It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: cuckooold
I am personally suspicious regarding the involvement of North Korea, but there are valid reasons suggesting why it is not in Sony's interest either. It seems Sony have little to gain, and a lot to lose.
Another player perhaps?
originally posted by: cuckooold
In an interesting although somewhat dismissive article from Gizmodo, it is discussed why it's probably not I the interests of Sony to hack themselves.
www.gizmodo.com.au...
The Sony hack is a terrible, awful thing that’s going to leave thousands of everyday employees dealing with the repercussions for years to come. But! At least there’s a crazy, ranting, sheeple-slaying silver lining. Friends, allow us to introduce you to the Sony hack truthers. There are a lot of them.
Their theories inhabit a wide range of crazy — from maybe-something’s-up scepticism to jet-fuel-can’t-melt-steel absurdity — but each is beautiful in its own, special way. Is it all just one big PR stunt? Did Obama orchestrate the Sony hack with the FBI to reintroduce SOPA legislation? Is this the same Big Brother group that went after Donald Sterling? Can we get Michael Jackson involved somehow? Sure! All of the above. Let’s take a tour.
Ok, fairly dismissive so far, but also showing a lot of 'tweets' from people who support the idea of a possible Sony hack.
This however makes me question if it was in Sony's interest;
It’s important to keep in mind that, in reality, all this leaked data was devastating, both to Sony and its employees. Thousands of social security numbers were plastered up for the world to see. Sony may be releasing The Interview in a few hundred US theatres now, but that’s nothing compared to the thousands that they had been slated to previously. Plus, Sony is going to be dealing with the residual lawsuits for years.
Not to mention the fact that this isn’t a movie that Sony Pictures even likes very much! There will be no Oscar buzz. In any other scenario, the movie would have premiered to ok-ish box office numbers and immediately been forgotten about. There is absolutely no reason for Sony to risk its own livelihood — not to mention committing a federal offence or two in the process — on such a dumb, unspectacular, mediocre film.
I am personally suspicious regarding the involvement of North Korea, but there are valid reasons suggesting why it is not in Sony's interest either. It seems Sony have little to gain, and a lot to lose.
Another player perhaps?
originally posted by: Hefficide
a reply to: roadgravel
Fair enough... Explain to me how real time packet traffic equates to a war game as opposed to an actual attack? IPViking is not a simulation - it is a traffic monitor.
Norse operates a global Tier 1 carrier-grade network of more than 8 million sensors, purpose-built for being attacked.
...
When our sensors are hit, they trace those threats back to the source, then deliver that information to you
originally posted by: IShotMyLastMuse
You know what saddens me? people bought into the NK attack hook line and sinker just because the government told them so. even on ATS, so much for critical thinking.
right off to trust the government, the same one that told you there were weapons of mass distruction, the government of "we are not reading your emails" and "you can keep your doctor if you like it!" the government that thinks julian assange is a terrorist and that the people that caused the recession need bail out.
That is the government you guys trust?
Good to know. I'm sure you will be fine.
Also NK got internet what 5 years ago? they are probably still using 56K modems
originally posted by: Hefficide
a reply to: roadgravel
Fair enough... Explain to me how real time packet traffic equates to a war game as opposed to an actual attack? IPViking is not a simulation - it is a traffic monitor.