that even if someone dug up the dead body of Charb and performed a DNA analysis to prove he is dead, there would be someone in this thread to claim the result analysis were faked and Charb is in fact having fun Venezuela with Elvis and Jimmy Hoffa.

This is hilarious. Wait, no, it's sad actually.

a reply to: JUhrman

Since everything points to it being a terror attack, and nothing points to it being a false flag, in light of the current event, I claim you are wrong.

Tell me: What is the difference between a terrorist attack and a false flag?

There must be a significat difference since you claim that everything Points it to be a terrorist attack rather than a False Flag.

Explain.

a reply to: spy66

- What about all the rental cars? They are also parked exactly like they where at the day of the shooting. There are only two cars that have moved from its location since the shooting, and they are not any of the: Rent @ Car parked along both sides of the street.

- Why are there no People around the crime seen? It is only a day after. There are more than 2,2 million People in Paris plus turists on top of that. No one from the public is interested in this crime seen?

It is a crime scene that extends over a very large area. The police have probably sealed the area off so that busybodies cannot disturb it. Wouldn't you be even more suspicious if there were people swarming all over the scene stealing evidence and potentially planting things?

originally posted by: spy66
a reply to: JUhrman

Since everything points to it being a terror attack, and nothing points to it being a false flag, in light of the current event, I claim you are wrong.

Tell me: What is the difference between a terrorist attack and a false flag?

There must be a significat difference since you claim that everything Points it to be a terrorist attack rather than a False Flag.

Explain.

Well, easy. Among the various things claimed in this thread, I read that:

- The police officer that was shot isn't dead
- Actors were used in the attack
- The attackers are actually not salafists but working for the MOSSAD etc, etc, ...


All this would constitute a false flag.

I claim all these point are not true as no evidence have been posted to support them. Only feelings


Any other question?

originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: spy66

- What about all the rental cars? They are also parked exactly like they where at the day of the shooting. There are only two cars that have moved from its location since the shooting, and they are not any of the: Rent @ Car parked along both sides of the street.

- Why are there no People around the crime seen? It is only a day after. There are more than 2,2 million People in Paris plus turists on top of that. No one from the public is interested in this crime seen?

It is a crime scene that extends over a very large area. The police have probably sealed the area off so that busybodies cannot disturb it. Wouldn't you be even more suspicious if there were people swarming all over the scene stealing evidence and potentially planting things?

Really. Take a look at the video again. Does it look like the Police have Sealed of the area?

I Guess the guy on the bike got through. And the peopel in the background got through as well.

originally posted by: JUhrman

originally posted by: spy66
a reply to: JUhrman

Since everything points to it being a terror attack, and nothing points to it being a false flag, in light of the current event, I claim you are wrong.

Tell me: What is the difference between a terrorist attack and a false flag?

There must be a significat difference since you claim that everything Points it to be a terrorist attack rather than a False Flag.

Explain.

Well, easy. Among the various things claimed in this thread, I read that:

- The police officer that was shot isn't dead
- Actors were used in the attack
- The attackers are actually not salafists but working for the MOSSAD etc, etc, ...


All this would constitute a false flag.

I claim all these point are not true as no evidence have been posted to support them. Only feelings


Any other question?

I have never made any of these claimes. Not one.

a reply to: spy66

Not everyone has the morbid fascination to go look a crime scene where a dozen people have been killed.

The video looks perfectly normal for a small street in Paris. I have no idea why you think the place should be swarming with people. This is such a strange assumption, and again, one too much.

a reply to: spy66

They were posted or linked in this thread to support the false flag theory. I invite you to re-read the thread if you don't remember them.

Now if you don't support these, what would be, in your opinion, an indication that this is a false flag? I'm not talking about your feelings here about what looks odd or not since this is subjective and prone to bias. I'm talking about events/facts that would support the false flag hypothesis. Would you please share them with us?

Thanks.

Also please explain why you suddenly changed your mind regarding the cop not being dead?

originally posted by: spy66
I think he missed. This cop was alive when the shoot was fired. There would have been blood or at least some red mist because the bullet hit the ground just a few cm from his head.

originally posted by: spy66

originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: spy66

- What about all the rental cars? They are also parked exactly like they where at the day of the shooting. There are only two cars that have moved from its location since the shooting, and they are not any of the: Rent @ Car parked along both sides of the street.

- Why are there no People around the crime seen? It is only a day after. There are more than 2,2 million People in Paris plus turists on top of that. No one from the public is interested in this crime seen?

It is a crime scene that extends over a very large area. The police have probably sealed the area off so that busybodies cannot disturb it. Wouldn't you be even more suspicious if there were people swarming all over the scene stealing evidence and potentially planting things?

Really. Take a look at the video again. Does it look like the Police have Sealed of the area?

I Guess the guy on the bike got through. And the peopel in the background got through as well.

What do you think the red and white tape is?

originally posted by: JUhrman
a reply to: spy66

Not everyone has the morbid fascination to go look a crime scene where a dozen people have been killed.

The video looks perfectly normal for a small street in Paris. I have no idea why you think the place should be swarming with people. This is such a strange assumption, and again, one too much.

- No, they only want to go and whatch them get killed. Dont tell me that out of 2,2 million People not one would be interested at this crime seen. This is not common at all. This is one of the largest if not thee largest terror attack in France since ww2. 90 000 military/police were involved.

- Its odd that there aint no other News reporters at the seen from other News stations.


Its odd that you dont see anything odd about this at all.

Have you ever seen a "marker" in an actual movie? Find an example, please. Also, how were they able to do multiple takes in a public place? Or do you think they created an exact replica of the street on a backlot? The allegations on these videos are so ridiculous it is insulting that they think people would believe them!

originally posted by: DJW001

originally posted by: spy66

originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: spy66

- What about all the rental cars? They are also parked exactly like they where at the day of the shooting. There are only two cars that have moved from its location since the shooting, and they are not any of the: Rent @ Car parked along both sides of the street.

- Why are there no People around the crime seen? It is only a day after. There are more than 2,2 million People in Paris plus turists on top of that. No one from the public is interested in this crime seen?

It is a crime scene that extends over a very large area. The police have probably sealed the area off so that busybodies cannot disturb it. Wouldn't you be even more suspicious if there were people swarming all over the scene stealing evidence and potentially planting things?

Really. Take a look at the video again. Does it look like the Police have Sealed of the area?

I Guess the guy on the bike got through. And the peopel in the background got through as well.

What do you think the red and white tape is?

Thank you for Your attention. Move along there is nothing to see here. LoL

originally posted by: DJW001
Have you ever seen a "marker" in an actual movie? Find an example, please. Also, how were they able to do multiple takes in a public place? Or do you think they created an exact replica of the street on a backlot? The allegations on these videos are so ridiculous it is insulting that they think people would believe them!

Hey, its not my video. I just used it to explain the location of the blood and the cars.

I never used the inputs the produces of that video used to explain the event.

a reply to: spy66

- No, they only want to go and whatch them get killed. Dont tell me that out of 2,2 million People not one would be interested at this crime seen. This is not common at all. This is one of the largest if not thee largest terror attack in France since ww2. 90 000 military/police were involved.

See those flowers by the fence? That is a shrine created by Parisians who are mourning the murder. That proves that people have visited the site respectfully.

- Its odd that there aint no other News reporters at the seen from other News stations.

Why? What's happening there that's worth the expense of sending a camera crew that could be covering a scene where something is actually happening.

Its odd that you dont see anything odd about this at all.

It's odd that you find an ordinary street scene in a neighborhood recovering from trauma odd.

originally posted by: spy66
Dont tell me that out of 2,2 million People not one would be interested at this crime seen. This is not common at all.

And yet, if you would just take a plane to Paris and go to that place, you would see no one is obsessed by seeing the spot the officer got shot in person. I'm sorry but it's you who think this is the normal behavior while the video shows no one care.

Are you saying all the people living in Paris are part of the conspiracy too?

They just don't care.

Do you start to see now why you are the one who seems to have such strange ideas in this thread? You do not seem to think like normal people.


Nothing would prevent people from going there and yet no one is. What does it shows? That no one cares to see that spot in person.

originally posted by: DJW001
The allegations on these videos are so ridiculous it is insulting that they think people would believe them!

Paranoids would. And they are a big business in the conspiracy theory world.

What conspiracy theorists don't get is that the people making these video get money when people watch them. Abusing mentally ill people to make money is one of the oldest trick in the book. They do the same with UFO videos too today.



The problem when discussing with people suffering from PPD is that in their mind, they're right, and you are with the bad guys for trying to show where reasoning is flawed. The brain has a tendency to refuse to admit it has been wrong and will use many tricks to keep the person convinced he is right. We have illustration of this behavior in the thread here, where spy finds it odd that there isn't a crowd around the crime scene, while it's actually perfectly normal. He doesn't seem to be able to process that this is in fact not odd at all. It's terrible but it's how these things work, and why it's almost impossible to have a rational debate with someone with PPD.

a reply to: JUhrman

Also please explain why you suddenly changed your mind regarding the cop not being dead?

All i have said is that it dosent look like he was shot in the head. I said that it only looks like he got shot in the head because of the angle we see the shooter aiming at the head from. The video is 2D that means there is no way we can see from that angle that this was filmed, that the cop was actually hit in the head.

I have never said that the cop didnt die. I have said that the cop was shot. "Where the cop was hot".

a reply to: spy66

Actually I don't think the media ever claimed he was shot in the head. To me it looked like he was shot somewhere else.

This is again a strange assumption made by a CT video.


And again, this is what you posted

originally posted by: spy66
I think he missed. This cop was alive when the shoot was fired. There would have been blood or at least some red mist because the bullet hit the ground just a few cm from his head.

originally posted by: JUhrman

originally posted by: spy66
Dont tell me that out of 2,2 million People not one would be interested at this crime seen. This is not common at all.

And yet, if you would just take a plane to Paris and go to that place, you would see no one is obsessed by seeing the spot the officer got shot in person. I'm sorry but it's you who think this is the normal behavior while the video shows no one care.

Are you saying all the people living in Paris are part of the conspiracy too?

They just don't care.

Do you start to see now why you are the one who seems to have such strange ideas in this thread? You do not seem to think like normal people.


Nothing would prevent people from going there and yet no one is. What does it shows? That no one cares to see that spot in person.

Yes i find it starnge that the Place is so empty just 24 hours after this event.

The authoreties have even left the cops bloot at the location for the People to see. At the wrong location as well. Why dont you care to comment on that?

Why no one is turing up do curiousity is strange.