It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: MerkabaMeditation
The speed of light documented in 3,000 year old Vedic texts has been proven ...
originally posted by: Harte
originally posted by: MerkabaMeditation
The speed of light documented in 3,000 year old Vedic texts has been proven ...
Rubbish.
Harte
originally posted by: Harte
a reply to: MerkabaMeditation
Yes.
Harte
originally posted by: MerkabaMeditation
originally posted by: Harte
a reply to: MerkabaMeditation
Yes.
Harte
The proof is right there in that paper - all the maths add up to the exact speed of light, care to disprove it?
-MM
originally posted by: Harte
originally posted by: MerkabaMeditation
originally posted by: Harte
a reply to: MerkabaMeditation
Yes.
Harte
The proof is right there in that paper - all the maths add up to the exact speed of light, care to disprove it?
-MM
The author takes liberties with his units, as well as the (single!) phrase from the Rig Veda.
There is no proof in that paper.
Would you care to prove it yourself?
Harte
19 tropical years = 6,939.602 days.
235 lunar phases = 6,939.688 days (Metonic period by definition).
The Metonic cycle's error is, therefore, one full day every 219 years, or 12.4 parts per million.
wiki / Metonic cycle
A mechanical computation of the cycle is built into the Antikythera mechanism.
originally posted by: MerkabaMeditation
originally posted by: Harte
originally posted by: MerkabaMeditation
originally posted by: Harte
a reply to: MerkabaMeditation
Yes.
Harte
The proof is right there in that paper - all the maths add up to the exact speed of light, care to disprove it?
-MM
The author takes liberties with his units, as well as the (single!) phrase from the Rig Veda.
There is no proof in that paper.
Would you care to prove it yourself?
Harte
Sure, Harte. Will you just first tell me which unit the author - according to yourself - is taking liberties with, so I know where to start that is.
-MM
originally posted by: MerkabaMeditation
originally posted by: Harte
a reply to: MerkabaMeditation
Yes.
Harte
The proof is right there in that paper - all the maths add up to the exact speed of light, care to disprove it?
-MM