It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The Little Ice Age (LIA) was a period of cooling that occurred after the Medieval Warm Period (Medieval Climate Optimum).[1] While it was not a true ice age, the term was introduced into the scientific literature by François E. Matthes in 1939.[2] It has been conventionally defined as a period extending from the sixteenth to the nineteenth centuries,[3][4][5] or alternatively, from about 1350 to about 1850,[6] though climatologists and historians working with local records no longer expect to agree on either the start or end dates of this period, which varied according to local conditions. NASA defines the term as a cold period between AD 1550 and 1850 and notes three particularly cold intervals: one beginning about 1650, another about 1770, and the last in 1850, each separated by intervals of slight warming.[
originally posted by: whatsup86
So all over earth weather seems to change for over more than 10 years. Changes you shouldnt be aware off this fast, changes that normally occur over vastly longer periods, changes that go hand in hand with upcoming industries..
The theory on ATS is that scientists made it up to promote green energy industries, but if it was just made up wouldnt the much more powerfull oil industries refute it in seconds and make sure everyone knows? please explain that to me non believers..
my.firedoglake.com...
Big Oil bought and controlled the alternative energy business because Big Oil’s main business is and has always been oil, gas, coal and petrochemical profits first.
So all over earth weather seems to change for over more than 10 years
originally posted by: Eagleyedobserver
Yes my belief in this is getting stronger and stronger This is not a thread with 100 links of evidence. Why?
Because I'm not going to waste my time to do all this for a bunch of trolls.
originally posted by: ParasuvO
a reply to: openminded2011
Too late for what ??
This planet is far from perfect, and has never had a perpetual balance, I really do not see how you can come to calculations you cannot project, as being somehow bad OR good.
Change yes, how it manifests, it could be FAR from sad!
( Frank Luntz, an advisor to the Republican Party. Below are excerpts from this 2002 memo to President George W. Bush titled "The Environment: A Cleaner, Safer, Healthier America". Frank Luntz was employed by the public relations company APCO International, which also worked for the tobacco industry, and helped launching the Friends of Science. Frank Luntz has since changed his position on global warming.)
It’s time for us to start talking about “climate change” instead of global warming and “conservation” instead of preservation.
“Climate change” is less frightening than “global warming”. As one focus group participant noted, climate change “sounds like you’re going from Pittsburgh to Fort Lauderdale.” While global warming has catastrophic connotations attached to it, climate change suggests a more controllable and less emotional challenge.www.motherjones.com...
originally posted by: CB328
So all over earth weather seems to change for over more than 10 years
Yes, but we're supposed to believe it's just an accident, even though it was accurately predicted by science and all their prediction continue to come true.
.
Polar bear habitat – more Arctic sea ice in Canada this week than in early 1970s
Globally, the ice is spitting-distance close to the 1981-2010 average calculated by the NSIDC for this date – which means lots of winter/spring hunting habitat for polar bears.
originally posted by: Grimpachi
a reply to: Eagleyedobserver
ATS doesn't seem to be a friendly place to talk about such things anymore. There are those that get enraged with anyone who even tries to talk about the possibilities and will immediately swamp your thread with old rhetoric. Anyway, I get what your saying and I am sure you know that one localized event doesn't affect the whole in any meaningful way but when we see many such events the model for normal changes and shows a trend.
Some have postulated the tipping point has already been reached and with the reports of increasing methane thaws I am inclined to believe it. The question IMO is no longer how do we stop or slow it but how do we prepare for what is to come.