It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: truehumandna
They tenkered with our DNA into speices like the Neanderthal was born. Europeans did a lot of mixing with Neanderthal so did some Asians. Now the world was flooded to kill off a lot of the evil mutations also these reptilian taught man lots of perversions. Some survived.
nope that's not what I mean because the mutated DNA by now has been spread all over the world just some has more in them or another type of mutation. Yes the original people were african but just like I said our DNA was tampered with. Dont compare me to them clowns you speaking about. It's facts the first people were african and btw when this was going on the whole world was still connected. The continents splitting was the great flood
originally posted by: r0xor
originally posted by: truehumandna
They tenkered with our DNA into speices like the Neanderthal was born. Europeans did a lot of mixing with Neanderthal so did some Asians. Now the world was flooded to kill off a lot of the evil mutations also these reptilian taught man lots of perversions. Some survived.
I wasn't going to entertain this, but what the hell..
So, according to you the first, purest human beings were african or black, and that the europeans and asians were genetically modified humans created by the anunnaki aliens. Then the aliens also made Neanderthal, and then whites and some asians interbred with the Neanderthal, making their dna even more fugged up and less pure.
I've heard this kind of stuff before, usually the black Nazis that push black power have all these fairy tales as to why and how some ethnic groups are so different from each other within our race of homo sapiens. Black Hebrew Israelites, 'Moors', and even the 'Kemet' clowns tend to spout this kind of #.
originally posted by: truehumandna
Now who were the true hebrews? They were a north african tribe not the Israeli Europeans. The true hebrews been spread all over the world thru slavery like the scriptures say.
ancient Egyptians did not look like modern Egyptians. Ancient Egyptians and ancient hebrews looked alike. Modern Egyptians looked mixed because of Europeans like the Greek and Roman conquering them so they look mixed. Never said sub Saharan african looked like ancient Egyptian or hebrews not all african look the. Same some are more darker and have courser hair because it's hotter in some parts of Africa. In ancient time Egypt was not a desert. So they varied in color some dark some lighter. They looked like Ethiopians. The first slave ship to America was hebrews that's were the word colored people comes from because they varied in color. While later ships were hamites or a mixture of both. Hamites tend to be very dark with rough features. While kemites and Israelites vary in Color with softer features. They tend to.grow hair on face a lot too
originally posted by: r0xor
originally posted by: truehumandna
Now who were the true hebrews? They were a north african tribe not the Israeli Europeans. The true hebrews been spread all over the world thru slavery like the scriptures say.
I'll agree with you on this one little thing i guess. The Hebrews were on the literal border of Northeastern most Africa (Egypt), where it becomes the Middle East. But they weren't descended of black sub-saharan africans. They looked like modern day Arabs and Egyptians which are also ethnic Arabs. So yes, Hebrews can be called North African, but were more Arab looking than black. I hate to use all these racial, generalized words but have no other way to describe.
If there happens to be alot of European or 'white' Jews nowadays, it's only because of what you said, that they were spread throughout the world like the scriptures say. Alot ended up in Europe interbreeding with caucasians over many centuries of history that have been documented and can be followed or studied. This is how we know.
Caucasian race (also Caucasoid[1] or Europid[2]) is a concept that has historically been used to describe the physical or biological type of some or all of the populations of Europe, North Africa, the Horn of Africa, Western Asia, Central Asia, and South Asia.[3] The term was used in biological anthropology for many people from these regions, without regard necessarily to skin tone.[4] First introduced in early racial science and anthropometry, the taxon has historically been used to denote one of the proposed major races of humankind.[5] Although its validity and utility is disputed by many anthropologists, Caucasoid as a biological classification remains in use,[6] particularly within the field of forensic anthropology.[5]
that's what I'm trying to say we all came out of Africa and some Africans did bred with Neanderthal because the first Europeans were african. So I take that earlier statement back.
originally posted by: AnuTyr
Africa isn't exclusively for *black* people or *White* people. This is why they say *Everybody* came out of Africa.
Caucasian race (also Caucasoid[1] or Europid[2]) is a concept that has historically been used to describe the physical or biological type of some or all of the populations of Europe, North Africa, the Horn of Africa, Western Asia, Central Asia, and South Asia.[3] The term was used in biological anthropology for many people from these regions, without regard necessarily to skin tone.[4] First introduced in early racial science and anthropometry, the taxon has historically been used to denote one of the proposed major races of humankind.[5] Although its validity and utility is disputed by many anthropologists, Caucasoid as a biological classification remains in use,[6] particularly within the field of forensic anthropology.[5]
first humans.Never lived in caves or ate raw meat. Our bodies are not even made to eat Red meat. We don't really digest it. We ate fish, fruits, nuts, vegetables and some birds. And we lived hundreds of years the world was more pure. But we sinned.So our life was cut short. As the scriptures.say.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: truehumandna
Cavemen?
Define caveman, please. Cro-magnon lived in caves as did Neanderthal.
Caves were very good places to live, affording protection from the elements as well as predators.
I disagree. I have canine teeth. I digest meat quite effectively. I am an omnivore.
Our bodies are not even made to eat Red meat.
Oh. Sorry, I don't believe in "sin", but you didn't define "caveman". The "first humans" didn't live in caves, they lived on the veldt.
But we sinned.So our life was cut short. As the scriptures.say.
lol no haven't done that in a minute.
originally posted by: Subaeruginosa
a reply to: truehumandna
Were you indulging on "the tree of life" when you came up with this scenario of human origins?
originally posted by: thedeadtruth
a reply to: r0xor
Hate to rain on your parade. But technically yes. Africans did not interbreed with Neanderthals . So are more "purebred" than other races.
But that interbreeding actually gave us cross over immunity to all sorts of older pathogens that traveling Humans had no resistance to .
We analyzed a total of 780,000 SNPs in 125 individuals representing seven different North African locations and searched for their ancestral/derived state in comparison to different human populations and Neandertals. We found that North African populations have a significant excess of derived alleles shared with Neandertals, when compared to sub-Saharan Africans. This excess is similar to that found in non-African humans, a fact that can be interpreted as a sign of Neandertal admixture. Furthermore, the Neandertal's genetic signal is higher in populations with a local, pre-Neolithic North African ancestry. Therefore, the detected ancient admixture is not due to recent Near Eastern or European migrations. Sub-Saharan populations are the only ones not affected by the admixture event with Neandertals.