It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: looneylupinsrevenge
It's actually rather common now for the pets and not the humans to be the master, you only need to do a search for dominance issues with dogs and you should find tons of links describing the problem and solution. It really doesn't take a large brain capacity to become the "master" in any situation, it honestly only takes a change in your state of mind, today we call someone confident (not cocky... BIG difference) if they possess that state of mind. However, animals do this to, infact they do it far better than we do. In the wild a group of animals will establish a "pecking" order rather quickly, with the stronger of the group getting more food and more mates. While the weaker of the group will have to settle/fight for the scraps left behind (kind of like today's social climate actually).
originally posted by: boymonkey74
a reply to: TrueMessiah
Why? we did all without any mods.
originally posted by: boymonkey74
a reply to: TrueMessiah
Why? we did all without any mods.
Given enough time others will follow and Iam going racoon at the moment.
originally posted by: TrueMessiah
I beg to differ, reasons why would open a can of worms.
Let me ask you a question, why is it taking all these species so long? Our closest relatives the apes have been in the same state since we as a underdeveloped species walked along beside them.
originally posted by: TrueMessiah
I beg to differ, reasons why would open a can of worms.
Let me ask you a question, why is it taking all these species so long?
Our closest relatives the apes have been in the same state since we as a underdeveloped species walked along beside them.
originally posted by: Barcs
Evolution doesn't follow any set time table so your question is moot.
originally posted by: peter vlar
Oh no... you already cracked the can open. Please show us what lies within.
exactly what time table do you presuppose is in effect for evolution? is there some constant rate of mutation you are privy to that evolutionary biologists refuse to disclose?
originally posted by: peter vlar
Complete jabberwocky. all other apes currently living today are fully modern species. They have not been in evolutionary stasis for millions of years with no morphological flux as your post seems to imply.
originally posted by: peter vlar
Thinking that a species evolves in order to survive is to put the cart before the horse. Genetic mutations happen all the time, without fanfare or parades and often without any measurable change in the organism's lifestyle. In general, the mutations most likely to be passed to future generations are those that prove useful to either individual or species survival.
The "usefulness" of a mutation depends largely on shifting environmental factors like those of food, predators, and climate, and also on social pressures. Evolution is a matter of filling ecological and social niches. African apes are still around because their environment has encouraged the reproductive success of individuals with different genetic material than ours.
If you think this is wrong, please feel free to spend a week or two naked in the Congo and see who does better, you or the mountain gorillas.
originally posted by: TrueMessiah
Are you implying that one day they are going to eventually reach homo sapiens level intelligence?
Oh there's no time table. For the sake of this thread, I was approaching this from the standpoint of the apes obtaining the same level of intelligence as humans.
I was alluding to them being unable to achieve the same level intelligence as humans. That's all. If it sort came off as me saying that they were somewhat evolutionary stagnant outside of the intelligence issue I apologize. That wasn't what I was trying to say.
They were coexisting alongside those gorillas and other apes basically being on the same evolutionary level (Australopithecus maybe a little higher?). They had the same influencing environmental factors and had to fill those same ecological niches that you mentioned but something happened.
The line we humans descended from all of a sudden took off. Over time, different versions of the Homo genus started to appear. All with increased brain matter and capacity coinciding with each succeeding species that emerged. Subsequently, the intelligence grew as well.
At this point I think you know where I'm going with this and I know there aren't too many who favor these theories and hypothesis' but I firmly believe that we were genetically manipulated and helped in our progression to this current state. All these different homo genus' and species were genetic experiments of extraterrestrials. We are the finalized end result. That's why in the first post I made in this thread, I said that no animal will achieve the same level of intelligence without genetic modification.
originally posted by: Asynchrony
When the human race destroys itself the entire planet Earth is going with us, so, to be quite honest, there will be no new intelligent species following our exit from existence.
originally posted by: Barcs
originally posted by: Asynchrony
When the human race destroys itself the entire planet Earth is going with us, so, to be quite honest, there will be no new intelligent species following our exit from existence.
That's quite pessimistic. I feel that even if humans mess up the earth that badly, it will eventually recover. We aren't above nature or planet earth. You give humans too much credit and not enough to mother earth, IMO. She's been through far worse than the human parasite.